網路城邦
回本城市首頁 時事論壇
市長:胡卜凱  副市長:
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【時事論壇】城市/討論區/
討論區全球經濟網 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
中國企業成功祕訣 -- Lloyd Lee
 瀏覽145|回應1推薦1

胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (1)

胡卜凱

Rivian CEO says the company tore down a highly popular Chinese EV. Here's what he thought.

Lloyd Lee, 10/23/25

*  Rivian isn't in the Chinese market, but it still pays attention to EVs abroad.
*  CEO RJ Scaringe told BI that the company tore down a Xiaomi SU7 to learn what's inside.
*  The CEO said the SU7 is "nicely done," but there's nothing new to learn from it.

Rivian doesn't have a footprint in China's highly competitive EV market, where companies like BYD and Xiaomi reign supreme.

That doesn't mean the California-based EV maker isn't paying close attention to the world abroad.

In an interview with Business Insider, 
Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe said the company tore down a Xiaomi SU7, a highly popular EV sedan in China, as part of an industry-standard practice of benchmarking other vehicles in the market.

The SU7 is the Chinese smartphone juggernaut's success story. It was launched in early 2024 with a starting price tag of $30,000 and helped Xiaomi blow past its 
annual delivery expectations by November of the same year.

The car was praised by 
Ford CEO Jim Farley. Business Insider previously wrote that the SU7 delivered on performance. After Rivian took a look, Scaringe agrees.

"I'd say it's a really well executed, heavily vertically-integrated technology platform," Scaringe said, referring to how the company develops the car's tech stack in-house. "Nicely done."

The CEO said the SU7 would be one of the cars he'd consider buying if he were living in China — that is, of course, since Rivian's not there.

However, Scaringe said there's no secret sauce inside the car that makes the SU7 cheap and a runaway success in the country.

"Cost — we understood how they've arrived there," Scaringe said, adding that "there's nothing we learned from the teardown."

The CEO points to macroeconomic factors like the low cost of labor and the Chinese government's support for EVs.

"The cost of capital is zero or negative, meaning they get paid to put up plants," Scaringe said of Chinese companies. "It's a very different opportunity."

Scaringe added that, while the US has provided loans, the idea of a production plant being supported through a government grant is "just not something that exists in the US."

The Department of Energy announced in January a $6.6 billion loan to support Rivian's new manufacturing plant in Georgia.

A mix of looser regulatory hurdles, lower labor costs, and more government subsidies allow China to churn out 
more affordable electric cars, Travis Fisher, director of energy and environmental policy studies at the Cato Institute, previously told Business Insider.

"When you take the cost of capital down to zero or less than zero and you have a cost of labor that's very low — you can do the math, you can build a spreadsheet that can arrive at exactly how they're doing it," Scaringe said.

It's a factor that the Rivian CEO said he wished more people talked about to de-mystify why China's rate of electrification surpasses that of the US.

"I think it's like Wizard of Oz," he said. "I think when people think there's a Wizard of Oz, it's not helpful. It's like there is no magic in the world. Everything could be analyzed and calculated."


Read the original article on 
Business Insider

本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=7287373
 回應文章
《國資之殤》觀後 -- 胡承渝
推薦1


胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

胡卜凱

國資之殤

胡承渝,2025/10/22

公營與私營的爭論,由來已久。西漢時的一次大辯論,紀錄在《鹽鐵論》一書中。這可能是全世界第一本專門記載公、私營辯論的專書。

主張鹽、鐡國營的桑弘羊說:私營造成奢侈富豪,對平民不公,對國家不利。

主張私營的儒生則說:國營的產品價格高而質量差,不合人民需要;而且官員以之聚斂集財。雙方的論點,到現在還不失其合理性。

1950
年代,中國經過公私合營的步驟,把一切工商業都收歸國有。固然消滅了資本家對工人的剝削,阻止他們聚集巨大財富;但國營公司的僵化,也限制了生產力的發展。所以改革開放後,又要發展私有經濟,而公私合營也成為一個手段。不過這次公私合營的目的與開國時相反,不是要消滅私營事業,而是想以私營公司的活力,配合國營事業的實力,各取所長,實現「中國特色的社會主義」。

這項政策對中國經濟的發展,確實有重大的貢獻。但也成為某些人轉移國營財產的手段。這個視頻就以最近的「娃哈哈」和「萬科集團」為例,分析他們的手法。


請參考視頻:國資之殤 -- 娃哈哈、萬科啟示錄【湯山老王】


編後記:

這是胡承渝先生看了《國資之殤》視頻之後,在另一個論壇寫的短評。我一直很敬佩承渝兄的見解;稍微做了段落和標點符號的更改後轉刊於此。標題中的「觀後」兩字是我加上的。

這個議題很重要,希望大家參予討論。

本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=7287432