網路城邦
回本城市首頁 中國星火論壇
市長:古士塔夫  副市長: lukacsGuoding
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會公共議題【中國星火論壇】城市/討論區/
討論區外交、軍事 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
Obama上台後美中台關係與外交政策蠡測
 瀏覽27,227|回應141推薦3

Guoding
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (3)

Guoding
沙包
lukacs

計劃趕不上變化,如果沒有九一一事件,小布希的外交政策肯定是會另一番面貌。本主題將貼出美國總統當選人外交政策預測,輔助"新冷戰"主題。

沈丁立實在講得過分了。

Wed Nov 5, 2008 12:10am EST

BEIJING, Nov 5 (Reuters) - Democrat Barack Obama's victory in the U.S. presidential election is likely to have major repercussions on relations with Asia. Here are some analysts' views on how they expect an Obama administration to affect ties.
For related story, click on [nN04356344]

JAPAN

Brad Glosserman, executive director of CSIS Pacific Forum, a regional security think tank in Hawaii:

"I think in many ways this represents an extraordinary opportunity for U.S.-Japan relations. The reason being that Obama's approach to security and international relations places great emphasis on a multilateral approach. I suggest that the relationship with Japan has depended too much on the military pillar of the alliance....It's a great chance for Japan to be a real engaged partner, but it requires Japan to articulate a vision and strategy that corresponds to the new thinking about the region.
But he added: "The Japanese are worried ... They are concerned that the don't have the relationships with the Democrats that they have had with the Republicans."

Koichi NAKANO, political science professor, Sophia University:

"Japanese conservative leaders have had an easier time dealing with Republicans than Democrats in the past so I'm sure they are worried. I don't know how much network building has been going on for the past year ... It's going to be a cultural adjustment."
He added: "I don't think the alliance will change much, at least immediately. The biggest issue facing both countries and the world is economic in nature and in dealing with the financial crisis. Ties with Japan will be valuable and Obama has many good people to draw on ... The Democrats in the past have been more into revitalising ties with China and this will be in the back of the minds of Japanese policy-makers."

CHINA
Tao Xie, U.S.-China relations expert at Beijing Foreign Studies University:

"For U.S.-China relations, I don't think it portends such significant change. If there would be any change at all, it would have to depend on at least a couple of more conditions. One, a big victory for the Democrats in the House and the Senate. And second, if there were to be exogenous events beyond people's expectations or control."
"Even if there are changes, there will be far fewer significant changes than symbolic changes. The Democrats in the House may be more active in sponsoring protectionist legislation, for example, Senator Charles Schumer of New York, trying to put more pressure on China. But that's more bark than bite."

賈慶國, expert on relations with the U.S. at Peking University:
"I don't think an Obama administration will make big changes in policy towards China. But there will be a shift in emphasis to more pressure on trade and currency issues, as well as human rights and the environment and climate change. I expect there'll be less friction over China as a traditional security threat.
"I don't think we'll see the usual lift in tensions (at the start of the administration). The international economic situation won't allow for that. Because the Democrats have been out of power for so long, there will be some friction, simply because they lack the familiarity with policy and mutual understandings that developed under eight years of Bush."

沈丁立, international security analyst at 復旦大學 in Shanghai:

"He is our man, I think. China wants to solve problems through international cooperation. The new president will create much more space for international cooperation than under Bush.
"Trade and fairness issues are going to be one point of contention, but overall this creates more opportunities for the two countries to cooperate."

TAIWAN

Alexander Huang(黃介正), strategic studies professor, Tamkang University, Taipei

"Obama will not just sit back and force American policy. China will feel they have a bigger voice in terms of discussing issues with the U.S. government. For Taiwan, (Obama's policy) depends primarily on who will be secretary of state and secretary of defence, whether they are people who are familiar with Asia or the China issue. Of course there are Taiwan supporters in the Democratic camp, so we hope Obama will appoint some to key positions in Asian affairs."


