選擇性新聞    呆胞別再被 民賤黨 文宣 騙了

選擇性報導是指廣泛報導的罕見事件，從而改變了人們對其實際普遍程度的看法。這在廢話的實踐者中很常見，他們 - 以及他們的客戶 - 有選擇地報告他們的成功，但沒有提到他們的無數失敗。與櫻桃選擇形成鮮明對比的是，選擇性報告通常是無意識的，並且集中於事件的報告和記憶，而櫻桃選擇更具體地選擇證據並積極忽略不利的證據。兩者都是確認偏見的機制，也是為什麼軼事證據無論如何“令人信服”，都不被接受為科學和理性主義的證據。

Selective reporting refers to rare events which are widely reported, thereby altering the perception of how common they actually are. This is common amongst practitioners of bullshit, where they — and their customers — selectively report their successes but make no mention of their numerous failures. It contrasts to cherry picking in that selective reporting is often unintentional, and concentrates on the reporting and memory of events, while cherry picking is more specific to selecting evidence and actively ignoring evidence that isn't favourable. Both are mechanisms of confirmation bias and are reasons why anecdotal evidence, no matter how "convincing", is not accepted as evidence in science and rationalism.

八類媒體偏見

8种 違反媒體的客觀性 1誤導性定義：通過語言來損害讀者。 2不平衡的報導：通過不成比例的報導扭曲新聞。 3意見偽裝成新聞：不恰當地將意見或解釋注入保險範圍。 4缺乏背景：為讀者隱瞞參考框架。 5選擇性遺漏：將某些事件報告給其他人，或隱瞞關鍵細節。 6用真實的事實得出錯誤的結論：用有缺陷的邏輯來感染新聞。 7事實扭曲：弄錯事實。 8缺乏透明度：未對讀者開放和負責。

選擇性曝光理論