網路城邦
回本城市首頁 不平則鳴
市長:麥芽糖  副市長: 一葉孤鴻*Jackey*逸名blackjack
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【不平則鳴】城市/討論區/
討論區【不平則鳴】 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
司法改革 --- 需要您的正義之手!
 瀏覽62,709|回應264推薦22

Reed
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (22)

陸游2號:漫長當下
龍女CHANG, HSIU-FEN
多硯坊 (休)
馮紀游陸游:漫長當下
亓官先生
CHARLIE
吐嘈王
雲淡風輕w
逸名
-Uncle-

more...

懇請諸位網友移步至我們的希望地圖網站】,

要先申請登錄帳號 ,才能去點「我也這麼希望」喔!

並請轉貼給您的朋友,

謝謝您幫忙八旬老夫婦完成最後心願!感恩!

【2008/07/19 聯合報】 劉泰英入獄 脫光檢查
北監管理員核對劉泰英身分後,大聲告訴他 「劉泰英,你的編號是三七三三」,並要他交出攜帶的行李,進行人、物檢查;接著被要求脫光衣物,躬著身子咳嗽兩聲、檢查肛門有無異物。劉泰英在受檢過程,神情落寞、不發一語。 劉泰英檢查身體後,理完頭髮換上囚服....

看到此文,想到老爸當年所受的冤曲及非人待遇,不禁淚溼衣襟.....

難怪出獄後,老爸絲毫不願多提獄中情形,並且選擇性失憶.....
能否想像一位終生盡忠職守的老憲兵,為了買賣土地,登報申冤,
竟遭來如此奇恥大辱,真正是情何以堪?
敬請各位網友道義相挺,



敬請人道支援 我卓越不群的母親

八旬阿嬤
【台灣司法◎人間煉獄】部落格

本文於 修改第 2 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=2802492
引用者清單(7)
2012/01/30 04:17 【愛車族】 美國喜美油電車集體訴訟
2011/11/22 07:33 【不平則鳴】 為監察院彈劾罵髒話法官鼓掌
2010/06/28 06:49 【女男大不同】 熱門師生不倫戀, 法院正確翻案!
2008/11/17 13:11 【不平則鳴】 臺灣人的哀矜無喜: 「收押禁見」對阿扁失效,司法自廢武功 - 洛杉基
2008/08/29 10:05 【阿嬤後援會】 情治人員, 自甘走狗, 不是新聞!
more...
 回應文章 頁/共27頁 回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁
從部長開始, 整治關說陋習!
    回應給: Reed(chouhwa) 推薦1


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢

序曲剛才開始, 好戲還在後面!






本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=5007105
美國恐龍法官, 被上級法院 甩一耳光!
    回應給: Reed(chouhwa) 推薦1


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢

下面說的那位美國恐龍法官, 發現自己凸槌啦:

他把犯人, 緩刑三十一天, 全國譁然! 

然後: 他發現自己錯啦! 法律規定: 至少要緩刑兩年! 所以, 他下令重審, 今天開庭!

就在他要開庭之際, 最高法院通知他: 禁止開庭! 他們要接手審判.

這個法官, 被甩一耳光! 只有摸摸鼻子, 簽收命令, 等待最高法院審判!

Montana Supreme Court Blocks Judge's Bid to Resentence Teacher in Rape Case

District Judge G. Todd Baugh presides at a hearing in Great Falls, Mont., in this undated file photo.
AUTO START: ON OFF

Montana's Supreme Court blocked a judge today from resentencing a former teacher who was given a 30-day sentence for raping a 14-year-old girl who later committed suicide.

The ruling, which was supported by four of the court's seven justices, was handed down today one hour before a hearing was scheduled to void the 31-day prison sentence given to Stacey Rambold.

"We conclude that the stated intent of the District Court to alter the initially imposed oral sentence in today's scheduled hearing is unlawful," the State Supreme Court's ruling said. "We take no position on the legality of the imposed sentence, and will address the parties' arguments in that regard on appeal."

Last week, Rambold, 54, a former teacher at Billings Senior High School, was sentenced to 15 years in prison with all but 31 days suspended and received credit for one day served.

Rambold was charged in October 2008 with three counts of sexual intercourse without consent after he was accused of having a sexual relationship with Cherice Moralez, who was 14 at the time, according to court documents.

She committed suicide in February 2010 while the case was still pending.

