民進黨無能無德、暴力貪汚、鎖國獨裁

但是，民進黨會賤招選舉

民進黨會買走路工

民進黨會買票，作票

民進黨會貪汚洗錢

用貪汚來的錢2000元就能買到一個靈魂

打倒民進黨不容易啊

是磨坊的騾子，就不要學當主人的竉物狗！

這騾子看到主人的竉物狗不用做事，

就得到主人的疼愛，牠看到這狗，一看到主人就趴到主人身上就往主人臉上舔，

主人高興的不得了。

牠想想，這狗不用做事，只做個動作，主人就那麼喜牠，也想如法炮製，

這會得到什麼結果，可想而知了！

這小例子是說，馬英九不用刻意去做到開欄所說的內容，但多聽基層的聲音是必要的。

連三級貧戶出身的陳水扁不用住到窮鄕僻壤，講話也可以讓綠營某些人感到親近，

這是因為他的用語，他的口音，與他基層的生活經驗...

不用刻意學這種！因為，無法學。

應該是要發展自已的特點，因為，你的特點就是你與人不一樣的地方，至於出身與環境，這是無法改變的。

應該是除了各方意見外，也多聽聽基層聲音，至於專業上的意見聽取，一定要有second opinion。

It is true that everybody’s life experience (encountering his ruler) laid the foundation of his (or her) political viewpoints. However, those “life experience” normally have many angles and layers. Not every one can fully grab the whole picture of his subtle life experience. Therefore, experience would eventually be condensed into emotions buried under one's rationality and later on popped up partially at an angle and strength depending on the stimuli. In the mean time, human being also has the capability to learn and to build up his own value system which will filter and guide his buried emotions to an appearance showing his standpoints on all aspects of life including politics. Please bear in mind that people are easily deceivable, because his learning process is heavily dependent on the information environment and the formation of his thinking process, which in terms depends on the education and public media. That's why a lot of political men are trying to control and manufacture such “information environment” using underground radio, whispering, biased papers/TV, and government propaganda. On one side, people are exaggerating and even distorting the “memory of suffering history”; on the other side, people are also beautifying and playing down their past misconducts.

If you talk about suffering, people who suffered are by no means limited to either they are living in north or south, new immigrants or old immigrants, or their favor are pan-green or pan-blue. (Although I do agree that there are some past rulers who took vast advantage of this land as we are seeing on today’s new rulers, the poverty has impacted almost all residents without discrepancy in Taiwan’s early stage since WWII and Chinese civil war. Even though I lived in the north, I could still clearly remember that, for many times when I was studying in the elementary school, I heard of my mother talking to my father “We don’t have enough money for tomorrow’s school tuition. What should I do?” during the midnight after we kids went to the bed. However, most of us still finished good education due to the KMT's policy of low tuition and universality of educational resource.) The difference of today’s political splits between Taiwan’s north and south are mainly stirred up over the modern public media by the current ruler utilizing the common bad experience of the past dictatorship. I think the difference of such “information environment” between north and south should top the reasons of contributing the split. Mao (毛澤東) has said 階級鬥爭一抓就靈. This concept worked very successfully for quite some time because people always have conflicts between social classes, which you can divide and conque. It lost the effect only until people in China were severely harmed by the consequence of following their so-called great leaders. I believe this slogan can be modified to fit today’s DPP: 愛台鬥爭一抓就靈 due to differences between Taiwanese background – dialects, father’s origin, jobs, personal favorites, etc. The ghost of bigotry never vanishes in human history.

What I try to emphasize here is that we need to let ourselves control our own memory (of experience) instead of letting others (either DPP or KMT) maneuver our memory. The choice is held in our own hands.

本文於 修改第 3 次

KMT下台後，農民的生活並沒有顯著的改善。尤其貧富的差距急速加大，資源落入少數財閥手中，政府甚至刻意政策配合劫貧濟富。事實顯示，民進黨當政之後與國民黨時期技術官僚的「均富」走向背道而馳。

更弔詭的是，民進黨許多天王爭相形容自己早年生活多麼清苦，在貧困中力爭上游，完成了高等教育。如果三級貧戶之子也能在國民黨統治中出人頭地，打鐵街的兒子也能到日本留學，在令人動容之餘，繼續痛罵國民黨時代多麼不公平難道沒有一絲絲諷刺？

南部人要的跟北部人本質上完全相同，就是安居樂業。政府的功能在創造一個能夠安居樂業的環境，人民感受到公平合理的對待，才會有整體的繁榮。馬英九的團隊如果一直陷溺在民進黨製造的「假台灣，假南部」論述裡，拚命反駁或者迎合對台灣發展沒有正面價值的「選舉語言」，即使當選，也不過換湯不換藥，台灣還是走不出民進黨的格局。

