網路城邦
回本城市首頁 不平則鳴
市長:麥芽糖  副市長: 一葉孤鴻*Jackey*逸名blackjack
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【不平則鳴】城市/討論區/
討論區太公的荊洲 字體:
上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
看聯網雞鴨﹐感嘆多﹐再看奧婆馬﹐抓不住重點的阿扁呦﹗
 瀏覽810|回應0推薦1

曾太公
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

引用文章蓮念出污泥﹐淫穢聲A片﹐留美姑奶奶﹐心定大屌堅﹗ 

引用文章麥芽糖公開請教電小二: 為何姑息養奸, 縱容華碩惡劣行為!

引用文章外省人對台灣文革的鉅大貢獻 

MAR 16 Hi Ed, it's David **** from Zillow,

Please e-mail me the address and I'll let you know what's going on here. Thanks,

David (da**** AT Zillow DOTCOM)

4:08pm#2

看看老美﹐再看聯網﹐感嘆多多﹐奧婆馬是抓不住重點的阿扁呦﹗ 

在擁有近十五萬專業地產經紀的會員網上﹐太公有一主欄文貼出﹐美國一般消費者地產網站中﹐排名前矛的Zillow.com﹐三十六小時內(包括星期日)就主動作出回應(不待太公登門上告)。

反觀我曾重視的聯網呢﹖唉﹗太極拳猛打﹐視而不見﹐唾面能自乾﹐偉大的中華『醬缸』文明﹐那是老美能比得上﹖

不過﹐再看這兩天老美媒体尖鋒時間主戲﹕昨天病拉圾的電視秀﹐今天奧婆馬的『誓言斷絕金融肥貓紅利金』表演。唉﹗伊娘列﹗什麼事﹐碰上當官的﹐那就是不論中美﹐是非真理擺一邊﹐只問立場抉擇。讓太公感嘆喔﹕

真是他媽的﹗真的是英文說的﹕“penny wise; pound stupid”﹐堂堂大美總統﹐也像阿扁﹐小鼻小眼﹐跟著老美小老百姓﹐起鬨瞎鬧﹐聲聲抱怨如深宮怨婦﹔口中只關心一元如何開銷﹐卻提也不提那九百九十九元是怎麼花的﹖花得有用﹖還是丟進肥水裡﹖

****  主欄文 ****

上貼加註﹕原文只在個人網誌發表﹐現在有感觸﹐但個人網誌回應限二千字﹐不能容納上面的中文回應﹔故移不平市城發表﹐亦將原主欄文附貼如下 

Back to Good Old Days? This Arizona House Up $380,000 or 400% In 5 Months?
2009/03/15 23:18:45 瀏覽35|回應0|推薦1

Gee! unbelievable in these crazy days.  Takes a lot of guts to invest or "gamble" your life.

See, how much will you pay for this late 1980' beautiful house with 4 beds, 2.0 baths, 2,382 sq ft ?

 

  

  

First, let see the listing description:

4 BEDROOM HOME ON A CUL-DE-SAC
WITH A POOL DUG OUT AND PLUMBING. JUST NEEDS TO BE POURED. NO HOA.
UNIQUE FLOOR PLAN AND KITCHEN HAS ALL APPLIANCES EXCEPT FRIDGE AND ALSO
HAS GRANITE COUNTERTOPS. CEILING FANS THROUGHOUT HOME.
HOME IS IN
DECENT SHAPE.
GARAGE DOOR HAS MINOR COSMETIC DAMAGE AND ALL THE DOORS
HAVE BEEN REMOVED INSIDE HOME BUT MANY ARE STILL IN GARAGE. AT THIS NEW
PRICE THE HOME SHOULD GO QUICKLY. BUYER TO VERIFY SCHOOLS.

Now, you get a rough idea about the house.   How much are you willing to pay?   Guess it and write the number down and then, read on.

Next, let see what Zillow.com said.  Well, I warn you, well-prepare yourself for the roller-coaster curve skyrocketing that the housing price is going through the roof in Arizona.  Trust our President Obama, we have to be optimistic about anything or something, right?   Everything would be okay like the stock gains last week. 


 

Zestimate Information
  • Zestimate: $482,500
  • 30-day change: $83,500  (Incredible! Price increases $83K in a month for an Arizona house.  Can you believe it?)
  • Value Range: $342,575 - $492,150
  • Last updated: 03/13/2009






So hang on.  Helps are coming and ready on the way from National Association of Realtors and Federal bailout rescue.  Housing will surge higher and pass the peak of 2006!   It is just near the corner, right?  Good old day shall be back, that is why we voted for a man with such a wonderful name with hope:  Bring aroma Back by an Old Back Man.  (NOTE: I am not sure I should use "aroma" or "arrogance."  God will let us know very soon.)

But, wait a minute!  Are we sure that the market is like a flying firework in July?  Are you proud of the number you wrote down a right number as President Obama said, "I believe I did the right thing."  Or is your number far out of the line?  Let's get a second opinion from other famous real estate doctor.  

Oh, my god!  How come Eppraisal.com give the same house estimated value range: $50,000-68,000?

eppraisal for:  ****** AVE, PHOENIX,AZ 

value range:
$50,377              $59,268                     $68,158


Now the last, let look at its sold history as follows:

4 beds, 2.0 baths, 2,382 sq ft

Sale History

10/14/2008:  $105,400 *

11/07/2003:  $133,000

01/15/2002:  $110,000

05/07/1999:  $97,000

08/20/1993:  $90,900


What is the realistic or true market value for this house?  

Is it all depends on what formula or module we use?  After the housing crash, so many people accused banks, brokers, appraisal firms of inflating house value.  However, everyone is just pointing at a scapegoat by making complaints or blaming someone else.   All blamed the current appraisal method.  Can we use "income approach" or "cost approach" to better a home's value? Did I hear anyone present a better way other than the "comparative market approach" to evaluate a home-owner occupied dwelling? 

None! 

Nothing, they are unable to come up a better way of performing it.  The only thing they keep doing is "blaming" others as Taiwanese did.  Ooch! I should say the only TWO things we are good at. Ooch! I should say the only TWO things politicians are good at.  Sorry, they are bragging what they can do or achieve, even they are doing the same thing.  (NOTE: please see my article 引用文章Keep going, folks! We can live on blaming? 啥民主政治是責任政治﹖)

Anyway, an appraisal is just an opinion, right?   Zillow.com gives it half million dollars, Eppraisal puts $50K price tag.   So you have your opinions; I have mine.  I will not be surprised this house would be sold for less than $45,000 even it is in a good neighborhood.  That's my opinion I should be able to get it for less than $50K.

We are in a free society to express an opinion, right?  Even you are in appraisal business with licence, nobody says your profession is a "science" as nobody says an attorney is doing a science.  You are probably unable to get a degree of science, but a bachelor of art instead.  All the academic students agree an appraisal report is a function of "art" by some rules.  So, bear that in mind, please just don't drag Zillow.com, eppraisal.com or me to a judge as some prosecutors did or intend to do recently once the housing price dives down or flies up in the sky later;

It is just a democratic way of "compromise" between Sellers and Buyers, under a free market mechanism.  Who says price is constant or can be fixed?  No student of economics or even an average person says so, except a stupid government?   Everyone does have his right to do his judgment wildly, weirdly or wisely. 

It is normal to have a housing price up or down, if not bubble or burst, at any time.  It is natural as a cyclical activities as Four Seasons.   Don't be surprised!  Nothing strange!


雲遊去了﹐有緣自聚

本文於 修改第 2 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3334745