PAKISTAN

Shamshad Ahmed Khan, a former Pakistani foreign secretary:

"The whole world has been hooked on this presidential election, more than ever, the reason being the havoc the current incumbent president has played with the world over the past eight years.
"Everybody wants change in America's policies. Terrorism is an issue that is above party politics in Washington.
"Unfortunately, Pakistan finds itself in the eye of the storm so naturally Washington's policy focus will remain on Pakistan.
"There might be a nuanced change in application of that policy focus and that change will be in keeping with the Democratic philosophy, the conceptual approach compared with the beligerant attitude of the outgoing administration.
"Democrats have always behaved with restraint and engagement, they believe in engagement.
"Now that we have a democratic government in Pakistan, I'm sure the new president will shift the focus from direct military strikes and operations to greater political and economic engagement.

INDIA

C. Uday Bhaskar, strategic analyst in New Delhi:

"While Mr Obama represents change in the U.S., for the U.S.-India bilateral relationship, the big change has already taken place over the nuclear issue." (The Bush administration reached an agreement with India over nuclear energy cooperation). "India-United States relations till recently were shaped by the nuclear issue, the next big ticket item is countering terrorism and state support to this phenomenon."

SOUTH KOREA

Kim Sung-Han, professor of international relations at Korea University in Seoul:

"For the past several years, the Bush administration was preoccupied with Iraq and the Middle East. In the meantime, China has approached Southeast Asia and has been established as the champion of Asian multilateralism and regionalism.
"Obama needs to pay more attention to Asia. He will put more emphasis on Asian policy, particularly the regionalist policy. And the other (priorities) are pretty obvious such as China, Japan and South Korean policy, with China being high on the agenda."
Chun Bong-geun, expert at Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security in Seoul, affiliated with the Foreign Ministry, said progress was expected in negotiations on the nuclear issue and also for Korea peace talks.
"Looking from his reaction to terrorism delisting, Obama has indicated a more active engagement in dialogue with North Korea. For him, dialogue itself is not an incentive and reward for the North, as it was for Bush and even Clinton, but dialogue is meant to solve problems.
"But if Obama tries to focus on human rights, dialogue could get bogged down again."

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=53732&aid=3100585
 回應文章 頁/共15頁 回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁
Obama to Borrow China's Wealth, Clout in Effort to Steady World
推薦0


Guoding
等級:8
留言加入好友

 

哈佛大學麥克法夸爾教授說,要對中國政治秩序如有重大崩潰,做應變方案,可是美國大概對俄羅斯都沒這樣的方案,可見美國人不太想相信北京政權穩固。美現任駐中國大使Clark Randt是歷任駐華任期最久的大使。

By Indira A.R. Lakshmanan

Dec. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Thirty years ago this month, President Jimmy Carter held secret negotiations to establish formal diplomatic ties with a poor, insular communist China. President-elect Barack Obama will inherit a relationship with a China whose wealth and influence are essential to rescuing the world economy.

Resolving almost any international problem now -- from reducing North Korea’s potential nuclear threat to slowing global warming -- requires Beijing’s cooperation. The financial crisis also underscores China’s importance: Its $1.9 trillion in foreign reserves will be indispensable in helping to avert a global economic meltdown.

While this means China will likely get immediate attention from Obama, the new president probably won’t reorient U.S. policy toward the world’s fourth-largest economy.

Factory closures and job losses in Michigan and China’s Guangdong province “vividly remind us how interdependent our countries are now,” says Susan Shirk, a former deputy assistant secretary of state for China who has advised both Obama and Hillary Clinton his choice for secretary of state. “Although this could lead to conflict and friction, it also gives the U.S. a strong incentive to cooperate with China.”

Every president since Carter has come to office lambasting Beijing about espionage, unfair trade practices, violations of human rights and threats to Taiwan -- before being compelled to work with the Chinese government on common interests.

