http://www.dsti.net/Information/News/59878
DARPA啟動可變形狀旋翼系統研製專案
2010-06-18
[據美國《航空週刊與空間技術》2010年6月7日報導]在被忽視了多年之後,美國的旋翼機技術又將出現在國防部的研究專案中,該項目是研製一種可變形的旋翼系統,以顯著提高有效載荷和航程,並降低雜訊和振動。
國防高級研究計畫局(DARPA)將該專案命名為任務適應旋翼(MAR),已向3個波音、西科斯基和貝爾/波音傾轉旋翼機小組授予了為期16個月的初始階段研製合同,以評估適應旋翼技術的範圍,並研究一種全新的“目標”旋翼系統和一套可在現有平臺上使用的驗證旋翼的設計方案。
DARPA MAR專案經理Daniel Newman說:“該旋翼系統的幾乎所有參數均可變,包括扭轉角、翼型、弦長、硬度、轉速等。”
Newman表示,目前這一代的美國軍用直升機旋翼系統的設計已經沒有太多的餘度。而MAR是一種全新的旋翼,將有更大的自由度。
MAR的目標是設計一種可以在執行任務前及飛行中改變幾何構型的旋翼,使旋翼可適應更廣泛的飛行情況。
MAR的槳葉可以改變其長度、後掠角、弦長、撓度、槳尖形狀、扭轉角、剛度、轉速及其他參數。Newman稱這項技術可適用於任何旋翼系統,包括傾轉旋翼、尾槳、推進器及渦輪機。
目前工業界還沒有公開MAR的研發情況,但西科斯基用iPhone舉例,說MAR將使飛行員只需要觸摸駕駛艙顯示幕的按鍵就可以選擇低雜訊、高機動性、平穩飛行或其他模式。(中國航空工業發展研究中心 李昊)
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/jsp_includes/articlePrint.jsp?storyID=news/awst/2010/06/07/AW_06_07_2010_p24-231440.xml&headLine=Darpa%20Sets%20Goals%20For%20Morphing-Rotor%20Demo
Darpa Sets Goals For Morphing-Rotor Demo
By Graham Warwick
Washington
After years of neglect, U.S. rotorcraft technology is to get a boost from a Pentagon research program that aims to fly a shape-changing rotor offering substantially more payload and range with significantly less noise and vibration.
Three teams have been awarded contracts for the initial phase of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Mission Adaptive Rotor (MAR). Program managers plan to fly an adaptive rotor by 2018 to ready the technology for the next U.S. military rotorcraft program.
Boeing, Sikorsky and the Bell Boeing tiltrotor team have received 16-month Phase 1 contracts to assess a wide range of adaptive rotor technologies and develop designs for both a clean-sheet “objective” rotor system and a demonstrator rotor that can fly on an existing aircraft.
“Adaptation of all blade attributes are on the table: twist, airfoil, chord, stiffness, rpm., etc.,” says Daniel Newman, Darpa’s MAR program manager. “There are many technologies available. It’s not just any one, it’s about developing multiple adaptive technologies that complement each other.”
Newman says rotor design has remained largely unchanged since the current generation of U.S. military helicopters was introduced in the 1960s and 1970s. While it has invested heavily in advancing fighter technology to today’s fifth-generation F-22 and F-35, “the Defense Department has historically underinvested in rotorcraft, which are still at the equivalent of the F-4 Phantom,” he says.
“The challenge has been developing new rotor technology, because most rotors since then have been modifications, and the few all-new designs have been risk-averse. MAR is an all-new, clean-sheet rotor that will be much less constrained.”
The wings of fixed-wing aircraft are far from fixed, with movable flaps and variable camber that enable lift and drag characteristics to be changed in flight. Wings have been built that can vary in area, chord, span or sweep. In contrast, the aerodynamic and geometric characteristics of a rotor blade are fixed during design, and never change.
The goal of MAR is a rotor that can change its configuration before a mission and in flight, between mission segments and with every revolution. “Adaptation for rotorcraft is a huge opportunity because the blades see a wide range of flight conditions,” says Newman. “They can adapt between mission segments and also around the rotor azimuth.”
