|
波蘭擊落侵入領空俄國無人機 -- Alan Charlish等
|
瀏覽658 |回應3 |推薦1 |
|
|
|
莽撞乎?烏龍乎?試探乎?捅馬蜂窩乎? 相關閱讀: The attack on Poland is a Nato Article 5 situation. The Alliance must respond Hysterical reactions over Russia’s drone incursion are a disservice to NATO 從這兩篇評論南轅北轍的「標題」可以看出,我常常說的:「凡論述必有前提;凡判斷必有立場」還真是老人言。 Poland downs drones in its airspace, becoming first NATO member to fire during war in Ukraine Alan Charlish/Lidia Kelly/Barbara Erling, 09/11/25 Summary * Companies * LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: * Donald Trump speaks with Polish president * Drone crashes into pensioner's house in eastern Polish village * US commander of NATO: response demonstrates resolve to defend allied territory WARSAW/WYRYKI-WOLA, Poland, Sept 10 (Reuters) - Poland shot down suspected Russian drones in its airspace on Wednesday with the backing of aircraft from its NATO allies, the first time a member of the Western military alliance is known to have fired shots during Russia's war in Ukraine. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk told parliament it was "the closest we have been to open conflict since World War Two," though he also said he had "no reason to believe we're on the brink of war." Polish F-16 fighter jets, Dutch F-35s, Italian AWACS surveillance planes, and NATO mid-air refuelling aircraft scrambled in an operation to shoot down drones entering Polish airspace from Tuesday evening until morning, officials said. One drone smashed into pensioner Tomasz Wesolowski's two-storey brick house in the eastern Polish village of Wyryki-Wola at 6:30 a.m. while he was downstairs watching news about the incursion. The roof was destroyed, and debris was strewn across the bedroom. Wesolowski told Reuters the house "needs to be demolished." A blackened spot in a field elsewhere in southeastern Poland showed where some other drones had fallen. MOSCOW DENIES RESPONSIBILITY Moscow denied responsibility for the incident, with a senior diplomat in Poland saying the drones had come from the direction of Ukraine. Russia's Defence Ministry said its drones had carried out a major attack on military facilities in western Ukraine, but it had not planned to hit any targets in Poland. U.S. President Donald Trump spoke with Polish President Karol Nawrocki, a conservative nationalist and political ally whom Trump hosted at the White House last week. "This conversation is part of a series of consultations I've been conducting with our allies," Nawrocki said in a post on X. "Today's talks reaffirmed our unity." Ahead of the phone call, Trump posted on social media: "What’s with Russia violating Poland’s airspace with drones? Here we go!" He did not elaborate. The leaders of France, Britain, Germany, and Canada were among the NATO leaders to condemn the suspected Russian incursion in strong terms. European leaders, who have been trying to persuade Trump to join them in tightening sanctions on Russia and boosting support for Kyiv, said it justified a collective response. Poland said 19 objects had entered its airspace during a large Russian air attack on Ukraine, and that it had shot down those posing a threat. Tusk called the incident a "large-scale provocation" and said he had activated Article 4 of NATO's treaty, under which alliance members can demand consultations with their allies. Neither Poland nor NATO has yet given a full account of what they suspect the drones were doing. One senior military source said at least five of the drones' flight paths indicated they were headed towards Rzeszow airport, NATO's main hub for arms supplies to Ukraine. TESTING NATO CAPABILITIES? The source said Russia may have been testing the capabilities of NATO's air defences and warning systems. NATO declined to comment on whether that was its assessment, referring the question to NATO chief Mark Rutte's remarks earlier when he said an investigation was ongoing but that the incursion was "absolutely reckless." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said, after speaking by phone to Tusk, Rutte, and other European leaders, that the drone incursion into Poland meant Europe had to work on creating a joint air defence. Andrey Ordash, Russia's charge d'affaires in Poland, was cited by the RIA state news agency as calling accusations of an incursion "groundless" and said Poland had not given any evidence that the drones shot down were of Russian origin. The Kremlin declined to comment directly on the incident, but spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the EU and NATO "accuse Russia of provocations on a daily basis. Most of the time without even trying to present at least some kind of argument." During the incident, the Operational Command of the Polish Armed Forces urged residents to stay home, with three eastern regions at particular risk. Several Polish airports were temporarily closed, including Rzeszow, which has been used as the main access point for Western officials and supplies travelling to Ukraine overland. The suspected incursion was conducted at least in part with Gerbera drones, according to a Polish army official. It is a cheap long-range drone that Ukrainian intelligence says is made of plywood and foam and assembled from kits supplied by Chinese manufacturer Skywalker Technology at Russia's vast Yelabuga facility. Countries bordering Ukraine have reported occasional Russian missiles or drones entering their airspace in the past during the