所謂本土派，自命為最正確的台灣人，這種心態就是分裂的軸心。從這種心態衍生出來的論述，激化了深綠和深藍兩極人馬的對立，才會形成今天台灣一談論公共議題就會被冠上藍綠色彩而失去焦點，停滯不前的現象。多數人對政治冷漠，其實不是冷漠，而是無力。無力分辨是非，無力判斷真偽，只好敬謝不敏或者嗤之以鼻。

執政者最希望的就是把監督者的正當性減少，台灣的執政者已經造就了一個奇蹟。他們操弄任何可以操弄的人事時地物，把學者，媒體，專家和職業團體盡量收編為外圍打手，共同鋪排出「本土政權對抗外來統治」的幻境，徹底瓦解了任何監督者( 遑論反對黨 )的正當性。從這一次民進黨初選的「台灣 V. 中國」荒謬劇看來，不只國民黨要掙脫這個五花大綁，而是整個台灣都該儘快唾棄這樣的「理性沉淪」。

不要小看南部人的判斷力。民進黨這種二元論述可以時髦個幾年，務實的南部人終歸要回到基本面找支撐。容我再說一遍，南部人跟北部人要的沒有什麼不一樣！

領納稅人的錢就是米蟲？

君豈可如此無限上綱…

真要無限上綱…只會搞得遍地烽火…

我知道也許你想說的是政治人物與公務員

(但這些人領錢還有付出勞力、工作)

一些弱勢的人(低收入戶、老農、老人、原住民、身心障礙者…等等)是只領錢而無付出…更別說納稅了(攤販也沒有納稅)…(但這些人我不敢說他們是米蟲…畢竟有法律說要給他們錢…基於民主法治國家對法律的尊重…也關懷弱勢的情操…)

也許是我誤會了…但君真要繼續污名化公職人物嗎？

君真要步入追隨奸巧的民進黨思維嗎？

====> 因为蓝明的受教育的程度比较高，南部的农民是听不懂太高深的话的，<<==

I agree with you about most of everything you said, except the statement above.

Reasons:

(1) The educational level doesn't draw a clear line between the pan-blue and the pan-green. Inseatd, it is the life experience. Through the life, some people just dislike the f**king KMT, while other just hate the f**king DPP. Fair enough! That's their life experience, but their NOT their education level.

(2) If you still believe "蓝明的受教育的程度比较高", do you understand why?

When KMT had been ruling Taiwan for long long time, they took away most of resources to feed themselves (their families, friends, buddies, wives, lovers, gangs, ass-kissers, ...etc.) and to raise their children with good education, while most of the poor and the helpless farmers were still struggling with their basic life need with their bare hands. For them, providing good education to their children was an expensive luxury! Hey, during those 50 years, someone had stepped on other;s shoulders...It is very unfair! That's why today many people still want to f**k KMT badly. I hope Mr. Ma understands this, otherwise he is a 2008 hopeless.

Hence, your statement is very false and inappropriate!

====> 因为蓝明的受教育的程度比较高，南部的农民是听不懂太高深的话的，<<==

I agree with you about most of everything you said, except the statement above.

Reasons:

(1) The educational level doesn't draw a clear line between the pan-blue and the pan-green. Inseatd, it is the life experience. Through the life, some people just dislike the f**king KMT, while other just hate the f**king DPP. Fair enough! That's their life experience, but their NOT their education level.

(2) If you still believe "蓝明的受教育的程度比较高", do you understand why?

When KMT had been ruling Taiwan for long long time, they took away most of resources to feed themselves (their families, friends, buddies, wives, lovers, gangs, ass-kissers, ...etc.) and to raise their children with good education, while most of the poor and the helpless farmers were still struggling with their basic life need with their bare hands. For them, providing good education to their children was an expensive luxury! Hey, during those 50 years, someone had stepped on other;s shoulders...It is very unfair! That's why today many people still want to f**k KMT badly. I hope Mr. Ma understands this, otherwise he is a 2008 hopeless.

Hence, your statement is very false and inappropriate!

你讲出了，南部中下人民的心愿！

马英九应该是全台湾人民的领袖，所以要关心所有人的民生问题！

马英九的贵族的形象是， 有待改善！如果你的子民中有50% 是很穷的农民，那如果你老是穿着西服，是很不被接受的，好像是个外人！

南部中下层的人民，也是把生活改善的希望寄托在民进党身上，觉得民进党的口号是为他们着想的，民进党的口号是很蛊惑人心的！

为什么不把他们争取过来呢？而且他们不像，蓝民，你的话蓝民都听得懂，因为蓝明的受教育的程度比较高，南部的农民是听不懂太高深的话的，怎么用通俗易懂的话 告诉他们，你是关心他们的生活的，而且你的政策是有利于他们自己和后代的，一定要倾听他们想要什么？告诉他们您能为他们做什么？ 请他们给你机会，来表达你对这块养育你的土地的爱！