http://www.dsti.net/News/54379.htm
美眾議院武裝部隊委員會通過再生產12架F-22戰鬥機的決議
[據美國《防務新聞》2009年6月17日報導] 儘管F-22“猛禽”隱身戰鬥機未參與真實作戰,但是在眾議院武裝部隊委員會6月17日淩晨的表決中,F-22經歷了“生與死”的鬥爭。
就2010年國防預算問題爭論了16個小時之後,疲憊的委員會成員在淩晨2點30分進行了表決,以31票對30票的表決結果同意延續F-22專案,同時決定為另外採購12架F-22提供3.69億美元的預付定金。
美國國防部長羅伯特•蓋茨本想以187架的採購數量結束F-22戰鬥機的生產,但是眾議院議員否決了他。
3.69億美元的預付定金將用於新購12架“猛禽”戰鬥機的部件先期採購,而這些“猛禽”的最終花費約28億美元。
一名眾議院助理聲稱,這些先期採購資金來源於能源部用於清除核武器站的資金預算。
儘管F-22是美國空軍最先進、最昂貴的戰鬥機,但是F-22從未投入實戰。蓋茨部長在國會上曾多次重複強調這一點。
當蓋茨部長4月6日宣佈結束F-22戰鬥機停產時,他說:“並非我本人要關閉F-22的生產線。我從空軍得到的建議是沒有多於187架F-22的軍事需求。”
以前,美國空軍稱需要381架F-22戰鬥機。最近,在蓋茨將F-22的生產上限定為187架時美國空軍將需求數量降至了243架。
這份挽救F-22的修正案是由來自猶他州的共和黨議員Rob Bishop提出的。Bishop的助手說:“我們非常願意為新購12架F-22戰鬥機提供全部的資金。”但是,武裝部隊委員會主席Ike Skelton(共和黨議員)否決了在2010財年國防預算中申請全部資金的提議。
Bishop的助手稱,Bishop之所以能夠將本應用於國防環境核武器站清除的3.69億美元挪用於F-22,是因為這些核武器站清除工作比原計劃提前了或是它們的風險沒有達到必需在2010撥付資金的程度。這已經完全能夠保證F-22的生產線免於關閉,但是Bishop和其他委員會成員相信美國空軍對F-22的需求遠不止這12架。(中國航空工業發展研究中心 蘇海軍)
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4144686&c=AME&s=AIR
F-22 Funds Approved in Wee-Hours Vote
By william matthews
Published: 17 Jun 2009 17:04
It hasn't flown in combat yet, but the F-22 stealth fighter prevailed in a life-or-death battle in an early-morning vote June 17 by the House Armed Services Committee.
After more than 16 hours of squabbling over the 2010 defense budget, weary committee members voted 31-30 at 2:30 a.m. to keep the F-22 program alive by making a $369 million down payment on 12 more planes.
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates had intended to end F-22 production at 187 fighters, but House lawmakers overruled him.
The $369 million would buy advance procurement parts to begin production on a dozen new fighters. Ultimately, the planes would cost about $2.8 billion.
The advance procurement money would be taken from funds budgeted for Energy Department cleanups at nuclear weapons sites, a House aide said.
Although it is the Air Force's most advanced and most expensive fighter, the F-22 has never been flown in combat, a point Gates has stressed repeatedly in appearances before Congress.
When he announced April 6 that he wanted to end F-22 production, Gates said, "For me, it was not a close call. … The military advice that I got was that there is no military requirement for numbers of F-22s beyond the 187."
In the past, the Air Force has said it needed 381 F-22s. More recently it lowered the number to 243 until Gates put a 187-plane cap on the program.
But the fighter is popular in Congress, where it is praised as providing the Air Force with a high-tech advantage over potential foes, and is prized for creating jobs. Plane maker Lockheed has emphasized that the F-22 program employees 25,000 workers directly and another 90,000 in companies that produce F-22 parts in 44 states.
The amendment to save the F-22 was introduced by Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah.
"We would liked to have funded a full buy of 12 aircraft," an aide to Bishop said. But Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Ike Skelton prohibited amendments that would add to the overall cost of the defense budget.
Bishop was able to shift $369 million for the F-22s from defense environmental cleanups at sites that are projected to be ahead of schedule or are at risk of not being able to spend money allocated for 2010, the aide said.
It's enough to keep the F-22 production line from shutting down, but Bishop and others on the committee believe the Air Force needs more than 12 additional F-22s, he said.
While the Armed Services Committee was saving future F-22s, the full House approved spending $600 million to buy the final four planes that Gates wants. Money for those planes is included in a $106 billion "emergency supplemental" bill used to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Language in that bill prohibits using the F-22 money to shut down the F-22 production line, and it permits the Defense Department to consider building a less capable version of the F-22 for sale overseas.
The war-funding bill thwarts Gates' efforts to end another aircraft program, the C-17 cargo plane.
Gates said the 205 C-17s that are already in the fleet or under construction are enough, and he included no money in the 2010 defense budget for additional C-17s. But the House and Senate added $2.7 billion to war-funding bill to buy eight C-17s and seven smaller C-130J cargo planes.
The additional C-17s are "pure pork," said Christopher Hellman, a defense budget analyst for the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. Buying more C-17s "can only be characterized as a jobs program."
And C-17 maker Boeing has done just that. In February the company boasted that C-17 production sustained 30,000 jobs in 43 states, with concentrations in California, Texas, Missouri and Connecticut.