網路城邦
回本城市首頁 不平則鳴
市長:麥芽糖  副市長: 一葉孤鴻*Jackey*逸名blackjack
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【不平則鳴】城市/討論區/
討論區經濟 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
經濟的道理: 國者人之積!
 瀏覽5,237|回應14推薦0

麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友
麥芽糖在公司, 準備貨物, 催帳, 跟衙門打官司, 忙得不可開交.
忽見太公好文:
引用曾太公文章坐直升機從上猛丟錢﹐能違人性﹐錢自然往下流﹐而『恩澤下民』﹖

引用文章美國參院的狗屎大菜

公經濟只是私經濟的分枝﹐私經濟為『一切經濟』的根本﹐其力量大大遠遠超過公經濟﹐而今各國真的是本末倒置﹐比中國唐朝体制『強枝弱幹』還糟﹐完全棄根本的 people's power 主要力量及作用。這也是太公在『新年一望﹕一個中國﹐有那麼可怕﹑難解嗎﹖』一文中﹐暗諭『從上往下可鎮山﹐由下往上能撐天』一語的意思。

對老美權貴眼光﹐只放在上流社會﹐坐直升機從上猛丟錢施德政﹐又言如此可以能『恩澤下民』﹐實際上無視廣大小草民『民不潦生』﹐只見朱門酒肉臭﹐早已很有感觸。


想到一個笑話:
李登輝, 阿斗等人, 搭直昇機, 從上猛丟錢施德政﹐比較誰讓多點人高興.
這個笑話, 不但把布希和奧婆媽, 以及臺灣的老人年金和最近的三千六, 給形容入木三分.
最後, 那個駕駛那句話最傳神:
把政客丟下去, 所有的人民, 都粉高興!



回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3253603
 回應文章 頁/共2頁 回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁
對抗當前經濟危機的建議:在全台灣廣設中華民國失業家庭庇護中心
    回應給: 麥芽糖(myata) 推薦0


馬敦樺(業餘經濟研究者)
等級:4
留言加入好友

 
全球性經濟危機來襲,台灣正面臨空前國難。在此緊要關頭,為了千千萬萬台灣人民的幸福,請詳閱:
對抗當前經濟危機的建議:在全台灣廣設中華民國失業家庭庇護中心
新國家經濟建設方案:以政府補助來鼓勵國民實現團體生活
請多多推薦、連結、轉寄、和轉貼這兩篇文章。早一天實現這兩篇文章的願景,就是拯救全台灣幾十個成人小孩免於自殺和消除全台灣幾百件治安案件。早十天實現這兩篇文章的願景,就是拯救全台灣幾百個成人小孩免於自殺和消除全台灣幾千件治安案件。
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3264778
餵魚和教捕魚
    回應給: 曾太公(et13808) 推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
呵呵!
太公把英文的諺語用上啦!
問題是: 沒有任何事情是絕對的.
孩子小, 啥都不會, 就用餵的.
長大了會跑能釣魚, 才教他們捕魚.
布希, 奧婆媽和馬總統:
臺灣和美國, 不是嗷嗷待哺的嬰兒, 別拿小紅包來買聖主名聲! 好好教人民: 如何束緊褲帶, 面對小月吧!





本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3264767
引用者清單(1)
2009/02/10 05:31 【曾太公落美洲】 解鈴還得繫鈴法
It Is Called "Class Hate," Very Popular Now
推薦1


曾太公
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

Homeownership bubble deflating

On the surface, you and everyone here are right to the point: the tax credit is a baloney...

However, I am an incurable optimist... 

What I mean is only if we can think about the saying, "Don't give them fish, teach them how to fishing" enough to change our present ways to giving out social entitlement or welfare, we are able to switch those politicians' "Top Down" approach into "Bottom Up" medicine.  Then, we can be proud of ourselves to say: "We create a more fair and equal society ever existed since no one is rejected to own a home if he so wishes."

I have a dream that everyone has his sweet home someday very soon if Obama is able to be on the right track.   But, I am sorry, I have to say he is lost in the jungle, at least for now.


I agree -- top down has not worked and will not work for this.  It needs to be a bottom up. However, its the people at the top making the decision and right now those people are scared and have a "lets take care of ME first and then YOU" mentality.

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3264664
no use of pointing at a bullshit without a solution
    回應給: 麥芽糖(myata) 推薦1


曾太公
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

Homeownership bubble deflating  

On the surface, you and everyone here are right to the point: the tax credit is a baloney since few people can buy a house under the current financial reality.  If you guys are not complaining, it is, still at best, no use of pointing at a problem without a doable solution.

However, I am an incurable optimist.  When I look at it from other angle, I believe the trend of home ownership is NOT going to be shut off.  There is no way for us to go back to the past.  Even it is correcting, it will easily and definitely go back to even higher lever, i.e., more home ownership and less tenant if we can do it right. 

What I mean is only if we can think about the saying, "Don't give them fish, teach them how to fishing" enough to change our present ways to giving out social entitlement or welfare, we are able to switch those politicians' "Top Down" approach into "Bottom Up" medicine.  Then, we can be proud of ourselves to say: "We create a more fair and equal society ever existed since no one is rejected to own a home if he so wishes."

I have a dream that everyone has his sweet home someday very soon if Obama is able to be on the right track.   But, I am sorry, I have to say he is lost in the jungle, at least for now.



本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50539&aid=3258856
頁/共2頁 回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