District Judge G. Todd Baugh, who imposed the sentence, became the subject of backlash after he said in court that the victim was "older than her chronological age" and had "as much control of the situation" as the teacher, according to the Billings Gazette.

He later said that he regretted his comments.

"I don't know what I was thinking or trying to say," Baugh later told the Billings Gazette. "It was just stupid and wrong."

Baugh initially stood by the sentence, but then scheduled the hearing today to determine whether it should be increased by two years.

Attorneys for the state said the sentence was illegal, but that holding the hearing today would "cause gross injustice to an orderly appeal."

Rambold entered a three-year deferred prosecution agreement in July 2010. The deal said that the charges would be dismissed if Rambold completed a sex offender treatment program, did not have contact with children and met other conditions, according to The Associated Press.

He agreed to the deal and admitted to one rape charge.

The case resurfaced in December 2012 when prosecutors learned that Rambold had been terminated from the sex offender program and had unsupervised visits with minors, who were family members, according to the AP.

Rambold's defense attorney said that Rambold had continued his treatment in a different program and was found low risk to reoffend after an evaluation, the AP reported.

"I think what people are seeing is a sentence for rape of 30 days. Obviously, on the face of it, if you look at it that way, it's crazy," Baugh told the Billings Gazette. "No wonder people are upset. I'd be upset, too, if that happened."

The judge said that the reasons for Rambold's termination from the sex offender program were not serious enough to warrant the lengthy prison sentence the prosecution was seeking.

The case resulted in a $91,000 wrongful death settlement between the school district and Moralez's family, and Rambold reached a confidential settlement with the family, according to the AP.




回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=5006678
法官:21女未違意願, 判決性侵無罪。
    回應給: Reed(chouhwa) 推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 

法官 is a tough job.

檢控性侵30女 法官:21女未違意願


圖/聯合報提供
檢方指控李宗瑞性侵卅名女子,但台北地院審理認為,其中廿一名女子分別因未到庭陳述、或性交過程與李談笑風生性交後沒有逃離、哭泣、救援之舉,因此無法認定李宗瑞違反她們意願性侵,此部分判決無罪。

判決指出,廿一名女子中,有十四人未到庭陳述,無法判斷李宗瑞有無違反女子意願而性交;另經勘驗性愛光碟內容,部分女子與李性交時,還對李說「舒服」。

這些女子聽從李宗瑞指示,不斷配合變換性愛體位,還環抱李的背部、腰際,與李接吻,再順勢讓李脫去內衣褲;性交結束後,這些人也沒有逃離、哭泣、求援等行為。

其他七名女子中,有人主動幫李宗瑞口交,也有人用私處磨蹭李的下體,在性交過程中,對於李詢問「喜不喜歡」、「舒不舒服」等調情問題,也均回答「喜歡」、「舒服」。

依據影片中女子的身體動作及性交後反應,合議庭無法認定這些女子是處於酒醉或不能抗拒的狀態,因此無法斷定是否處於違背意願下遭性侵。

【2013/09/04 聯合報】http://udn.com/



全文網址: 檢控性侵30女 法官:21女未違意願 | 李宗瑞性侵判刑 | 國內要聞 | 聯合新聞網 http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS2/%E6%AA%A2%E6%8E%A7%E6%80%A7%E4%BE%B530%E5%A5%B3%20%E6%B3%95%E5%AE%98%EF%BC%9A21%E5%A5%B3%E6%9C%AA%E9%81%95%E6%84%8F%E9%A1%98-8141115.shtml#ixzz2dwUA3rZY 
Power By udn.com 




回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=5005857
美國恐龍法官, 發言不當, 道歉!
    回應給: Reed(chouhwa) 推薦1


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢

This is very contraversial. He does need to apologize!

Montana judge has apologized for comments blaming 14-year-old victim who killed herself.

SHARE 10242 417 335COMMENTMORE

A Montana judge is under fire for sentencing a 54-year-old former teacher to just 30 days in jail for raping a 14-year-old girl who later committed suicide.

District Judge G. Todd Baugh, in sentencing Stacey Rambold on Monday, said victim Cherice Moralez was "as much in control of the situation" as her teacher, referring to Cherice as a troubled youth "older than her chronological age," the Billings Gazette reports.

Cherice was 16 when she killed herself in 2010 after the case was sent to criminal court.

Baugh stood by his decision Tuesday and again Wednesday.

"Obviously, a 14-year-old can't consent. I think that people have in mind that this was some violent, forcible, horrible rape," Baugh said Tuesday. "It was horrible enough as it is, just given her age, but it wasn't this forcible beat-up rape."

