網路城邦
回本城市首頁 他山之石
市長:麥芽糖  副市長: blackjack
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【他山之石】城市/討論區/
討論區世界亂源: 美國 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
Obama: 內外夾攻, 陣前換將, 法官造反?
 瀏覽2,881|回應21推薦0

麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友
臺灣很多人, 喜歡拿美國總統奧八碼先生做例子, 來責難馬總統.

今天, 奧總統卻是內外夾攻.


御筆欽點的阿富汗戰爭, 一年內二度陣前換將. 因為在外的將軍, 不給老闆面子, 跟媒體說他的壞話: 不重視, 不支持! 說了些雞毛蒜皮的事情, 卻違反軍人有耳無嘴(Don't ask, don't tell!) 的金科玉律. 奧老大震怒, 馬上十二道金牌召回, 訓斥一番, 收了他的辭呈!


呵呵! 馬侃說今日的伊拉克戰爭, 是韓戰翻版. 奧總統矢志: 伊拉克撤軍, 阿富汗堅持打到贏! 自己卻宋高宗和秦檜一起幹了!


就別提家裡失火: 利用海上油田污染, 下令不準近海開挖油田, 被法官判定違法!


油田污染事件, 不幫忙控制污染, 還口花花說要處罰英國油公司, 讓自己的親信, 主持分發罰款, 賠償民眾, 進行買票. 真是一本萬利? 卻在環保上, 遭受重愴:


奧總統一直說: 要石油公司 吐出利潤! 終於抓到英國油公司, 卻在小動作上, 被法官給擺了一道!







本文於 修改第 4 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4023257
 回應文章 頁/共3頁 回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁
中央社: 歐巴馬打壓新聞自由
推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
維基解密:歐巴馬打壓新聞自由

維基解密(WikiLeaks)創辦人亞桑傑(Julian Assange)指控美國總統歐巴馬試圖打壓新聞自由。他說,歐巴馬政府曾有逮捕揭密者的紀錄,並已成為「一個不認同新聞自由、也沒有表現出它認同新聞自由的政體」。

據英國「每日電訊報」(Daily Telegraph)報導,39歲的亞桑傑從倫敦一處秘密地點拍攝的手機短片中,發表上述評論。他因涉嫌性侵而成為國際逮捕令的目標後,一直避免曝光,一反稍早旗下網站爆料後隨即召開記者會的高調作風。

亞桑傑因涉嫌性侵兩名女子而被通緝,一旦被捕恐遭羈押並且遣返瑞典。

亞桑傑否認所有犯罪指控,駁斥這是遭人惡意「抹黑」。他的律師曾表示,涉案女子與亞桑傑的確發生性關係,但是出於自願。

接近亞桑傑的消息人士說,他因為擔心性侵指控會轉移外界對網站揭密的注意力,所以遠離聚光燈。

消息人士說,倫敦都會區警察局(MetropolitanPolice)優先處理涉及謀殺或性侵指控的國際逮捕令,如果發現亞桑傑的出沒處,警方會設法逮捕他。

美國司法部長霍德(Eric Holder)表示,目前已針對維基解密公布美國機密文件一事,「積極並持續進行刑事調查」。

【2010/11/30 中央社】http://udn.com/




回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4302005
歡迎
    回應給: 带头大哥(gtalk) 推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
歡迎带头大哥:

請解釋那裡不解?


回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4280051
不解
推薦0


gtalk
等級:
留言加入好友

 
表示不解
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4279584
國會對總統的反攻: 倡導停止法案附加條件!
推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
這不是黨爭 而是國會針對總統的反攻: 倡導停止法案附加條件!

法案附加條件 是當時希拉蕊和麥肯提出來攻擊嘔八馬的主要武器!


Top Senate Republican joins push to stop earmarks

Mitch McConnellAP – FILE - In this Nov. 3, 2010, file photo Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky. takes part in a …

WASHINGTON – Cementing a significant challenge to the ways of Congress, the top Republican in the Senate on Monday fell into line behind demands by House leaders and tea party activists for a moratorium on pork-barrel projects known as "earmarks."

