網路城邦
回本城市首頁 不平則鳴
市長:麥芽糖  副市長: 一葉孤鴻*Jackey*逸名blackjack
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【不平則鳴】城市/討論區/
討論區中美爭霸 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
美國大謊言? TWA 800 被擊落?
 瀏覽1,239|回應2推薦1

麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (1)

胡說八道

美國的誠信, 非常的可疑!

這幾位人士所說, 是否可信?

OK

We all know USA is NOT telling truth about many things. Could this whistle blower be true?

TWA Flight 800 crash not due to gas tank explosion, former investigators say

The reconstruction of TWA Flight 800's fuselage. (Daniel Brooks/Epix)

The producers of an upcoming documentary on TWA Flight 800—which exploded and crashed into the waters off Long Island, N.Y., on July 17, 1996, killing all 230 people on board—claim to have proof that a missile caused the Paris-bound flight to crash. And six former investigators who took part in the film say there was a cover-up and want the case reopened.

"There was a lack of coordination and willful denial of information," Hank Hughes, a senior accident investigator for the National Transportation Safety Board, said on Wednesday during a conference call with reporters. "There were 755 witnesses. At no time was information provided by the witnesses shared by the FBI."

Jim Speer, an accident investigator at the time of the crash for the Airline Pilots Association, who sifted through the recovered wreckage in a hangar, said he discovered holes consistent with those that would be formed by a high-energy blast in the right wing. He requested it be tested for explosives. When the test came back positive, he said, he was "physically removed" from a room by two CIA agents.

The investigators would not speculate on the reasons for the alleged coverup or who would have fired the missile that they believe took down the plane.

After a four-year investigation, the NTSB concluded the plane was destroyed by a center fuel tank explosion likely caused by a spark from faulty wiring. But according to Tom Stalcup, a co-producer of the documentary, the film presents new "radar and forensic evidence proving that one or more ordnance explosions outside the aircraft caused the crash." The film will premiere on EPIX on July 17, the 17th anniversary of the disaster.

"These investigators were not allowed to speak to the public or refute any comments made by their superiors and/or NTSB and FBI officials about their work at the time of the official investigation," anews release announcing the documentary said. "They waited until after retirement to reveal how the official conclusion by the (NTSB) was falsified and lay out their case."

The investigators filed a petition with the NTSB on Wednesday calling for a new probe. The NTSB had said it would review any petition related to the 1996 crash, which touched off one of the most complex air disaster investigations in U.S. history.

The CIA and FBI conducted a parallel investigation to determine if a bomb or missile had brought down the plane.

Dozens of eyewitnesses in the Long Island area "recalled seeing something resembling a flare or firework ascend and culminate in an explosion," the CIA said in a 2008 report. "Had the crash been the result of state-sponsored terrorism, it would have been considered an act of war." Also from the report:

The CIA responded to the FBI’s request within 24 hours of the crash. This support consisted primarily of help from the Counterterrorist Center in the Directorate of Operations and from a small group of analysts in the Office of Weapons, Technology and Proliferation in the Directorate of Intelligence.

But after an eight-month investigation, the CIA "concluded with confidence and full substantiation that the eyewitnesses had not seen a missile."

The CIA's deputy director of intelligence wrote in a 1997 memo,"Our analysis demonstrates that the eyewitness sightings of greatest concern to us—the ones originally interpreted to be of a possible missile attack—took place after the first of several explosions aboard the aircraft."

"We went back and interviewed these people and found them to be quite credible," Hughes said on Wednesday.

He added: "We have no hidden agenda here; we just want the truth."






本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=4977173
 回應文章
揭密!美國空難史上最大的陰謀
推薦1


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢

真相竟是如此...
‪#‎軍事拼圖‬

環球航空800號班機(TWA800)是一班從美國紐約肯尼迪國際機場起飛,中途停留在法國巴黎戴高樂機場,目的地為義大利羅馬-菲烏米奇諾機場的環球航空班機。1996年7月17日,班機搭載著212名乘客及18名機組人員前往法國巴黎,在起飛後…
PHOTO.CHINATIMES.COM|BY CHINA TIMES



回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=5443250
首度承認? 馬上又說謊!
推薦1


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

文武兩邊站, 可可疊羅漢

呵呵!