Wednesday, the judge apologized for his remarks but not the sentence.

"I don't know what I was thinking or trying to say," he told the Gazette. "It was just stupid and wrong."

COLUMN:: The verdict on Hannah and the Montana judge

He submitted a letter to the editor expanding, saying he was "not sure just what I was attempting to say, but it did not come out correct."

"What I said is demeaning of all women, not what I believe and irrelevant to the sentencing," Baugh wrote. "My apologies to all my fellow citizens."

He told the paper he would more thoroughly explain his reasoning behind the sentence and add it to the court file this week.

The sentence came after Rambold was terminated in November from a sex-offender treatment program that was part of a deal to defer prosecution for felony rape, theGazette reports. Rambold had been having unsupervised visits with minors, who were family members, and did not inform counselors that he had been having sexual relations with a woman.

The judge said he wasn't convinced that the reasons for Rambold's termination from the program warranted the 10-year prison term recommended by prosecutors.

After his 30-day jail term ends, Rambold will be on supervised probation for 15 years and must register as a sex offender.

Wednesday, the newspaper reported, Baugh reiterated that the sentence was "appropriate given the nature of the case." He compared Monday's hearing to "a probation violation in which a defendant is resentenced for violating terms of a suspended sentence," the Gazette wrote.

Cherice's mother, Auliea Hanlon, left Monday's sentencing hearing screaming, "You people suck," the Gazette reported. Some victims advocates are calling for the judge to be censured.

Tuesday, Hanlon issued a written statement: "As I looked on in disbelief, Judge Baugh stated that our teenage daughter was as much in control of the situation as her teacher was," she wrote. "She wasn't even old enough to get a driver's license. But Judge Baugh, who never met our daughter, justified the paltry sentence saying she was older than her chronological age.

"I guess somehow it makes a rape more acceptable if you blame the victim, even if she was only 14."

A protest was planned for Thursday near the Yellowstone County Courthouse in Billings.

"Something is not right with our system when a judge can make that kind of decision," Marian Bradley of the Montana National Organization for Women told the Gazette. "Unless we show our outrage, none of our children are safe, and no one will think of us. I think the judge needs to be reviewed, and he needs to be sanctioned."

Bradley said she will circulate a petition calling for the state to investigate Baugh's sentence, although county prosecutors said it was within state sentencing guidelines.

Baugh told the newspaper Tuesday that he stood by his comments that Cherice was a troubled youth who was older than her age when it came to sexual matters. That didn't make Rambold's sex with Cherice any less of a crime, he said.

The teen's death complicated the case, Baugh said.

"I think what people are seeing is a sentence for rape of 30 days. Obviously on the face of it, if you look at it that way, it's crazy," the judge said. "No wonder people are upset. I'd be upset, too, if that happened."

Contributing: Associated Press

SHARE 10242 417 335COMMENT






本文於 修改第 3 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=5003748
白衫軍的訴求 就是叛徒可以大搖大擺的回來驕其妻妾嗎?
    回應給: Reed(chouhwa) 推薦1


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢

靠!

老丐的打狗棒, 要像孫悟空的金箍棒, 飛起來揍人啦!

是否繼續犯 林毅夫案將移司法

林毅夫案是否繼續犯將移司法。(本報資料照片)
林毅夫案是否繼續犯將移司法。(本報資料照片)

軍方人士今天表示,林毅夫投敵案將在軍事審判法修正案公布5個月後,函移犯罪地檢察署。是否為繼續犯,由檢察機關認定。

立法院日前三讀修正通過軍審法部分條文,現役軍人在非戰時犯罪,將由一般司法體系偵辦、審理。總統公布生效後,分兩階段執行。

軍審法修正後,承平時期現役軍人犯凌虐部屬、阻撓部屬陳情、殺人、性侵或竊盜等罪,為第一階段移送司法機關偵審範圍;其餘陸海空軍刑法或特別法等罪,自修法公布後5個月後施行。

軍方人士表示,第二階段移轉範圍包括通緝中案件,林毅夫涉及陸海空軍刑法投敵罪,將在第二階段,也就是軍審法修正案公布後5個月後函移檢察機關。

軍方人士說,林毅夫案移轉後,是否繼續構成陸海空軍刑法中投敵罪,將由犯罪地檢察署依相關卷證認定,並決定是否繼續通緝。

出身宜蘭的林毅夫原名林正義,1979年在金門任馬山連連長時,以游泳方式叛逃到中國大陸後,改名為林毅夫,曾任世界銀行首席經濟學家、中國大陸政協委員。國防部目前仍認定林毅夫為通緝中的敵前叛逃罪犯。1020812

關鍵字:林毅夫





本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=4998107
好險: 美國可是法官被槍殺! 士林地檢署, 毛賊當庭亮槍!
    回應給: Reed(chouhwa) 推薦1


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢

真是好險:

美國可是法官被槍殺!

