網路城邦
回本城市首頁 中國星火論壇
市長:古士塔夫  副市長: lukacsGuoding
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會公共議題【中國星火論壇】城市/討論區/
討論區外交、軍事 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
科索沃獨立 帝國傀儡戲
 瀏覽888|回應5推薦3

周世瑀
等級:7
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (3)

lukacs
沙包
古士塔夫

二月十七日是科索沃獨立一週年紀念。今年三月二十四日則是北約以人道干涉為名入侵前南斯拉夫十週年。十七日當天,美國國務院和英國外交部必然會重申民主、人權為普世價值,西方國家支持科索沃獨立。國人熟知英美藉伊拉克擁有大規模毀滅性武器之名發動石油戰爭。殊不知布萊爾和柯林頓的窮兵黷武與小布希不遑多讓。二零零三年的伊拉克戰爭即為一九九九年南斯拉夫戰爭的翻版。英美未經聯合國授權即逕自派遣北約軍隊侵略南斯拉夫。美國國防部長科恩(William Cohen)言道,南斯拉夫的塞爾維亞政府屠戮科索沃省境內的阿爾巴尼亞人,造成十萬多人死亡。北約基於人道考量弔民伐罪。

北約發動侵略戰爭全為經濟利益。原因有三。其一,歐美財團對南斯拉夫的國營企業早有垂涎之意。南斯拉夫在蘇聯解體後仍維持廸托(Josip Broz Tito)時代舊制,拒絕私有化。科索沃省金、銀、鎘、錫、鉛等礦藏居歐洲之冠,礦業公司亦屬國營。英國於該地採礦始於一九二十年。北約入侵前,該礦區市值至少五十億美金。北約既以人道干涉之名興師,斷無空襲非軍事設施之理。然而北約連續空襲南斯拉夫七十八日期間,僅殲滅十四輛坦克。摧毀該國基礎建設則是豪不容情。巴士、醫院、學校、教堂、郵局、橋樑、公路、鐵路、電視台、煉油廠和三百七十二處國營企業工業設施無一倖免。北約維和部隊在戰爭結束後仍駐防科索沃,先成立臨時政府,再無償接收該省境內所有國營企業,含市值不菲的礦業公司。南斯拉夫為籌措巨額戰後重建費用,只得解僱國營企業五十萬員工,並將(除科索沃之外) 各處國有企業售予西方財團。

其二,柯林頓政府急欲染指科索沃。早在一九九三年八月,參議員拜登(即現任美國副總統)接受CNN訪問時即詆譭塞爾維亞民族為一幫殺嬰犯和強暴犯,南斯拉夫治下阿爾巴尼亞人苦不堪言。美國暗地於九八年金援科索沃解放組織(亦為科索沃境內最大販毒集團)武裝對抗南斯拉夫政府,導致兩方衝突不斷。英美遂以南斯拉夫政府犯下種族滅絕罪為藉口,強行北約人道干涉。北約至一九九九年三月二十四日起夜以繼日以貧化鈾彈,集束彈轟炸南斯拉夫大城,殺害數以千計塞爾維亞平民。空襲科索沃期間另造成八十六萬阿爾巴尼亞人流亡歐洲鄰國。南斯拉夫政府忿恨北約殺人如蓺,亦屠戮阿爾巴尼亞平民報復。北約最高指揮官克拉克(Wesley Clark)得意忘形地表示,北約空襲南斯拉夫後,塞爾維亞政府的反應早在北約意料之中。言下之意即是北約欲駐軍科索沃,但苦無藉口。南斯拉夫總統米洛塞維奇在北約空襲期間,犯下違反人道罪,北約即可順理成章占領科索沃。北約借刀殺人之計從前南斯拉夫國際刑事法庭審判可見端倪。該法庭只審理米洛塞維奇在北約轟炸南斯拉夫期間諸多罪狀原因無它。米洛塞維奇在北約侵略南斯拉夫之前,並未犯下種族滅絕罪、戰爭罪行或違反人道罪。簡言之,科索沃省阿爾巴尼亞平民既未遭難,何勞北約人道干涉?

其三,美國政治學者強生(Chalmers Johnson)指出,南斯拉夫軍隊在戰敗撤離科索沃省後,美軍即進駐該省西南方與阿爾巴尼亞及馬其頓接壤的領土。並由錢尼(即美國前副總統)擔任總裁的哈利伯頓(Halliburton)集團興建美國在越戰後最大和造價最昂貴的軍事基地,以維護美國石油利益。南斯拉夫戰爭六月十一日結束。同年十月底該基地即茖成。美國於一九九四年即與阿爾巴尼亞、馬其頓、保加利亞洽談鋪設石油管線的計劃。該投資計劃於二零零四案定案。嗣後由裏海(Caspian sea)運往西歐的石油即取道美國出資貫穿巴爾幹半島之油管。

台灣媒體不分藍綠,無不同聲頌揚「西方民主」國家,對英美政府罄竹難書的無恥行徑向來不深究。贊頌帝國主義只顯示台灣仍是個殖民地。

周世瑀為英國雪菲爾大學政治學博士候選人
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=53732&aid=3286633
 回應文章
印度也開始追討被拍賣的文物了
    回應給: 沙包(solpao) 推薦0


lukacs
等級:8
留言加入好友

 

Indian schoolchildren demand the return of personal items belonging to Mahatma Gandhi, due to be auctioned in New York this week.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/7920928.stm

可見印度也是崛起了...帛琉就不敢跟美英日追討什麼鳥了...如果有的話.

