純提供素材﹐不加味精﹐沒有黑心成分﹐希望國人好好省思﹐自己以科學求真的態度﹐對『統﹑獨』問題﹐得出自己的結論﹐在這次大選中﹐投下神聖﹑獨立﹑負責的一票﹗
比利時向來是和平寧靜的天堂﹐卻正面臨史無前例的政治危機﹕要統﹖還是要獨﹖政府空轉已達二百餘天。
在大英帝國操控下﹐比利時獨立成國。這個國家﹐是由說兩種語言的兩個不同民族組成﹐雖然透過多年中央貧富操控﹐使昔日富者變窮﹐佃農卻成暴發戶﹐但還是一向認同自己﹐是統一獨立的國家。
在建國已有一百七十年後的今天﹐卻面對著國家認同的沖擊。以第三者﹐觀看比利時今日政治現象﹐再看台海兩岸﹐觀察台灣島內﹐統合分裂﹐政治空轉﹐諸多巧合相似﹐頗值得吾人遠觀近看﹐引以為借鑑焉。
註﹕這篇文章﹐無一人推薦﹐實在是聯網人只會小鼻小眼﹐各據立場叫罵﹐多數是是豬八戒﹐不識人蔘果﹐最好的明証。太公珍惜﹐略加註明中文﹐再獨立成主欄﹐盼國人開光有悟焉。
引用文章中華人民共和國﹐簡稱中國﹐可簡稱中華民國。
  交流“两岸现状”的理解 |
2008/03/03 07:24 瀏覽548 ｜回應14｜推薦4 |
|
| 1. 两岸同属一个中国，两岸人民均同时拥有对岸主权。 2. 北京和台北为互不隶属的两个政治实体，当前中国未完全统一。将来两岸是走向统一还是走向分裂，要依靠两岸人民的智慧来解决。 3. 当前客观现状下，由其中一个政治实体代表全中国参与国际事务可以理解，但应该照顾到对岸人民参与国际事务的愿望。 4. 涵盖台湾和大陆的新的政治实体，需要两岸人民共同协商产生。 |
|
| 說得真好,憑什麼取消我們大陸人的子民資格?就算中華民國要解散,都要取得全體中華民國人民的同意. |
Article – February 1, 2008
Posted/Updated: 2008-02-01 16:40:09
Europe
Belgium's Identity Crisis A Sign of Things to Come for the European (China) Union?
Belgium, a model of European democracy, is experiencing a long, arduous political crisis that raises the question: Will the European (ET says: how about China and Taiwan) Union face similar impasses?
BY RYAN P. DENEE
A drive through the countryside of Belgium is a unique and relaxing experience not soon forgotten. The scenic tree-lined roads, with trunks sometimes inches from the pavement, are an expression of order and natural beauty. The branches springing from opposing sides of the road intertwine to form a comforting tunnel of lush foliage.
Belgium’s government is in political gridlock, threatening to split the nation in two.
Source: MCT
Beyond the roadside are vibrant green meadows, another facet of the country’s beauty. Fields dotted with grazing cows and wildflowers are pleasing to the eye. A walk through the serene, mature forests provides the opportunity for quiet contemplation.
The villages and towns are also welcoming. The narrow, cobbled roads wind by small yet practical and pleasant homes. The cafés offer the chance to sit and relax with a sandwich and a glass of locally-brewed ale while watching passersby.
A stroll through bustling downtown Brussels, the nation’s capital, which is lined with a variety of shops and stylish boutiques, is also a memorable experience. In particular, chocolate shops provide a treat that is world-renowned. The center of the city, like many of Europe’s great cities, offers visitors an open square, with beautiful, old and intricate architecture on every side, four to five stories high. The famous Brussels waffles (known as Belgian waffles in North America) are sold from small stands, offering pedestrians the unmatched taste of crisp yet soft dough smothered in rich whipped cream.
This is Belgium.