war, but not on such a large scale, and they are not known to have shot them down. Two people were killed in Poland in 2022 by a Ukrainian air defence missile that went astray. Since NATO’s creation in 1949, Article 4 has been invoked seven times, most recently in February 2022 following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. "This is going to shock the NATO alliance and the border countries, they're all in the same situation," said Riki Ellison, an expert on missile defence close to U.S. and allied military forces. "It's not the beginning of World War Three, but it's evolving Russia's understanding of how we fight and our weaknesses, and the weaknesses of the alliance." Russia has long said it has no intention of stoking a war with NATO and that Western European countries suggesting it is a threat were trying to worsen relations. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called for more sanctions on Russia, and said the EU was preparing sanctions on "shadow fleet" tankers that transport its oil and third countries that buy it. Trump, who warmly welcomed Putin in Alaska at a summit in August, said over the weekend he was ready to move to a second phase of sanctioning Russia after months of talks about a peace deal. Reporting by Lidia Kelly, David Shepardson, Steve Gorman, Andrea Shalal, Alan Charlish, Marek Strzelecki, Pawel Florkiewicz, Sabine Siebold, Andrew Gray, Karol Badohal, Barbara Erling, Katharine Jackson, Ryan Patrick Jones, Jeff Mason, Max Hunder and Ron Popeski; Writing by Lidia Kelly, Matthias Williams and Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Peter Graff, Jon Boyle, Rod Nickel Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.
本文於 修改第 1 次
|
「30年河東,30年河西」之英國與波蘭 -- Tim Wigmore
|
|
|
推薦2 |
|
|
|
過去三年間波蘭也以「抗俄援烏」第一男配角身份出現在國際舞台上(本欄開欄文)。也請參見此欄2025/05/20貼文。 Poland was once a ‘communist, third-world country’. Now, it’s overtaking Britain The European superpower is luring a record number of UK immigrants with its restored economy and robust patriotism Tim Wigmore, 01/08/26 Three months ago, the British businessman, Johnny Mercer, advertised a marketing role in his construction firm, Polstrad, based in Poland. “[Not long ago,] people weren’t interested in moving here,” says Mercer, as he sits down in Charlotte Bouillon, a trendy French bistro that opened in central Warsaw in 2019. This time, however, Mercer was inundated with Britons eager to work in Poland. Thirty-five applicants for the job were British and happy to relocate permanently – including one, without any Polish links, who got the job. The traditional migration flow between Poland and the UK has been reversed. In the year to June, just 7,000 Polish nationals moved to the UK. Meanwhile, 3.5 times as many – 25,000 – emigrated and returned to Poland. And the Poles are not leaving Britain alone. Since 2020, the number of people with UK passports living in Poland has soared from 113,000 to 185,000. Such a surge reflects the growing optimism in Poland, a contrast to the mood in most of Western Europe. “This is the golden era of the Polish economy and the golden era of Poland,” says Jadwiga Emilewicz, who recently served as deputy prime minister. “For the last 200 years, we have been the country of emigration. Nowadays, we are becoming one of the most attractive destinations for immigrants, including from the United Kingdom.” In 2000, Poland’s GDP per capita – the average economic output per person – was 42.7 per cent of that in the UK. In the 25 years since, Poland’s GDP per capita has soared to $45,113 (£33,565) – 85.9 per cent of the UK’s. And the trend is not stopping there. Average household income in Poland is forecast to exceed the UK’s in 2031. Julia Chelminska is among the Britons to move to Poland in recent years. Born and raised in London to two Polish parents, Chelminska, 33, moved to Warsaw three years ago, shortly before having her first child. She is not surprised by the influx from Britain. “With the economy, the food, the city centre, the fancy restaurants, you’re thinking, ‘Wow, that looks good – I’m not losing anything,’” Chelminska reflects. “I’m not going to a communist third-world country, which is sort of what Poland felt like 15 years ago.” It’s not just the economy. The attraction for Britons, she says, is cultural too. “You had the wave of Poles come to the UK. Britons know what Poles are like – we’ve been neighbours. There’s a symbiosis. “It’s easy for Britons to think, ‘Oh, it’s a two-hour flight away. I see the quality of life feels better there. I already know Poles, so I can get on with them. They speak English anyway, and I like pierogi [stuffed dumplings].’” Affordable cost of living More than anything, Chelminska was attracted to the cheaper cost of living. Her three-storey house with a garden in Warsaw costs less than a two-bedroom, ex-council flat in London. A pint costs 10zł (£2). Yet there are other reasons why she considers Poland a better place than the UK to start a family. Parental leave is fully transferable between couples. Chelminska, who was not working at the time she gave birth, was able to transfer eight-and-a-half months of her maternity leave to her husband. All families also receive 800zł (£160) a month per child from the government, which is not means-tested. Chelminska feels safer, too. Her old ground-floor apartment in Shepherd’s Bush was broken into three times. In Poland, she has never been the victim of any crime. As a young woman, Chelminska has become used to walking alone in Warsaw. She unthinkingly did the same on a recent trip to London. “I was out quite late in an area where my friend was like, ‘What are you doing walking at this hour?’ She didn’t think I’d be safe.” Elektrownia Powiśle, a power plant a mile from the centre, was long a symbol of Warsaw life. It remains an emblem of the city – but now of its dynamism, not its dreariness. The plant’s characteristic grey chimneys have been rebuilt, fusing contemporary architecture with the industrial past. In 2021, the building, previously fenced off, reopened as a trendy street food hall. Inside, locals choose between Vietnamese, Thai, Japanese, Indian, Mexican, Lebanese and Italian cuisine, and much else besides. I, too, am viscerally aware of Poland’s transformation. My mother, a Polish native, maiden name Batyra, was 27 when, having met my father, she moved back to Britain in 1985. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, I visited Warsaw almost every year to see my grandparents. When I walked through the front door of their house, I would be greeted by rosol, traditional Polish chicken soup. The highlight of my trips was the visit to the black market, the largest in Central Europe, located on the disused, old national sports stadium near the River Vistula. Each weekend, hundreds of pop-up stores extended all the way around the top of the seating. But it only thrived because the selection of goods available in the shops was so sparse. No longer. The market shut down in 2008, when the old stadium was dismantled. Now, it is the site of the new gleaming National Stadium, which seats 58,000 people, another huge marker of Warsaw’s broader transformation. Instead of dull, monochrome buildings, there is a new effervescence to the city’s skyline. The streets are dotted with construction sites, and the roads in the city are either new or being upgraded. This is the visual evidence of Poland’s total GDP growth – the second highest in the world, behind only China, since the end of communism in 1989, according to the International Monetary Fund. Businessmen who operate across the German-Polish border now say that transport links are often better on the Polish side – Pendolino trains, travelling at up to 125mph, link up major cities. Only last month, Volkswagen announced plans to expand its factories in western Poland, which is the only place where the company manufactures the Crafter electric van. The Mercedes Sprinter plant also recently relocated from Germany to Poland. “Bad times create strong people,” says Emilewicz, who was born in 1974, some 16 years before the end of communism in the country. She says that, in some ways, the dilapidated communist inheritance helped inspire this determination to modernise. “We really started from scratch. This willingness to upgrade the way of life was very strong in my generation.” For some, it is that determination that marks today’s Poland out from Britain.
Philip Warda, 33, was based in Britain until moving to Poland three years ago. He recalls the motto of a close friend in secondary school back in London, “‘I can’t be bothered.’ It was so cool to be lazy,” he says. “In Poland, people do complain, but they work – there’s this mentality of, ‘We’ve got to get something done.’” Soaring performance in education Poland’s educational performance in the international rankings has soared since 2000, which has been credited to measures like lowering the age at which students start school and pre-school. Reforms also delayed the start of vocational programmes to raise minimum standards of literacy and numeracy. My grandparents could scarcely speak English, leaving me to try and communicate with them in my shoddy Polish. But the standards of English among young people today are such that ambitious parents I meet tell me they expect their children to become trilingual. Poland is not alone in its economic success. All 10 former Eastern Bloc countries which joined the EU in 2004 have enjoyed strong economic growth. But Poland has specific advantages compared to those other nations. With a population of 38 million, it is comfortably the largest member of the group, and has used its size to become a regional hub. Since 2004, Poland has received €175bn (£152bn) from the EU – largely structural funding, which has improved infrastructure in the regions, as well as capital. Membership of the single market has perhaps been even more important. Foreign direct investment in Poland has risen seven-fold since 2003, the last year before EU membership, to 2023. Poland’s exports to the EU have grown five-fold since 2004. “Polish farmers became the largest beneficiaries of European integration,” says Dr Roch Dunin-Wąsowicz from University College London. Now the third-largest milk producer in the EU (after Germany and France), Polish agriculture now outperforms European rivals, including the UK, in some key areas. But Poland’s growth has not just been built on the country’s traditional strengths, like farming or manufacturing. Internet speeds are faster than those in the UK. Warsaw is regarded as a leader in financial technology, and also has a thriving gaming sector. “The previous growth was basically catching up,” explains Professor Joanna Tyrowicz, an economist at the research centre, Grape. “What we’re seeing increasingly is that the best