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=53732&aid=3312652
寧為強國狗,勿為弱國人
推薦1


沙包
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

lukacs

一個人的價值,抵得上億兩黃金

或者,野地的一株無名草?

要強大啊,要站起來啊,

這樣,你就擁有喜歡強權即是公理,

或者不喜歡的權利。

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=53732&aid=3312452
經濟學人指「火燒圓明園」只是中國宣傳之騙局
    回應給: 周世瑀(sychou2003) 推薦1


lukacs
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

沙包

21:06 GMT +00:00

Looting China: propaganda then and now
Posted by: Charlemagne
Categories: Europe and China

要旨:英法聯軍只是為了打開中國市場,但中方軍隊卻綁架泰晤士報記者等洋人。英法軍有所行動,人質即被殺害。聯軍只是為了報復才火燒圓明園。本來還要燒紫禁城,但是算了。

而且現場參與搶奪財寶的也有中國土匪,又不是只有英法軍人?無數中方財寶在拳亂、文革中被毀,中國歷屆政府從不反省,卻利用「掠奪圓明園」的假故事強化中國愛國教條。


IT IS striking how some grudges can survive 149 years. A Chinese art expert has become a patriotic hero in his native land for sabotaging the sale in Paris of two (to my mind rather ordinary) bronze animal heads which were looted by French and British troops from the Yuanmingyuan, or imperial summer palace in Beijing, way back in 1860, and which later found their way into the art collection of Yves Saint Laurent, the clothes designer. In a report of the tale today, the Times newspaper makes the point that the summer palace was ordered burned to the ground by the British commander, Lord Elgin, not as an act of vandalism, but as an act of calculated retribution, after Chinese imperial officers kidnapped, tortured and killed 12 members of a European diplomatic delegation, among them a correspondent for the Times, Thomas Bowlby.

Now this detail is worth mentioning. Chinese schoolchildren are taught about the sack of the summer palace as a proof of western perfidy and the weakness of the last imperial dynasty, the Qing, which was unable to prevent foreign barbarians from wreaking terrible humiliations on the Middle Kingdom. As a newspaper correspondent posted to Beijing from 1998 to 2002, Charlemagne remembers seeing solemn Chinese youths being taken round the ruins of the summer palace, as a key part of their patriotic education.

There is something admirable about the Times still standing up for its poor, murdered correspondent, nearly a century and a half on.

But the uncomfortable truth is also that neither the British, the French nor the Chinese should feel that good about the ruins of the summer palace. The attack on the Yuanmingyuan began before it was known for sure that the foreign hostages were killed, as part of a messy power-play in the closing stages of the second opium war, an unedifying episode that was essentially about the outside world demanding access to the closed Chinese kingdom at a moment of Chinese weakness. A couple of days after the first assault on the palace, the foreign hostages' deaths were announced, at which point the burning of the summer palace was ordered in retribution. The destruction was dressed up as an act of rough justice, but an awful lot of soldiers and officers simply helped themselves to the astonishing treasures that lay before them. A Pekinese dog was among the haul: presented later to Queen Victoria, it was re-named "Looty", in honour of the manner in which it reached British shores.

Even then, eyewitness accounts record that at least officers and eye-witnesses felt ashamed of the destruction. It is said that the western forces briefly pondered burning the Forbidden City in the heart of Beijing, but decided against, judging that the loss of that palace would be a humiliation that would bring down the imperial dynasty, in a messy fashion that would not suit western interests.

But Chinese history books, in their haste to draw neat lessons that favour the Communist Party as creators of a new, strong China, downplay persuasive evidence that local Chinese also joined in the looting, and that further destruction awaited the palace, at the hands of the fanatical Boxer sect during their 1900 uprising, and then again during the Cultural Revolution unleashed by Chairman Mao.

Pierre Bergé, the partner of the late Mr Saint Laurent, has been accused of playing politics, when he offered to give the bronze animal heads to China, just as soon as Tibetans gained greater freedom and autonomy. Yet these sculptures were always more political than artistic. They were created, after all, by Jesuit missionaries sent to China to impress the emperor with the west's sophistication, in the hope that this would win acceptance for Christianity. They were then looted in very murky circumstances, and have now been elevated to patriotic talking points by a modern-day state propaganda machine. Other heads from an original collection of 12 have over the years been bought by Chinese businesses linked to the People's Liberation Army, and a casino owner from Macau, for presentation to the Chinese people as patriotic gifts.

I recommend as background reading a blog posting by a former colleague and friend, Richard Spencer, who is the Daily Telegraph's Beijing correspondent.

(經濟學人寫出這種東西,真是可悲。同理,巴格達亞述博物館被劫,因為也有當地土匪參加,所以美英又沒有責任了。何況海珊與當地激進派殺害許多西方媒體人質,所以炸毀文物與清真寺設施也不必追究了。)

西方soft power衰落,不是沒有道理的。



本文於 修改第 2 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=53732&aid=3312220
這是一個沒有道理的世界
推薦0


安康公主
等級:6
留言加入好友

 

有的就實力

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=53732&aid=3287934
鼓掌!好文!
    回應給: 周世瑀(sychou2003) 推薦0


lukacs
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
就是太兇了,使得台灣腦殘的媒體有些難以下嚥?
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=53732&aid=3287857