Earmarking is the longtime Washington practice in which lawmakers insert money for home-state projects like road and bridge work into spending bills. Critics say that peppering most spending bills with hundreds or even thousands of such projects creates a go-along-get-along mindset that ensures that Washington spending goes unchecked.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who has long defended the practice, said he's now heeding the message that voters sent in midterm elections that swept Democrats from power in the House. He said he can't accuse Democrats of ignoring the wishes of the American people and then be guilty of the same thing.

McConnell's move heads off a battle with conservative Republicansenators who had signaled that they would force a vote Tuesday on banning the practice. That vote is now a formality.

"Nearly every day that the Senate's been in session for the past two years, I have come down to this spot and said that Democrats are ignoring the wishes of the American people," McConnell said in a surprise announcement from the Senate floor. "When it comes to earmarks, I won't be guilty of the same thing."

House GOP leaders had already endorsed a ban on earmarking, and McConnell's move signaled a recognition that earmarks were on their way out.

McConnell, a 26-year veteran of the Senate and longtime member of the Appropriations Committee, had argued in the past that banning earmarks would shift too much power to President Barack Obama and wouldn't save taxpayers any money.

"I know the good that has come from the projects I have helped support throughout my state. I don't apologize for them," he said. "But there is simply no doubt that the abuse of this practice has caused Americans to view it as a symbol of the waste and the out-of-control spending that every Republican in Washington is determined to fight."

Obama endorsed an earmark ban in his Saturday radio and Internet address, saying that "in these challenging days, we can't afford" them.

Just hours before McConnell spoke, Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., promoted the ban in remarks to tea party activists at a Capitol rally.

"Tomorrow, the Republicans in the Senate are going to start answering that question: Have we learned our lesson? Are we going to go a different way?" DeMint said. "If the Senate Republicans fail to pass a ban on earmarks tomorrow, obviously they have not gotten the message."

McConnell's move also forestalls a possible fight with the House, where Speaker-to-be John Boehner, R-Ohio, poised to become the most powerful Republican in Washington, had put people on notice that there won't be any earmarks in spending bills.

"House and Senate Republican leaders are listening to the American people and are united in support of an earmark ban. "This is a strong first step — though only a first step — towards making the tough choices required to get our country back on track."

McConnell's move came as a relief to colleagues caught in the middle of a behind-the-scenes battle between Senate traditionalists and tea party favorites like DeMint and Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., who have joined with Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in a longtime battle — and thus far a losing one — against the bipartisan practice of earmarking.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., who voluntarily gave up earmarking last year, praised the move.

"That's great," Corker said. "Sounds like the issue is behind us."

All but a few of the 13-member GOP freshman class made campaign pledges that they wouldn't seek earmarks. But some of them were reluctant to get caught in the middle between DeMint and McConnell on whether they would support DeMint's proposal for a ban on earmarks in the session of Congress that starts in January.

It also was not lost on incumbents that among the new members of the class is Mike Lee, a Utah Republican who defeated Sen. Robert Bennett in state party caucuses earlier this year that were dominated by tea party activists.

Coburn made waves Monday in an interview with the conservative Weekly Standard in which he endorsed future primary challenges of Republicans who partake in earmarking.

McConnell said most earmarks have merit, such as a project he sponsored to clean up the Bluegrass Army Depot, "which houses some of the deadliest materials and chemical weapons on earth." His success in sending money home to Kentucky played a role in his 2008 re-election bid.

But earmarks have become larger-than-life symbols of wasteful Washington spending, such as the $200 million-plus "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska, a project that was later canceled.

Earmarks also are blamed for a "pay to play" culture in which lobbyists and business executives seeking earmarks lubricate the system with campaign contributions.




回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4274053
良禽擇木?
    回應給: 老石頭-old rock(cmchu) 推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
謝謝!

