http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/p/2008-12-22/1002535879.html
俄最新反坦克火箭筒專破美軍主動防護系統
http://www.sina.com.cn 2008年12月22日 10:02 東方網
美國國防務新聞網12月18日報導稱,俄羅斯巴紮特公司已經成功研製出一種名為RPG-30的新型反坦克火箭筒,專門用於攻擊美軍裝甲車輛所配備的主動防護系統(APS)。
美國防務新聞網援引俄塔社的報導稱,RPG-30新型反坦克火箭筒首先會射出鄰接管內的一枚誘餌彈,隨後立即發射一枚串聯火箭彈。誘餌彈意在轉移主動防護系統——如美國陸軍的“硬殺傷”(Hard Kill)主動防護系統以及以色列的“戰利品”(Trophy)主動防護系統——的注意力,這樣串聯火箭彈就能夠對裝甲車輛進行連續攻擊。報導稱,巴紮特公司已經完成了該型火箭筒的研發及測試工作,未來幾個月將會交付俄羅斯及其他國家的軍隊。
美國陸軍訓練和條令司令部情報支持機構TRISA情報專家喬納森•普魯伊斯瑪稱:“RPG-30反坦克火箭筒配備有標準的105毫米串聯火箭彈。與其他火箭筒不同,RPG-30火箭筒會在發射主彈頭幾秒之前,先發射一枚誘餌彈或模擬彈藥。不過,從本質講,RPG-30仍是一種原型火箭筒。當前,俄羅斯正在大力推銷該火箭筒,意在把其打造成一種能夠摧毀爆破反應裝甲及主動防護系統的武器。”
普魯伊斯瑪稱,RPG-30反坦克火箭筒預定將於2015年入役,目前尚不清楚其是否能夠穿過美國陸軍的“硬殺傷”主動防護系統。美國陸軍的“硬殺傷”主動防護系統利用雷達辨別來襲武器,然後發射小型導彈將其摧毀。他說:“為摧毀目標,美軍主動防護系統需要向其發射足夠的彈藥,為此美軍的一些主動防護系統有時會配備多達20枚的導彈。有趣的是,俄羅斯人現在開始認為自己已經通過了美軍爆破裝甲及主動防護系統的挑戰,因此我們很好奇,他們將會進行怎樣的測試。”
華盛頓地區的防務智囊團——列克星敦研究院防務專案副總裁丹尼爾•古爾指出:“實際操作中所存在的問題是,該型火箭筒發射兩枚火箭彈的間隔,能否短到讓美軍主動防護系統的感測器無法對它們進行辨別,或者無法及時地進行兩次防護?”
不過,RPG-30反坦克火箭筒的出現仍表明,世界武器製造者已經開始對複雜的主動防護系統做出反應。他們對這些昂貴的防護系統所做出的反應,顯示21世紀昂貴的裝甲車輛的剋星便是這些便宜並且容易撒布的武器。古爾說:“利用二級發射管內的小型火箭彈,RPG-30反坦克火箭筒只需花費很少的成本,便可制服主動防護系統。現在,它們所裝備的炮彈已是能夠攻擊防護系統的兩倍。不過,進攻和防護系統之間的戰鬥從未結束。正如炮變得越大,裝甲車輛也隨著會變大一樣,這是一種迴圈,其中最為重要的就是要在措施公佈之前,先研製出針對其的反措施。”
普魯伊斯瑪說,巴紮特公司早期研製的串聯裝藥式RPG-29火箭筒——一種舊式3.5英寸火箭筒——已經在伊拉克摧毀了一些美制M1艾布拉姆斯坦克。2006年,真主党在黎巴嫩利用RPG-29火箭筒摧毀了一些以色列的梅卡瓦坦克。俄塔社文章指出,RPG-30火箭筒的威力遠勝其前輩。文章稱:“據專家估計,在躲避了主動防護系統之後,PG-30還能夠穿透厚度達650毫米的最新式的坦克裝甲、厚度超過1.5米的鋼筋混凝土、2米的磚牆以及近4米的木制障礙。這火箭筒能夠在戰鬥中摧毀任何種類的先進坦克,其他裝甲與非裝甲車輛,以及部隊與加固後的安全設施。”(北斗)
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3870566&c=LAN&s=ALL
Russia Unveils Anti-APS RPG
By kris osborn
Published: 18 Dec 18:36 EST (23:36 GMT)
Years before the U.S. Army will deploy its active protective system for armored vehicles, a Russian firm has unveiled a weapon designed to thwart it.
The RPG-30 fires a tandem-charge rocket-propelled grenade immediately after launching a decoy warhead in an adjoining tube, according to a Nov. 19 article by ITAR-TASS, the Russian news agency. The decoy is meant to distract an active protective system like the Army's Hard Kill and the Israeli Trophy so that the tandem charge can land a one-two punch against modern armor. Its developer, Moscow-based Basalt, has completed development and testing and will begin deliveries to Russian and other militaries in coming months, the news service reported.
"It has a standard 105mm tandem warhead, but what the difference is it has a decoy or a dummy charge that fires a few seconds ahead of the main warhead," said Jonathan Pruiksma, an intelligence specialist with the Army's TRADOC Intelligence Support Activity (TRISA), Wargaming, Experimentation, Test and Evaluation Directorate. "It is basically a prototype and they [the Russians] are advertising designed to defeat explosive reactive armor and active protection systems."
Pruiksma said it's not clear whether the RPG-30 will be able to get past the Army's Hard Kill active protection system, which is slated to enter service in 2015. Hard Kill uses radar to spot incoming weapons, then fires small missiles at them.
"In order to overwhelm it, you need to fire enough rounds at it. Some APS systems may have dozens of charges," he said. "What is interesting is they are starting to think through the challenges of explosive armor and active protection systems. It will be interesting to see how it tests."
One analyst noted that Hard Kill was designed to fight off multiple incoming weapons.
"The real operational question is: Can the two rounds launch in such close proximity to one another that the sensor cannot distinguish between the two or can't launch two defensive weapons in time?" said Daniel Goure, vice president of the Lexington Institute, a Va.-based think tank.
Nevertheless, the RPG-30's emergence shows how the world's arms makers are starting to react to complex active protective systems. Their reaction to these expensive protection systems mirrors the 21st-century reaction to expensive armored vehicles: inexpensive and easily dispersable weapons.
"With a small rocket in a secondary tube, the RPG-30 is nothing more complex than to try to overwhelm the defense with a cheap offense. They now have doubled the number of rounds they can fire at the defender," Goure said. "The battle between offense and defense never ends. Guns get bigger and armor gets bigger. This is another round of that, although one of the things that is significant is that the countermeasure is out before the measure is out."
Pruiksma said Basalt's earlier tandem-charge RPG-29 - "an old 3.5-inch bazooka" - had damaged some U.S. M1 Abrams tanks in Iraq. Hezbollah used the RPG-29 to damage some Israeli Merkava tanks in Lebanon in 2006.
The ITAR-TASS article called the RPG-30 much more destructive than its predecessor.
"Experts estimate that RPG-30 penetrates up to 650 millimeters of most modern tank armor after piercing reactive armor, more than 1.5 meters of steel reinforced concrete barriers, 2 meters of brick and nearly 4 meters of wooden barriers. Evasion from this grenade is virtually impossible," the ITAR-TASS article said. "In combat, this grenade launcher is capable of destroying any types up of advanced tanks (and known prototypes), other armored and non-armored vehicles, as well as the live force and secure reinforced compounds."