They’ve had enough with people like LP Tseng（曾太監）(Great! 太監這詞﹐原來阿九流的英文是翻成ＬＰ﹖這真是繼『馬死矣』活路外交後﹐另一偉大發明﹗Anyway, I have the symbol "LP" as my title as a "VP" for a senior banker.  I have LP, not like you without LP.  Who cares whether it is right or not?)

88888888888888888888888888888888888888

現成的『子矛子盾』

He deserves to be criticized.

Back to you in your own words: I get his attacks way too often. My articles are obviously captivating and interesting as hell, otherwise, why on earth would he bother? 【Sorry, I am not going to correct them for you.】 

I have been working my entire career trying to bridge the gap between US and Taiwan relations. (in a mysterious way) 【Sorry, I am not going to correct it for you.】

Back to you in your own words: "我和錢復沒淵源，1984 年""我們幾個打國際法""的，銜命赴美處理"軍購合約的兩地適法性"，錢代表負責簡報，並將部裡的英譯資料逐一解說，他提到..."

*****  *****  *****

引用文章西雅圖之役﹕台灣敢對美國下最後通牒﹖錢復不是說我們要乖嗎﹖

引用文章美金通用

引用文章弱國無外交﹖

引用文章我對錢復的看法案例一﹕侯伯夫事件

引用文章我對錢復的看法案例二﹕紀政立委『雙重國籍案』的省思

引用文章我對錢復的看法案例三﹕給陳香梅的禮儀及禮遇

引用文章我對錢復的看法案例三﹕給陳香梅的禮儀及禮遇（二﹕此羅非彼羅﹖）

Gee! where are those cases: 4, 5, ....?  It is supposed to have 5 cases at least.  Sorry, I am too busy to write them for being bothered by jerks like you.  I did a lousy job to get on your nerves where I should concentrate.   Neverthless, where we can find your answers on the above 3, at least?   (Don't tell me I should use "the 3 cases mentioned above".  If you do have the drive, go write on UDN's literature forum.)

Where ARE those your articles I have been kept to make my comments on, as you claimed "I get his attacks way too often"?  How come I don't remember anything about you or your articles, except this "bird" article in Mei-feng's city?  Please be a man and tell everyone where they are.

Now I know my decision is ABSOLUTELY right.  Guess what I am going to do, the nagging bird?

BTW, I admitted that my English is NOT good enough to teach a naive jerk, even it is better than the one your master Dr. Mark Ma has.   It is your master's resoponsibility to teach you, not mine.  And also thank you for making self-corrections on your English mistakes made by your masters,  such as Fredrick Chien's "Third Secretary in the U. S." into "Secretary of MOFA," after I gave you my advice.

The last, thank you for the article to remind me of what I should do next: to keep going on the origional track.  Your most stupid article really confirmed my thoughts on the future or my "fate": destination.  Tell you what my self-correction is: from now on, I have at least one year to concentrate on writing something I do know to unveil the "mysterious" stupidity of your diplomacy and share my vision with my fellow citizen folks. 

Sorry, you are not invited and absolutely not included here as "my folks."  You are just a distraction or sideline I must ignore to reach my success.  Please get lost! Otherwiese, don't blame me for I'll treat you like the plague.

However, your recent article is so so so so Great that I have a lot of fun!   At least, now you let everyone know that you have admitted E. T. has kept his LP that you don't have.  Thank you, dummy bird.