比利時向來是和平寧靜的天堂﹐卻正面臨史無前例的政治危機﹕要統﹖還是要獨﹖政府空轉已達二百餘天。
Yet this seemingly idyllic, peaceful country has just experienced an unprecedented political crisis.
Government Breakdown
From the national elections in June 2007 through late December, the country was without a government. For more than six months, disagreeing politicians and parties were unable to form a coalition to lead Belgium.
On December 19th, the king of Belgium intervened to help create an interim government that will serve the country for three months. In effect, the parties that were elected by the people of Belgium on June 10, 2007, remain unable to form a coalition.
A country with over 10.5 million people is sorely divided—to the point that the government has become paralyzed. A highly developed, modern country and democracy has been unable to produce leadership for the nation for almost 200 days.
This tiny land, nestled between France to the south, the Netherlands to the north, and Luxembourg and Germany to the east, has garnered international attention because of this crisis. Many cannot believe this is happening. Others wonder why it is taking place. Some, understanding the country’s differing peoples, suggest that Belgium should be dissolved. Others fear this possibility.
Why has this happened in such a seemingly tranquil country? How could this happen in a stable Western democracy in the developed world? What can be learned from such a high-profile social/political experiment that has led to a sovereign nation being without a government for half a year?
And what does this mean for the rest of Europe (the world, such as China and Taiwan)?
A Brief History
Belgium was created by Britain in the 1830s. The northern Flemish region (predominantly Dutch-speaking) was combined with the southern Walloon region (largely French-speaking). Arguably, this was beneficial to the region at large, but not without consequences for the people living within its borders.
In the 19th century, the Walloon region had many natural resources. As a result, the Walloons were the wealthy people of the land. In effect, they dominated the country at the time, with many looking down on the Flemish with an air of superiority. In fact, it was not until well over 100 years later that Dutch became an official language.
In the latter half of the 1800s, as a fledgling nation, the Belgian government had to quickly gain the loyalty of its diverse citizenry. This happened through massive public work schemes, trade unions, nationalized industries and social security networks. Quickly, the entire government became a mechanism to reallocate wealth—in effect, buying the support of the people.
Over time, this caused the Flemish to become more prosperous. When some of the resources ran out in the French-speaking south, the north quickly became the wealthier region. Today, the Walloon region produces only 24% of the GDP, while representing 33% of the population. This change in economic strength, among other factors, has fueled a significant level of division between these two groups.
Consider the layers of government necessary to appease two distinct groups of people who would not agree—who would not put the other’s interests ahead of their own. In many regards, the government structure became a tangled, monolithic bureaucracy.
The current federal government is comprised of no less than 11 political parties. But these are regional, not national. In a nation where voting is mandatory, people tend to vote along linguistic boundaries. There are several parties with differing political platforms represented in Fleming, and there are several in Walloon, also with differing platforms. This means that a majority government is almost impossible. Coalitions must be established, in an attempt to “fairly” represent these two disagreeing groups of people. This has ultimately led to a tremendous stalemate—the recent inability of the government to form over a period of six months is a case in point.
One of the basic elements of the latest dispute is that the Flemish no longer want to subsidize the southern Walloon region. They are seeking a larger voice on how their money is spent. Those in the Walloon region do not see a need to change the status quo, leaving the opposing sides in uncompromising positions.
在大英帝國操控下﹐比利時獨立成國。這個國家﹐是由說兩種語言的兩個不同民族組成﹐雖然透過多年中央貧富操控﹐使昔日富者變窮﹐佃農卻成暴發戶﹐但還是一向認同自己﹐是統一獨立的國家。
在建國已有一百七十年後的今天﹐卻面對著國家認同的沖擊。
In summary: two peoples—two languages—and one struggling, crippled government.
This has led many to wonder if the country should split. Some have suggested that the Dutch-speaking region merge with the Netherlands and the French-speaking with France. Certain separatists have loudly cried for independence, but polls indicate that the majority of Belgians do not want to divide.
本城市首頁
看回應文章
等級：8
回應給： 
等級：1
回應給： 
