何以太公說阿九流﹐『連說話都口齒不清』﹖實在說﹐太公台灣土狗﹐心地有夠仁厚﹐沒一再說他們一天到晚﹕『自己打嘴巴』﹐自己搬石頭砸自己的腳。 您看﹐這不是又來了一篇找挨罵的鳥文﹐現成的『子矛子盾』﹖菜鳥﹐就會耍鸚鵡嘴﹐猛流口水﹐那兒有人的腦漿﹖ 唉﹗太公實在不愛罵人﹔只是有人﹐老是犯賤喔﹗ 引用文章漂亮﹖可以當飯吃嗎﹖
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>   等級：7 留言｜加入好友	電視台的新聞主播大都是漂亮臉蛋 回覆此篇　刪除 2008/04/29 14:50 電視台的新聞主播大都是漂亮臉蛋 北韓除外 新聞局長等於是國家的 電視新聞主播 找個賞心悅目漂亮點的 也是迎合古今中外世界現實啊~ ☆☆☆開張天岸馬 奇逸人中龍☆☆☆ 曾太公(et13808) 於 2008-04-29 21:47 回覆： 刪除 臉蛋﹖ How about Barbara Walters now? She is the number 1. She can be everything, but a beauty, right? 哈哈哈﹗在聯網﹐擁馬人眾。太公信手拈來﹐其中狡狡者﹐雙手亦難盡數﹔最少有消遙散客﹑稱職主婦（和番）﹑閃電狼﹑天蠍浪子﹑時季常﹑冬月﹑麥牙糖及兄等等。當然下品者﹐亦常獻醜﹐如皂市華碩阿九流之輩﹐連說話都口齒不清﹐就不提也罷。 以撰文才學博大﹑觀念敏銳角度﹐就目前觀﹐和番﹐仍係狡狡者中鰲首。若以智慧觀﹐散客兄如其品茗﹐品味很高﹐太公弗如﹔吾兄與天蠍浪子﹐皆似為高手﹐讓太公有點難分伯仲﹔但此次再度有機會﹐與兄交談﹐現在太公已能明判二者高下矣。 沒有太多人﹐喜愛苦口良言﹐太公就如此打住 (不管您如何回應)﹔改天看看﹐是否寫篇狗屁文﹐以治學撰文的『理論與實際』角度﹐純學術講古﹐跟聯網人哈拉。祝 撰安。 註﹕本主欄文﹐原擬奉覆知悉後﹐就行閉嘴封文﹐但吾兄既又有意外的回應﹐太公只好讓它繼續曬太陽﹐等您看到我新回應後﹐再行封文﹐請見諒。

No dime for a jerk, thank you. 瀏覽14｜回應0｜推薦0

2008/04/30 22:36:03

家國主義 家主政治 中華家國 ～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～ 曾太監《 英文版 1.0 》 ～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～ 曾匪偽中，自號太監、太公、土狗 哇嘛來啊 2008/04/30 21:38:29 Ahh.. Where do I begin, so much ignorance and yet so little time? Lately, there is a question floating around in this forum: why are so many people leaving UDN? This should be obvious to anyone with half a brain, but if for some reason you can’t figure out... the answer is: They’ve had enough. Enough of what? They’ve had enough with people like LP Tseng（曾太監）(Great! 太監這詞﹐原來阿九流的英文是翻成ＬＰ﹖這真是繼『馬死矣』活路外交後﹐另一偉大發明﹗Anyway, I have the symbol "LP" as my title as a "VP" for a senior banker.  I have the symbol "LP" as my title.  I have LP, not like you without LP.)

88888888888888888888888888888888888888

現成的『子矛子盾』

He deserves to be criticized.

Back to you in your own words: I get his attacks way too often. My articles are obviously captivating and interesting as hell, otherwise, why on earth would he bother? 【Sorry, I am not going to correct them for you.】 

I have been working my entire career trying to bridge the gap between US and Taiwan relations. (in a mysterious way) 【Sorry, I am not going to correct it for you.】

Back to you in your own words: "我和錢復沒淵源，1984 年""我們幾個打國際法""的，銜命赴美處理"軍購合約的兩地適法性"，錢代表負責簡報，並將部裡的英譯資料逐一解說，他提到..."

*****  *****  *****

引用文章西雅圖之役﹕台灣敢對美國下最後通牒﹖錢復不是說我們要乖嗎﹖

引用文章美金通用

引用文章弱國無外交﹖

引用文章我對錢復的看法案例一﹕侯伯夫事件

引用文章我對錢復的看法案例二﹕紀政立委『雙重國籍案』的省思

引用文章我對錢復的看法案例三﹕給陳香梅的禮儀及禮遇

引用文章我對錢復的看法案例三﹕給陳香梅的禮儀及禮遇（二﹕此羅非彼羅﹖）

Gee! where are those other cases: 4, 5, ....?  It is supposed to be at least 5 cases.  I didn't write them.  I did a lousy job to get on your nerves on which I should concentrate.   Neverthless, where we can find your answers on the above 3, at least?   (Don't tell me I should use "the 3 cases mentioned above".  If you do have the drive, go write on UDN's literature forum.)

Where ARE those your articles I have been kept to make my comments on, as you claimed "I get his attacks way too often"?  How come I don't remember anything about you or your articles, except this "bird" article in Mei-feng's city?  Please be a man and tell everyone where they are.

Now I know my decision is ABSOLUTELY right.  Guess what I am going to do, the nagging bird?

BTW, I admitted that my English is NOT good enough to teach a naive jerk, even it is better than the one your master Mark Ma has.   It is your master's resoponsibility to teach you, not mine.  And also thank you for making self-corrections on your English mistakes made by your masters such as Fredrick Chien's "Third Secretary in the U. S." into "Secretary of MOFA," after I gave you my advice.

The last, thank you for the article to remind me of what I should do next: to keep going on the origional track.  Your most stupid article really confirmed my thoughts on the future or my "fate": destination.  Tell you what my self-correction is: from now on, I have at least one year to concentrate on writing something I do know to share my vision with my fellow citizen folks. 

Sorry, you are not invited and absolutely not included here as "my folks."  You are just a distraction or sideline I must ignore in order to reach my success.  Please get lost! Otherwiese, don't blame me for I'll treat you like the plague.

However, your recent article is so so so so Great! At least, now you let everyone know that you have admitted E. T. has kept his LP and you don't have that things.  Thank you, dummy bird.