Strong Push for an RTC-Type Solution to the Crisis
Just two days earlier, Treasury officials had said no broader entity was needed
"Lesson No. 1 from that era is: Move quickly. Troubled assets don't become more valuable over time; they become less valuable," said Richard Breeden, the RTC's architect and a former Securities & Exchange Commission chairman.
呵呵呵﹗三天前﹐破而遜想要擁有絕對的行政權﹐能獨斷決定如何動支八千億美元﹐不受法律或國會管制﹐把設立RTC方案刷掉﹐不肯加以考慮﹔這樣大獨裁的雄心﹐怎麼兩天就挫敗退卻啦﹖
您以為老美像老中那樣﹐西瓜偎大邊﹐效忠執政者﹐歌功頌德中共啊﹖不信乎﹖最近有位什麼齋的歪市網友﹐對中國股市大跌﹐中共提什麼三方案﹐讚佩有加﹐差點要捧胡兄的屁股猛吻。對吧﹖伊娘列﹗中共的『單邊証交稅』等三方案﹐是頭痛醫頭﹐能有個啥屁戰略鳥用﹖
太公很高興﹐在美國﹐總算有人看到我心中的藥方之一﹐提出私人企業經營的RTC方案﹔但這只是一道緩劑而己﹐對健全金融流通﹐振興經濟﹐增加就業﹐還是緩不劑急喔。
唉﹗老美就別這樣老大﹐看北歐最民主的瑞典﹑挪威﹐在八十年代經濟危機﹐是如何將銀行國有化的嘛﹗再笨﹐也學學房地產買賣生意的基本規則﹐像市井小民那樣﹐go to the basics﹗能有點人腦﹐分辨啥是經濟學所言的 goodwill﹖啥是badwill﹖
伊娘列﹗沒必要﹐也就別蠢到對世界放言﹐要買盡所有銀行的
bad assets 啦。沒人會把您老美當英雄喔﹗《那會當啥啊﹖如台灣軍購案般﹐被當凱子還好﹐是當成呆子喔﹗》
本文於 修改第 2 次