網路城邦
回本城市首頁 不平則鳴
市長:麥芽糖  副市長: 一葉孤鴻*Jackey*逸名blackjack
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【不平則鳴】城市/討論區/
討論區太公的荊洲 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
給一個理由﹐為何要在聯網鬼混?
 瀏覽909|回應3推薦1

曾太公
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

引用文章避秦空城: 【軍事會談:】城市

 

給一個理由﹐為何要在聯網理雞鴨﹖
2009/02/23 04:45:56 瀏覽8|回應0|推薦0

FEB
22

What you are not remembering is that Obama is the second coming....he can do anything....I'm hoping for Change in 2010 and we can get back on the right track.


Karen P***** (***** Realty Group)
FEB 22
10:30am ‧ #1
203,600 Points Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

I posted in my last 2 blogs an interview with Isakson who lead the 15k charge and a meeting, in the second blog, with the Fed rep in Atlanta. A lot of your issues are talked about and I blog about. I think that the President is doing the right thing so far. I was concerned about the inflationary effect but the Gentlemen for the fed explained how the money would disappear as the programs started to work. So I am optomistic but concerned. For sure we were going no where but down with the last administration. So here is hoping this one with it's action plans will be different


Charlie ******  ***- 579-1098 **** Realty)
FEB 22
11:34am ‧ #2

134,117 Points Outside Blog

Hi Ed

Obama plans to permit the courts to modify the mortgages will keep private investors out of the mortgage market and buying mortgages to the point were the only buyers of mortgages will be the federal government.  Not a good solution.  The needs to adjust with out goverments interference.

Good luck and success

Lou Ludwig


Lou **** CRB, CRS, CIPS, GRI, SRES, TRC, e-PRO, (***** & Associates)
FEB 22
11:39am ‧ #3

FEB
23
 

 

To Karen: In my article Who Cares the Home Affordability? All We Need is BIG Brother Obama , I share the same "second saviour" feeling with you.   In my article Obama is another Pres. Carter,  I agree with you about 2010 and 2012.  Anyway, we have a great democracy to self-correct a mistake.  Just hope we can overhaul its inherent defects before a monster comes out.

To Carlie: You said: "I think that the President is doing the right thing so far."  Well, I think Obama is driving our vehicle to the wrong way so far.  He always repeats: "it is a tough decision to be made" that implied there are upside and downside in his every decision.  How conclusive he may have to say it is the right thing to do?  I don't know, all I can say is this is possible that he is not 100% sure about the positivity of result. It may create a negative effect beyond his imagination.

You said: "For sure we were going no where but down with the last administration. So here is hoping this one with it's action plans will be different."  I don't mind to keep hoping, that is the only way for an incurable optimist like me and explains why I assume Obama has a good heart and kind intention.  But how can you say "for sure" when we look at the History which tells us different possibility may come out? 

Recently, as George Bush and Barack Obama have done when they are trying to blackmail us by so-called "urgency," many people hold the same assumption that: "We have immediate need to do something NOW to correct the trend. Do something is better than being inactive."  Is this a right way of thinking?

In my article Who Cares the Home Affordability? All We Need is BIG Brother Obama,  there is an almost perfect case.  In just 3 years, nature course has done its job to bring the housing market where only 3% of people can afford back into the affordable one in which about 70% can own a house.  Did anything done by GWB help its happening?  No, as you said, the GWB boys were going nowhere.  The only thing they did is making it even worse.  However, we the people didn't die; and "the Invisible Hand" said by Adam Smith works itself out basically.

First, please look back at your personal life, you will agree with me that, so many times and cases, doing nothing is much better than doing the wrong things as President Truman once said, in his decision of intervention into China, "Let's the dust rest."  

Secondly, please look back at what came out of the policies made by Bush, Paulson and Benanke in the name of "urgency," i.e. they even made a claim to the lady Pelosi that the only way to "save" us is to pass the law in "ONE DAY" for them to implement the first 800 Billion Rescue plan.  Sounds like otherwise we die?  But did we die?   So, how sure you are about Obama even you don't see there is basically no "approach" difference between Paulson and Gaithner?

So, how sure or how inculsive you have about Obamanomics?  Don't just count on those bureaucrats' words.  If you do, please go check this article "Down Payment Assistance Rescue H.R. 6694" and tell us what rationality they have and how right they are to back up their statement.

To Lou: Thank you for enlightening me your wisdom. 

Thank you, all of your kindness.

 


FEB 23
8:44am ‧#4

Well, look at the numbers of clicks and replies, particularly the first I got in 3 hours at the American blog. Then, look at the same numbers at UDN.  There is no reason for me at all to mingle with UDN chickens, ducks and zambies. 

It is also very clear that there is no rationality or personal respect in UDN, only to get myself insulted.   No need to be in UDN, except my sincere concern over my homeland and my people, as well as my appreciations towards my teachers and KMT Party who gave me a chance to grow and learn.


I shall overcome it and erase my existence in UDN.