士林地檢署安檢大漏洞! 毛賊當庭亮槍

士林地檢署前後門都設置金屬感應門,但仍接連發生被告在候訊室自殺、當庭亮槍事件。
記者徐尉庭/攝影
竊盜慣犯陳浩然前天被傳喚到士林地檢署開庭,檢察官認為他有反覆再犯之虞,當庭逮捕並告知要聲請羈押;陳即當著檢察官的面亮槍朝向女法警,隨即跑出偵查庭,在接近地檢署大門十多公尺處被數名法警撲倒制伏,法院裁定羈押。

士林地檢署指出,聲准羈押陳浩然是針對竊盜部分,亮槍是否涉嫌恐嚇及槍支是否具殺傷力而涉嫌槍砲條例部分,另案偵辦。台北市刑大指出,陳涉嫌淡水一宗電腦公司竊案被送辦,他持有的槍支是改造手槍,沒有子彈也沒有撞針。

據了解,前天上午十一點,陳浩然因竊盜案出庭,庭訊約一小時後,檢方表示要聲押。他轉身拿起放在後方椅子上的背包,站庭女法警詢問「要做什麼」?他回應「我拿個東西」,隨即從包包內掏出手槍指著女法警。

陳浩然疑似拉了兩次手槍滑套後,未發一語奪門逃出士林地檢署二樓的第三偵查庭;檢察官、書記官愣了一下,急忙按下警鈴,女法警則衝出偵查庭大喊「逮捕他」。

陳跑下樓準備從士檢大門逃逸,但六名法警已趕抵法警室旁的樓梯間,將距離大門十多公尺的陳撲倒;一名法警用手指卡住陳的手槍扳機以防擊發,其他法警壓制陳並將他上銬,送往候審室等待院方開羈押庭。

法官問陳浩然為何在偵查庭亮槍,陳閃避問題,告訴法官「案子(竊盜案)不是我做的,我是冤枉的!」還稱自己有心臟病;法警替他叫救護車到場,他又改稱不必就醫。法官訊後認為他有反覆實施犯罪及逃亡、串證之虞,裁定羈押禁見。

今年五月丁姓女子涉毒品案遭檢方聲押,才在士林地檢署候審室廁所持皮帶刀自殺身亡,短短三個月又發生被告當庭亮槍事件,讓不少司法官感到憂心。

士林地檢署襄閱主任檢察官顏迺偉表示,現行犯得依法搜索,但陳是檢方傳喚到庭,無法強制搜身,僅能安全檢查;陳所持有槍支已送交鑑定有無殺傷力。


圖/聯合報提供

【2013/08/09 聯合報】http://udn.com/



全文網址: 士林地檢署安檢大漏洞! 毛賊當庭亮槍 | 慣竊地檢署亮槍 | 國內要聞 | 聯合新聞網 http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS6/8085113.shtml#ixzz2bQBdtgmb 
Power By udn.com 




回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=4996942
美國的恐龍法官
    回應給: Reed(chouhwa) 推薦1


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢

不做愛就殺 嫖客槍斃妓女無罪

嫖客槍殺妓女竟無罪?中時資料照 梁貽婷攝
嫖客槍殺妓女竟無罪?中時資料照 梁貽婷攝

嫖客殺了妓女還無罪?美國德州一名男子開槍射殺一名妓女,原因是她拒絕提供性服務,該男子最後竟獲法官,判處無罪釋放。

這名德州男子吉爾伯特(Ezekiel Gilbert),在2009聖誕夜,付了150美元找了23歲伴遊女郎芙蕾果(Lenora Ivie Frago),但對方拒絕提供性服務,一怒下開槍射穿妓女的喉嚨,導致她全身癱瘓,數月後死亡。

案件近日開審,被告辯稱自己不是蓄意殺人,只是認為性行為是服務的一部分,指該妓女取得報酬又沒有提供服務,等同搶劫。陪審團最後認為被告做法合理,因為根據當地法律,容許民眾在遇盜竊時,可以使用致命性武力作防衛,故最後判被告無罪,當庭釋放。

