網路城邦
回本城市首頁 不平則鳴
市長:麥芽糖  副市長: 一葉孤鴻*Jackey*逸名blackjack
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【不平則鳴】城市/討論區/
討論區太公的荊洲 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
您以為人民的眼睛是龍眼珠﹖
 瀏覽619|回應1推薦1

曾太公
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

China and the U.S.: Dysfunctional Real Estate Bubble Twins
  (January 21, 2010)


China and the U.S. share two central traits: a financial-command-economy and an addiction to cheap, easy money to prop up bubbles that serve the status quo.

Despite the many obvious differences between the Chinese and American systems of governance and "capitalism," there are two key similarities. We might phrase this thusly: China's leadership has empowered specific strains of capitalism to serve the party's socialist goals, while the American leadership has socialized the mortgage/housing/banking sectors to serve its predatory-capitalist Masters (the financial-rentier Power Elite).

***  ****  ***

近年來﹐常常用政治學角度﹐看太平洋兩岸兩大國﹐總覺得在言語界﹐談伊娘的『姓社姓資』﹐沒啥實際意義。

數月前﹐重溫自由派大師G氏一書如附圖﹐不知『他是在左﹐我仍在右』﹐還是我老眼昏花沒看懂﹐只覺柳暗花明﹐隱然見有同一光景『穩合存在』﹐均見著低痞(Predator)橫行現世﹐心有悽悽焉。

不管人說何為『物質天堂』﹐何為『人權地獄』﹐再如何以學術觀察﹐這兩邊大地﹐還是似曾相識﹐有著『百步﹑五十』的相似性﹐不說是『狼狽兄弟』﹐但總可以說有著『雙胞胎』的雛形。

若假設地球有百億年的存在﹐再如Andrew Tobias一般﹐也假定一百年為一英吋﹐人類初現﹐該在八﹑九百英里前。而人的社會如此富有﹐也只不過是眼皮前一吋而已﹔但不管唯物唯心﹐同樣辯証法說的『正反合』﹐在我們小鼻小眼的眼皮前﹐不知歷史重演『正正反反﹑分分合合』若干回合﹖

最近一回﹐看看兩邊﹐在我們眼前六十分之一吋處﹐也就是一年前吧﹖那邊有高等士族師爺華碩人高喊『小馬旋風』﹐這邊有『奧婆馬光環』﹐大叫『不輸』下台﹐呼天喚地起『風騷』﹔這何等風光﹗誰知今日全演出『華鐵爐』﹐一則遭拌馬繩﹐三大立委選舉全摃龜﹐由藍轉綠﹔一則『鐵得甘乃迪』保有五十年的自由派議席鐵票﹐換人又變天﹔現在面臨重選的同黨議員﹐﹐面對人民慘叫的巨大壓力﹐也幾乎都皮皮剉﹐改口批判婆偏心權貴。

唉﹐沒有定性正略﹐只會左倒右歪迎合﹐您以為人民的眼睛是龍眼珠﹖

講到龍﹐唉﹗感觸良深﹐同胞是龍的傳人乎﹖

唉﹐不說是牛鬼蛇神﹐淺水王八多﹐華蛇多多﹔就說是『油舌滑嘴肥皂沫』變色龍不少吧。遙想當年﹐有一藝人﹐心向中華民國﹐天天往台灣﹐取個台灣美『嬌』娘﹐有鳳相伴﹐不成龍亦難喔﹖成為台灣李小龍之外﹐最名響的『龍傳人』﹐而今呢﹖有沒棄『嬌』﹐心向上海二奶水呢﹖伊娘列﹗君且暫莫言『戲子無情婊子無義』那俗套看看陳華回憶錄吧)﹐蓋此一時彼一時﹐當年大陸只能演江青樣板戲﹐那有他扮『小丑雜耍』的空間﹖看他今日站前﹐口口愛中國﹐真心愛國嗎﹖唉﹗說穿了﹐演場戲﹐跟著捧﹐有奶是娘﹐西瓜偎大邊耳。

今日得見一文﹐伊娘列﹗真是以文會友﹐咱有知己乎﹖引以為記。


雲遊去了﹐有緣自聚

本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3815121
 回應文章
For the good of the people?
推薦1


曾太公
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=adYcyuIIIJiI

Jan. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Stocks extended losses after Reid’s support for Bernanke wavered earlier in the day and two other Democrats who face re- election this year, Barbara Boxer of California and Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, said they will oppose the 56-year-old former Princeton economist.

Bernanke has drawn fire from some lawmakers for lax regulation of banks prior to the financial crisis and for bailouts of firms such as American International Group Inc. The Democratic party’s loss of a seat in Massachusetts this week has added to pressure on those senators facing re-election at a time of rising voter anger over the economy.

Christopher Dodd, the Senate Banking Committee chairman who proposes stripping the Fed of banking supervision authority, renewed his support for the Fed chief today. He said rejecting him would send the “worst signal to the markets right now” and produce an economic “tailspin.”

“This is the most important central banker in the world,” said Dodd, a Democrat from Connecticut.

(ET's note: Ouch! Isn't this the same tone as "too big to fail" for Wall street cats or bankers?  Or "too powerful to fail" toward philipine people a few years ago?  Eeven today, how come those politicians don't get the true picture what is good for the people.)  

“Bernanke is viewed by markets around the world as a positive for the U.S. economy and the uncertainty about his reconfirmation is accelerating today’s sell-off,” said Michael Holland, who oversees more than $4 billion as chairman of Holland & Co. in New York. 

 (ET's note: Uncertainty? Give me a break! Who has injected the biggest "uncertainty" in American daily economic life to make the "certainty" of market forces no longer exists? Now you are talking about "uncertainty." Did I tell you so?  That's two years passed for you to realize it, right?)

 

Nevada Poll

Reid faces re-election this fall in his home state of Nevada, where a Public Policy Polling survey conducted Jan. 11- 12 showed him trailing two possible Republican opponents by at least eight percentage points.

Boxer, in a statement, said she won’t support Bernanke because “our next Federal Reserve Chairman must represent a clean break from the failed policies of the past.”



本文於 修改第 3 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3815359