連美國的小孩子都知道: 這個 Roswell Area 51 是幽浮研究大本營!

美國政府愛說謊, 真是狗改不了吃屎!

最新 | 發燒 | 哇新聞 
| 字級:
美政府首度承認有「51區」…與幽浮無關

美國喬治華盛頓大學的國家安全檔案館15日出版「U-2的神秘歷史」電子書,書中提到美國政府在一份解密的中情局報告中首度承認,俗稱「51區」的內華達州南部沙漠謎樣的軍事基地確實存在,但與幽浮無關。(英國每日郵報)

「51區」地圖
圖/擷自Secret History of the U-2

※延伸閱讀/
美國喬治華盛頓大學/The Secret History of the U-2

【2013/08/16 聯合報】http://udn.com/



全文網址: 美政府首度承認有「51區」…與幽浮無關 | 國際 | 即時新聞 | 聯合新聞網 http://udn.com/NEWS/BREAKINGNEWS/BREAKINGNEWS5/8101365.shtml#ixzz2cAZNdHgz 
Power By udn.com 

51區沒幽浮 外星迷不相信

圖為幽浮想像繪圖,小圖為51區禁止進入和拍照的告示牌。
圖為幽浮想像繪圖,小圖為51區禁止進入和拍照的告示牌。

新解密的美國中情局檔案證實「51區」存在,但沒有提到任何外星人或幽浮事件。不過陰謀論沒有就此打住,幽浮迷仍深信政府掩蓋真相,希望51區員工有朝一日公布「真相」。

數十年來,以「51區」為中心的傳聞引發關於幽浮和外星太空船實驗的陰謀論。國家安全檔案館(National Security Archives)資深研究員李徹森(Jeffrey Richelson)申請公開紀錄後,中情局終於揭開「51區」的神祕面紗。

美國政府在新解密的中央情報局(CIA)U-2偵察機計畫歷史檔案裡,承認「51區」的存在,地點在拉斯維拉斯西北方約130公里處,但表示這裡中情局在1950年代試飛U-2高海拔偵察機等極機密飛機的地點。

不過自稱幽浮專家的佛里曼(Stanton Friedman)說:「說U-2能解釋當時目擊者看到的大部分現象,簡直胡說八道。U-2能停在空中、在半空中直角轉彎、從空無一物的地方起飛嗎?這些U-2都做不到。」

深信自己曾與外星人接觸過的幽浮迷赫溫斯(Audrey Hewins)說:「我認為他們可能是在試水溫,試探民眾對大謊言、掩蓋真相的反應。」

美聯社說,這份407頁的報告不可能阻止陰謀論繼續延燒。報告裡許多地方遭塗抹,誰敢說這些地方沒有提到小小綠綠的外星人?

有些幽浮迷認為,最驚天動地的爆料不會來自政府檔案,而將出自「51區」員工之口。幽浮研究員哈斯汀(Robert Hastings)說:「我認為飛過這些飛機的人會打破沉默,在未來某天出面說明。中情局不會透露他們不想談的事情。」

U-2偵察機是設計來在高海拔偵察蘇聯情報,美國一直對開發U-2一事保密。

1950年代,商用客機飛行高度介於1萬英尺到2萬英尺之間,B-47這類戰機的飛行高度低於4萬英尺。但報告說,U-2戰機飛行高度超過6萬英尺,因此內華達沙漠出現不明飛行物體的傳聞開始如雨後春筍般湧現。

目擊幽浮的傳聞多出自傍晚飛行的商用客機機師之口,因為U-2銀色機翼會反射天空高處的陽光,從某個海拔高度來看,會以為U-2是超越人類駕駛機種所能飛行高度的「燃燒物體」。

空軍官員為了避免極機密U-2計畫曝光,只好解釋說這些景像只是自然現象。

報告說,1950年代後期和1960年代大部分時期的幽浮傳聞中,「U-2和其他偵察機占了超過一半」。1020817

關鍵字:U-2





本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=4999485