各國的民情不相同,但法律保障的基本人權也不該被濫用,不然逍遙法外的壞人只會愈來愈多,同時也失去了這社會的公平正義。

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=4972625
柯文哲驚什麼?
    回應給: 麥芽糖(myata) 推薦1


吐嘈王
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢

 

 

 

 

               

  

 

 

台大名醫柯文哲收到法院傳票,對媒體大叫:「這個國家瘋了!」

  這個國家沒有瘋,而是人民瘋了!柯文哲醫師因「國科會其他教授涉嫌A公帑,他蓋了審核章,所以捲入。」這有什麼奇怪?柯文哲是名人,還有機會上媒體Show一下演技,如是一般小人物,被關進牢裡也活該!

  吐嘈王在13年前打狗(國防部軍情局轉任北榮工務室的情治人員)給主人(北榮工務室主任潘博豪)看,當時的政風室主任、秘書室主任、人事室主任、甚至院長全幫工務室主任(他的姐夫先後是輔導會主任秘書、輔導會副主委、國民黨不分區立委、現任退伍軍人協會理事長的高仲源)。偽造變造文書,框吐嘈王(北榮工務室技士王文同),而且限制吐嘈王在院內網路BBS撲文喊冤!

  後來吐嘈王又被捲入一宗竊盜案,院內軍情、警察轉任的政風人員,勾結北投刑警如野狗群般,把吐嘈王當三腳貓狂咬,吐嘈王有理由懷疑,這和得罪情治、政風人員有關,是否合情合理?可置公評!

 北榮(管理階層)的執法就是這個國家執法的櫥窗,為溫飽當狗是宿命,溫飽無虞,還要當狗,那就是狗

 柯文哲收到法院傳票,合情合理,是否違法,柯文哲有的是資源去跟執法單位鬥,這個國家沒有瘋,瘋的是沒權沒錢的百姓,幸好吐嘈王還會寫文章,架網站宣洩,逼北榮裝嚨作啞,否則吐嘈王早瘋了!

 前些日北榮為陳水扁病情做專業評斷:「居家治療對病情改善有助益」。吐嘈王沒有理由懷疑北榮有挺扁意識,但後來北榮大言不慚的解釋:「這是站在醫療專業的角度所做的建議,不是從病人是否是犯人的角度考量」。連白疵都知「居家治療對病情改善有助益,這對任何強姦,強奪,殺人魔都一樣!」,這也算專業評斷?

 吐嘈王相信,「教授們A國科會研究經費」這和「特別費」一樣,一開始有教授貪便宜,觸碰灰色地帶,沒人被起訴,於是大家跟進,因有教授身份,(和所有首長身份一樣) ,檢調也睜隻眼,閉隻眼,這次一定有人告發,檢調不得不辦!

馬英九的別費案是陳水扁身陷泥沼拖他下水如果馬英九也學「賴子」,拖李登輝下水咸信李登輝也會一身腥所有首長鮮少能幸免所以蘇貞昌把這「所有首長也是人的共業」,不要臉的臉上貼金稱為「歷史共業

 首長教授操守清高這是單純百姓一廂情願的印象其實不是這麼回事!首長教授充其量他們讀的書堆起來比屠夫吐嘈王讀的書高(也比身高173的吐嘈王高)但看到鈔票他們心跳不會比吐嘈王低否則首長、教授他們就不是人!

 柯文哲你跟隨了過去教授的共業腳步充其量是所有首長教授跳不出的「人性」牢籠,也不是什麼罪大惡極但呼天喊冤:「連太太都問:『錢到那裡』」也搬了出來,就像小丑了!

 總之, 國家機器本來就是執政的人在操作你現在挺扁說好聽你是唐吉訶德說難聽你是阿Q

2013/05/09  

 

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=4960482
電小二怎麼不推薦吐嘈王的文章
    回應給: 麥芽糖(myata) 推薦1


吐嘈王
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

難道吐嘈王的文章見不得人?

 

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=4960475
引用者清單(1)
2013/05/15 10:44 【不平則鳴】 聯網排行榜的排名決定因素
台灣阿Q: 是制度殺人,還是柯文哲目無法紀?
    回應給: Reed(chouhwa) 推薦2


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (2)

吐嘈王
文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢

 
台灣阿Q

是制度殺人,還是柯文哲目無法紀?