雲遊去了﹐有緣自聚

本文於 修改第 4 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3300273
引用者清單(2)
2009/02/25 06:12 【不平則鳴】 蒼浪之水
2009/02/24 19:06 【不平則鳴】 黑傑克被獨腳強盜SCFtw和雞女士GAIL騷擾, 向聯網當局抗議無效, 憤然離去!
 回應文章
封鎖高喊不平二丑的烏鴉嘴
    回應給: 曾太公(et13808) 推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
是讓栽贓你的烏鴉得意嗎?
看文巧爽城, 讓雞高站城口, 攻擊執政黨罩門二二八.
紅衛兵的大串聯, 玩到聯網啦!
網工大出擊!!!
也許, 老丐也該關閉丐邦?
讓蕭查某和將她打入大牢的姐妹, 還有獨腳強盜, 三寶六婆, 爽一下?



回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3309843
請以真情正理﹐自由放大屁﹗
    回應給: 麥芽糖(myata) 推薦1


曾太公
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖


揭開「曾太公」的神祕面紗
回應文章無意見 (stonekey)
市民YST2006/05/02
22:01




大家對「曾太公是政大外交的才子」這個命題還有一絲一毫的懷疑嗎?

這是很簡單﹑可查証的事實﹕太公東吳政治系1972年文學士畢業﹑政大外交研究所1975年法學碩士畢業。那個時侯與其他台灣大學的科系﹐太公有過求學的關係﹖

歪市長如此歪說硬拗﹐非要把太公說成是政大外交系﹑東亞研究所不可﹖而聯網『名市長』也跟著『指鹿為馬』﹐瞎眼說話﹔那麼真的讓人很伊娘列的佩服。蓋士人無恥﹐牛鬼蛇神如此之多﹐中華民國卻還屹立不亡﹐果然是國父天靈保佑﹐國運確實是昌隆喔﹗

如果連這麼簡明的事實﹐歪市長迄今都不肯認錯﹐都要堅持台諺說的『白布染黑』﹐那麼其他比較複雜難明的事﹐能指望他能實事求是﹐黑白有明﹖能在心中祭出『鬼火』時﹐卻不歪纏符道﹐硬說成是『孔明燈』﹐要眾歪教徒人遵行﹖那難如登天﹗

聯網人當時重情義﹐熱情衝昏頭﹐猛推薦歪道人﹔到今天可以冷靜冷眼了嗎﹖對歪市長的『帝昭』﹐能不有『一絲一毫的懷疑』﹖那不是瞎了眼﹐就是中了符蠱﹐方會如電小二般﹐猛吻『台灣妓生虫』的屁股。



唉,難道曾太公不知道,紙是包不住火的。為了這麼小的事情,就可以出賣自己的信譽,曾太公的信譽也真是太賤價了。喪失了信譽,以後如何在【聯網城邦】中立足?曾太公為自己編寫的【回憶錄】還有任何人會相信嗎?

紙是包不住火的』﹐總有一天真相會大白﹕歪市長跟中共究竟有啥關係也就會知道為何歪市長對太公如此不能容﹕因為太公堅信也忠於中華民國。

在聯網近四年﹐太公從來以真人實身示人﹐對自己所言負責﹐不曾說過半句假話﹐
太公的誠信﹐推想該當『自在人間』﹔但是﹐事實與此推理﹐諒有差距。

太公一再歡迎﹐有人能明確以事實﹐指証太公有虛言假語﹐一定會讓太公無臉再在
聯網混﹔迄今﹐也是無人既願又有能力提出質疑﹐反而是雞鴨一味以立場﹐作不實的栽贓抹黑。

今天﹐太公反思三年網上言行﹐回老家對先祖恩師﹐自問仍然俯仰無愧﹐就在心定
止水﹐欲離聯網前夕﹐再做出同樣的自我肯定﹐也同樣再度歡迎任何『謊話』的質疑。。

對太公的誠信﹐人若有疑﹐請把握最後幾分鐘﹐自由放大屁﹗己若有虧﹐定當自縛
待刑以謝罪。

蓋太公一離此網﹐就會抱著『舊的不去﹐新的不會來』﹐會把聯網置之腦後﹐是不會如正直的黑傑克那樣回來貼文﹐有如我近半月來的網誌般﹐不再發任何文章﹐純粹當成儲存文檔﹑保存記憶的晶片而已。



本文於 修改第 1 次

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3306846
黑傑克如今安在?
    回應給: 曾太公(et13808) 推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 

呵呵!
黑傑克也是這樣子說.
麥芽糖這裡的網友, 在聯網被人栽贓欺負, 小二不理會.
現在黑傑克每貼一次文, 小二就屁顛屁顛地首頁推薦.
真是人走了才可惜?

黑傑克, 被獨腳強盜和雞女士騷擾, 向聯網當局抗議無效, 憤然離去!
麥芽糖不是造謠:

回本城市首頁
往事曾經如此
市長:blackjack


udn城市政治社會政治時事【往事曾經如此】城市
請聯網處理SCFtw(x)與GAIL的違規行為暨本人拒絕被罵賤貨聲明(1)
回應文章網路罵女老師爛貨,系主任判刑!GAIL罵本人「賤貨」,SCF罵本人「爛貨」,為何聯網不處理? (blackjack)

市民blackjack
2006/10/06
請聯網處理SCFtw(x)與GAIL的違規行為暨本人拒絕被罵賤貨聲明(2)
回應文章思想控制永遠不對-從余登發一案談起 (blackjack)

市民b






本文於 修改第 4 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3300554