Less Confrontation

Obama may be the first to start out less confrontationally. During George W. Bush’s presidency, the two countries have forged unprecedented lines of communication, forming working groups on Africa and Latin America and holding economic summits like one last week with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.

The current administration “has handled the U.S.-China relationship perhaps better than any bilateral relationship of the last seven years,” says Ken Lieberthal, a former national security adviser on Asia under President Bill Clinton who advised Hillary Clinton, 61, and then Obama, 47, during the presidential campaign.

Even so, “mutual distrust about both sides’ intentions has grown,” says Lieberthal, 65, a visiting scholar at the Brookings Institution in Washington.

Thwart Growth

On a recent trip to Beijing, he says he discovered that many Chinese -- officials and ordinary citizens -- believe the U.S. purposely triggered a global financial crisis to thwart China’s growth. Likewise, many Americans assume a stronger China would marginalize the U.S.

“Each side hedges against what they fear the other might try to do,” Lieberthal says.

As economic conditions worsen, both countries are under pressure at home to protect their domestic markets. Obama spoke out during the campaign against what he called unfair trade practices and currency manipulation, which has left Chinese policy makers nervous about his intentions. China, meanwhile, is shielding its own economy by slowing the appreciation of the yuan against the U.S. dollar and giving Chinese exporters a larger tax rebate.

With the U.S. now officially in a recession, China holds more cards than it did even a few months ago. Washington is more reliant on Beijing -- the largest holder of U.S. Treasuries -- to buy more government securities to finance deficit spending. China’s massive trade surplus has enabled it to accumulate more foreign-currency reserves than any other nation, according to Bloomberg data.

‘A Lot of Cash’

“It’s one of the few players in the world, besides the Saudis, who is sitting on a lot of cash and can help save the international financial system,” says Victor Shih, author of “Factions and Finance in China.”

Some fear America’s reliance on China’s money means the White House will bite its tongue when the country acts against U.S. interests or values.

If there were not a global recession and crisis, I would expect the Obama administration to take a stronger stand on Tibet and human rights,” says Shih, a professor at Northwestern University near Chicago.

The upside of interdependence is that the two nations should be less likely now to take punitive measures against each other, says Nicholas Lardy, an economist who specializes in China at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington.

No Incentive

There’s no incentive for China to stop buying U.S. securities; it needs a safe investment for dollar reserves, and its growth depends on the health of the U.S. economy. Congress also may hesitate before demanding trade barriers against a country that’s the main source of cheap goods for budget- conscious consumers.

The Communist Party’s legitimacy rests on its ability to deliver rising standards of living, without which the government’s grip on power becomes tenuous, China watchers say. So the country’s leaders have reason to worry about an economic slowdown that is pushing growth below the estimated 8 percent a year economists say is needed to create enough jobs for its citizens. Authorities are also anxious about rising discontent and daily protests over corruption, unemployment, housing and tainted food.

Obama should have a contingency plan for “what we would do if there’s a major collapse of the political order,” says Roderick MacFarquhar, a China scholar at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

China-Savvy Advisers

The president-elect will be able to turn for help to the China-savvy individuals he has brought into his circle. Timothy Geithner, 47, Obama’s choice for Treasury secretary, studied Chinese and has lived in China. His transition team includes Jeffrey Bader, a China specialist with a 27-year career in government that spans trade and national security.

Among the possible candidates for ambassador are John L. Thornton, a former chairman of Goldman Sachs Asia who has been a professor in Beijing; Richard Holbrooke, 67, who dealt with China as Clinton’s United Nations ambassador; and Shirk, 63, a visiting fellow at the Asia Society in New York.

Lieberthal expects Obama’s administration will engage Beijing in what he describes as “critical transnational issues of the 21st century.”

Interdependence will work to both countries’ advantage, Shirk says, “if it motivates us to do our best to cooperate rather than taking potshots.”

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=53732&aid=3143135
頁/共15頁 回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