2013/05/11 11:20:27瀏覽1428|回應24|推薦32

台大醫生、挺貪扁的柯文哲哭了!

哭得邊擤鼻涕、邊控訴這個制度、這個國家要改革,「這個國家瘋了」。說幾百個教授、幾千個助理因國科會補助研究計畫經費,以假發票或換發票報銷被偵訊,是國家會虛耗空轉的原因。

是這個國家瘋了嗎?是制度殺人?

其實柯文哲錯了!國家沒有瘋!也不是制度的錯!

經費核銷制度或許有其窒礙難行之處,但是法就是法!窒礙之法,也是國家之法。

公務員領國家錢、用國家經費,以假發票或是以大額發票換小額發票有罪、要被關。教授、研究人員拿國家補助、人民的錢,以假作真、以虛報實,一樣是違了法、有了貪。一樣有罪,該繩之以法。

豈能因為多拿個博士學位、多掛著教授、醫生頭銜,多些社會菁英的名氣,就能在法律之前有高人一等的待遇及特權?

司法若因身分貴賤而有不同寬嚴之分,那要這法治何用?

台灣的社會就是有那麼一群平時正氣凜然、道貌岸然的人,動不動以專家學者、社會菁英、意見領袖的姿態出現,評論人非、罵人之錯、口沫橫飛~呸!呸!呸!

但當自認官大學問大、學位拿得高,卻自己便宜行事或貪心做出了偷雞摸狗、違背法律、法規的事。卻又一副敢做不敢當,龜出凡事都是他人的錯、制度的錯,千錯萬錯就是自己沒錯的龜孫子樣。

是丢臉!讓社會看不起,這種斯文掃地、菁英窩囊貌。

這就是台灣社會高高在上教導學子、指指點點社會該怎麼走、國家該怎麼改革的一群所謂的高級知識份子模樣?

「仗義半從屠狗輩  負心多是讀書人」,此言誠不欺我!

其實國家及人民待這些端坐冷氣房、象牙塔的知識份子真的不薄。

既有高薪可領,又能拿國家國科會、教育部等單位的預算及補助研究高深、微妙的自然或社會科學奧秘。研究所得的成果及發表的論文,又能名為己有,墊高自己的學術價值、身份行情,可說是台灣這個社會最豐衣足食、高枕無憂、最該滿足的天之驕子。

跟求一職不可得、求三餐溫飽的百姓相比,不知感恩珍惜一分一利得來不易,還用不實發票來報帳A錢、A名牌椅、A筆電...,真的是貪得無厭了。

在一般私人企業,老闆給你錢買蘋果,你可以狸貓換太子拿去買烏魚子?

不行嘛!

所以!制度容有些時,有窒礙難行之處該檢討、該修正,不致阻礙正常運作。但是,不能明明自己編計畫預算是要補助印刷、雜支或是交通費...,你卻拿去用文具、紙張等發票換義大利椅子、換包包...,卻說這是制度的錯!

這絕對不是制度的錯!而是教授、名醫自以為學位高、知識深、身份尊,就猖狂墮落、目無法紀了!

是一種知識份子的傲慢及貪婪!是一種自以為與一般百姓差別不同的病態優越! 

柯文哲笑的進去應付一下檢調約談。

哭得出來、一把鼻涕、 一把淚的手足無措淚訴國家之非、人民之誤。撥光了這層菁英份子言行不一、表裡不同的虛偽面具,人民看到知識份子的墮落、腐臭。真不知柯文哲哭什麼?不是比扁勇敢嗎?是查出了貪的真、害怕入囹圄?小小余文面對司法的態度,都比讓社會覺得他很大的柯文哲,令人肯定。

這就是台灣這個國家菁英份子犯了錯,不認錯的眾生相!現世了!

教授、名醫,書讀得多,心不端、行不正,還真是丟臉!羞死、見笑了祖公!羞愧了台灣!

要指摘制度之非、國家之瘋,可要先讓自己正常些,有些正正當當做人的模樣!

林益世貪瀆是錯。若柯文哲也報帳不實詐領,於法、於民眼中,與林何異?與扁何別?

哭什麼?與貪扁學懦弱?



�X�B:是制度殺人,還是柯文哲目無法紀? - ROCgood 的部落格 - udn部落格http://blog.udn.com/ROCgood/7608457#ixzz2T14Od3be






本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=4959538
頁/共27頁 回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