老丐兒時讀三國, 對於天下大亂, 群雄逐鹿的時代, 蠻有分嚮往. 還記得: 曹操的部將, 打不過許褚, 派人挖角, 就用了"良禽擇木, 良臣擇主"來打動他.

拿林彪來說: 在黃埔, 他也算是蔣"校長"附近的人. 選擇到八路軍去, 有他的抉擇, 也給他更大的空間. 但是最後, 還是難逃一死! 毛澤東根本算清楚要他死, 還說了"天要下雨, 娘要改嫁, 隨他去吧!"的漂亮謊話! 呵呵! 高處不勝寒呀!

近代留行制憲, 不管是君主立憲, 還是民主立憲, 都是希望寫下清楚的規則. 完全是針對"人心難測", 位高權重的人, 對於下面的人, 要擺佈易如反掌!

人身難得, 到底此生有些甚麼功課與使命, 誰知道呢?

但求仰天俯地, 庶幾無愧.

顯赫的戰功雖然顯眼, 但是安身立命, 上知天地宇宙, 下明人心, 才是更值得努力的. 也比較容易面對自己的命運!



回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4119947
是! 不是! 沒有理由!.軍人當然要服從,也無從選擇!
推薦1


老石頭-old rock
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

回顧國共內戰,變節的要多過服從的,.貪生的要多過犧牲的,.奉承的要多過敢言的,

老驥伏櫪,志在千里,烈士暮年,壯心不己.

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4119827
形勢比人強
    回應給: 老石頭-old rock(cmchu) 推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
軍人是要服從領導, 不管誰比較有功勞!



回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4113933
美蘇都打過阿富汗,真正的內幕為何?檔案未公開,無人拿的準!
推薦1


老石頭-old rock
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

我一直都認為地球不是平的,所以這通往世界和平的道路是高低起伏,綿延婉轉不斷,站立在各個不同的角落看問題,也就會產生各不相同的眼光,我們中國人說:人不為己,天殊地滅!,不要老是抱怨別人強大就是帝國主義,自己卻不莊敬自強!.回顧我們的古代歷史-唐,宋,元,明,清等朝代,不也都曾耀武揚威過嗎!

再談中國的近代遭到政治人物罷黜進而凋零的典型代表在大陸的就是彭大將軍德懷,在台灣就是孫立人將軍,.而現在,在美國又看了一位有如麥帥與巴頓將軍的歷史從演,怎不令人唏噓呀!

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4111047
引用者清單(1)
2010/08/12 11:54 【中國論壇】 趙括現象: 美國流行選舉沒有經驗的候選人!
岳飛 張巡
    回應給: 老石頭-old rock(cmchu) 推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
謝謝老石頭-old rock(cmchu)網友:

出師未捷被罷黜, 長使英雄覺氣短.

岳飛, 張巡, 是被犧牲的良將.

美國這個大欺小的遊戲戰爭, 不過是奪人油田的小把戲.

對於您這樣子的革命軍人, 正是物傷其類, 兔死狐悲!

抽煙斗的, 不知道對手是誰! 彭德懷已經厲害, 毛澤東還遙控! 艾森豪的牽制, 不過是無能掌握國內政局, 當然是個輸面. 好在: 贏的是炎黃子孫!

唉!



回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4110434
麥克阿瑟將軍說:老兵不死,只是凋零!
推薦1


老石頭-old rock
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

這個"凋零"的內函就是"令人深惡痛絕的三聲無奈",一個投身軍旅三,四十年為國家出生入死 的將軍,沒有死在沙場,卻毀在一位未服過兵役,上過戰場,而每四年一選的總統政客憲法上的三軍統帥,你心甘嗎?你服氣嗎?
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=3221&aid=4110121
引用者清單(1)
2010/08/10 02:27 【他山之石】 將軍不知政壇險, 誤把記者當知己.
頁/共3頁 回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