不管怎樣，太公確是聯網少人可以匹敵的才學之士，您對他批馬的論點﹐如果真難以茍同，則當發揮您博士程度之才華﹐與之批駁﹐為馬辯護，這樣才能讓人服氣。

梅峰兄﹐

您上面這兩句話﹐說得一級棒﹗可讓太公沈思良久﹐一直不知是否該如聯網狐群般﹐也『禮尚往來』﹐而按『推薦』鈕互捧。

在聯網﹐太公一直是單打的個体戶﹐從皂市開始﹐只因提個『什麼是泛藍﹖』的幼鳥問題﹐被華碩臭鼠等圍摳以來﹐迄今已有兩年。就見聯網﹐不少正直人士都離開。太公仍然堅持﹐作個聯網人的『評論員』﹐對聯網健康生態﹐仍不放棄﹐太婆昨天還勸我﹕『狐狗盤據﹐所為何來』﹖

其實﹐太婆說的﹐我都心知肚明。她用的勸告語﹐也都是太公的一貫人生態度﹕

一﹑天下事無完美﹐常是有利就有弊﹐小草之民﹐何必操心﹖何不順自然﹖

二﹑個人自由主義者﹐尊重他人﹔人人有自己判斷﹐別人要如何做﹐太公會提建議﹐但一向『不強求』﹐反而有『您做您的﹐咱搞咱的』的口頭禪﹔只求適者﹐在大環境中能生存。何不自掃門雪﹐莫視他人有瓦霜﹖

三﹑行行有學﹐業業有術﹔太公啥都不懂﹐只懂些政治及房地產﹐若有所專﹐也只有外交﹔所以在聯網﹐少對其他國事發言﹐蓋真的不懂。記得太公在聯網﹐第一篇文『一兩論』﹐就已表明太公不敢說外行話。可是﹐太婆說﹐台灣人﹐人人懂外交﹐口沬橫飛﹐沒完沒了﹐淘淘不絕﹐宛若黑天下酸雨﹐快三年了﹐太公又能淨水若干﹖

四﹑太公在網﹐一向實言論事﹐以紅衫軍為例﹐聯網上﹐大概也只有太公一人﹐一直為國家政治的正常發展﹐反對此一盲舉。太公盡量以理用智﹐以所學報國﹐鼓舞國人有前瞻。

但是﹐國人只用情﹐因人癈言﹐以言癈人﹐迄今有那一位大市長或大寫手﹐重視太公的呼籲﹐不要『以罵治國』﹔對太公的國事言論﹐常無詞以對﹐避而不談﹐反而動輒人身攻擊﹐侮辱惹來一身臭﹐這又何苦來哉﹖

五﹑聯網有其網友規範法則﹐太公一向遵守﹐可曾違反﹖不參加某市為民﹐但引用文章﹐讓人有據查詢真假﹐何來放冷箭﹖用真名實身﹐以示『好漢負責』﹐但也尊重虛名自由﹐不曾制定撰文守則』﹐強諸他人。卻反有弄虛之徒﹐如皂市臭鼠﹐反控太公愛名氣自戀﹐歪市長的反責『神秘面紗』﹐真是惡人先告狀。太婆曰﹐何不也低痞﹐用虛名分身回敬﹖

唉﹗公眾之事﹐如祖孫騎驢﹐要據立場﹐並無不可﹐但盼上流高痞﹐不要下流低痞。太公近日﹐對台灣妓生虫及鬼市烏魚﹐以牙還牙﹐加以髒話﹐固然是『以直報怨』﹐但太公自知﹐是自己開始『形而下之』。何以至此﹖

在聯網的現制下﹐各市長有絕對的權力﹐劃地為王﹐胡作非為﹐人人如蔡阿彌﹐卻也以之為善﹐認係合理。殊不知﹐天下沒有任何事物﹐是絕對的。如同政客﹐權力源自憲法﹔在聯網﹐市長之權﹐也是來自聯網憲法﹕上網守則﹐對任何網友人身自由﹐都應該尊重。唯有也只有在這樣的前提共識下﹐才有理性的市長權及理智的論政空間。聯網既已成惡﹐太公又何必流連﹖

宛似對中華民國外交部的絕望﹐靠辭職﹐能不再目睹﹐心或能放下﹗近日口出惡言﹐絕非一時有何怒氣﹔在我潛意識中﹐應該是有一股衝力﹐渴盼被聯網開除﹐斷絕再上網流口水之路﹐以他人之力﹐行戒毒之欲﹐效伯夷叔齊之流放吧﹗