The blades on an adaptive rotor could change their length, sweep, chord, camber, tip shape, twist, stiffness, rotational speed or other attributes. Newman says adaptive technology will be “available for any rotor,” including tiltrotors, tail rotors, propellers and “rotating turbomachinery.”
Industry teams are keeping their MAR cards close to their chests, but Sikorsky talks illustratively about iPhone-like “apps” that would allow the pilot to select low noise, high agility, smooth flight or other modes at the touch of an icon on a cockpit display.
MAR objectives are aggressive: increase payload by 30% and range by 40%, and reduce rotor acoustic-detection range by 50% and vibration by 90%, compared with a clean-sheet “non-adaptive,” or conventional, rotor. “Darpa’s goal is to achieve all the metrics simultaneously, with the recognition that some combination will be achieved,” says Newman.
Industry supports the initiative. “Many people in government, industry and academia regard active rotor technology research as a major step toward dynamically improved performance and reduced rotor vibration and noise,” says Rhett Flater, executive director of industry advocate AHS International. “[The Defense Department] seeks improved range, speed and payload, as well as safety, survivability and affordability. The MAR program, at least on paper, addresses many of these needs.”
MAR is an outgrowth of Darpa’s Helicopter Quieting Program (HQP), which developed high-fidelity analysis tools to predict rotor acoustics. These were demonstrated in 2008 by correlating the results of analysis and wind-tunnel tests of Boeing’s Smart active-control rotor. The original plan was to have a second phase, but Newman says better acoustics “were desirable, but did not justify investment in new rotor technology.”
In its place, MAR was defined to tackle acoustics, performance and supportability; the program goals are to be achieved without degrading, and hopefully while improving, other rotorcraft metrics such as speed, agility, reliability and shipboard compatibility.
Because the goals are so far-reaching, Newman says, Darpa decided to issue a “broad agency announcement” rather than a request for proposals, which would have required bidders to meet specific requirements. This approach allowed the government “to invest based on the value of each proposal.”
Boeing has been awarded a $3.62-million Phase 1 contract, Bell Boeing $2.86 million, and Sikorsky $5.9 million. Each team has selected a suite of adaptive technologies for its “point of departure” rotor system, but will assess and integrate these and others during Phase 1 to substantiate the benefits of an adaptive rotor, Newman says.
The MAR teams include “multiple small-technology providers, more than will be on the final design,” he says. Alternative approaches will be evaluated, their costs, benefits and risks assessed, and design of the objective rotor system revised based on results. “We stretched Phase 1 to 16 months to allow time for hardware bench tests to mature technologies,” Newman says.
One of the first tasks for the teams will be to adapt the analysis tools developed under HQP. “Every design tool assumes rotor parameters are fixed when it is built and never change. That is invalid [for MAR],” he says. “It is a much more challenging and complex design process.”
At the end of Phase 1, the teams will have established the benefits of adaptation versus a fixed design for a clean-sheet rotor; designed a demonstrator rotor to fly on an existing aircraft; and predicted the benefits of retrofitting an adaptive rotor to today’s rotorcraft. “That is not one of our metrics, but the customers are interested,” says Newman.
So far the U.S. Army, Navy and NASA are participating in the MAR program and providing some funding. The Air Force is “interested,” he says, “and will not be on the sideline.” During Phase 1, the agency plans to sign up services to which the rotor technology will be transitioned at the end of the demonstration program.
“Partnerships would allow us to expand technology development and that would play into competitive prototyping and the industrial base,” says Newman, as additional funding from the services could allow two or three rotors to be flown. “The program should fit well into the Defense Department’s planned Vertical Lift Consortium Initiative to fund research and develop enabling technologies for the next generation of rotorcraft,” says Flater.
Darpa previously studied, with mixed success, a number of advanced rotorcraft configurations such as the Canard Rotor/Wing, Heliplane and DiscRotor, but MAR is different. “This will not be a Darpa rotor. We are not building an asset. We have a single-minded focus on demonstrating the technology in flight, and we expect transition to be immediate,” says Newman.
“We expect the next rotorcraft program, whether it is JMR [Joint Multi-Role] or JFTL [Joint Future Theater Lift], will use this technology,” he says. “If one of these programs is to start in 2025, they need the technology by 2020.”
本文於 修改第 1 次