Polish companies in many industries are performing as well as, or better, than those in any country in the EU. It’s a pretty new phenomenon.” ‘All the ingredients’ for success Should this trend continue, Tyrowicz says, Poland’s income levels could soon overtake those of many Western European countries. “If this really pans out, it is going to be massive. All the ingredients are here. We used to be catching up, and now we start having our own speed. Whether or not that succeeds is still an open question. Are all those innovative businesses enough to pull the whole economy?” Such optimism should not obscure the problems that Poland faces. The birth rate has plummeted to 1.1, among the lowest in Europe. Politics has a quasi-American dimension – a cocktail of knife-edge elections, with little to reconcile the two main parties, and an electorate sharply divided by gender and between urban and rural areas. Since joining the EU, Poland has received three times as much as it has contributed. One perverse sign of the country’s economic success is that it could soon go from being a net receiver of cash from the EU to a net contributor. “Yes, the growth has been impressive,” says Gavin Rae from Kozminski University. “But investment is now low, manufacturing output is in decline and public services – health and pensions – are in crisis.” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has brought unprecedented challenges. Over 2.5 million Ukrainians, the vast majority refugees who have arrived since 2022, now live in Poland, amounting to almost 7 per cent of Poland’s total population. As well as civilians and children, the number also includes tens of thousands of injured Ukrainian soldiers with mental health challenges. The Russian threat has also forced Poland, whose defence spending will rise to 4.8 per cent of GDP next year, to reduce spending elsewhere. The government has proposed £2.1bn worth of cuts to the health budget next year. Should Russia gain more Ukrainian land, and encroach even closer towards Polish territory, the pressure on other parts of the budget will intensify further. So will the country’s budget deficit, which has ballooned since the rise in military spending. 北約會員國軍費支出為GDP百分比統計圖 To walk around Warsaw is to meet the past at every turn. While the streets of London are studded with monuments to those slain in foreign fields, in Warsaw, those being honoured died in their homeland. Hundreds of thousands of people were killed on the ground of the capital in the Second World War, during the six years of Nazi occupation. A particularly poignant statue in Ogrod Saski, a major park, commemorates the Last Defenders of Warsaw. In this exact spot, men and teenage boys in the Polish Resistance were killed in 1944. In revenge for the uprising, the occupiers executed up to 200,000 Poles. From 1795 to 1989, Poland was only an independent nation for 21 years prior to the Second World War. About 5.7 million Poles died in that conflict, one-sixth of the population. The tragic irony of the fighting was that Poland was defeated twice – first by the Nazi-Soviet alliance, and then by the Soviets once more, who controlled the country after 1945. It was only in 1993 that the last Russian troops left Poland. All governments since, regardless of their other political beliefs, have been committed to ensuring that Russian soldiers never set foot in the country again. For the Polish government, Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 brought bitter vindication. “We tried to teach everyone about Russia without any success,” says Emilewicz. “There was no satisfaction after the outbreak of war – we were simply right.” While much of Europe agonises over relatively modest increases in military spending, Poland’s defence spending is now the highest of any Nato country. Poland now has the largest army of any country in mainland Europe, and the third largest in Nato, after America and Turkey. In Britain, military chiefs regularly bemoan a lack of popular willingness to face up to military threats. There is little need to convince Poles. Poland “totally should” spend so much on defence, says Maya Okoń, a 19-year-old studying at the University of Warsaw. “There are many, many monuments to war in every city in Poland. We’re very connected to our history. “Poland is one of the very few countries that actually appreciates its history, and we take our history very seriously. At school, we learn a lot about our history – not only Polish history, but also history around the world.” For Poles, a grave lesson passed to each new generation is to fear Russia. “We have no choice other than to be scared,” Okoń says. “Who wouldn’t be scared?” Military training is compulsory for every adult male, although there is no policy of conscription. This year, 230,000 men aged 18-23 were summoned to be entered into the military registry, undergoing medical and psychological examinations to determine their fitness to serve. There is an extreme fringe of Polish nationalism, including Neo Nazi and anti-Semitic groups. But several migrants from England note that Poland generally has a far easier relationship with patriotism, and greater comfort in the idea of national pride. “Patriotism is mainstream here and not tied to any political identity, whereas in the UK it can be tied to the far-Right,” Chelminska observes. “This is a big problem. Polish people are patriotic because we’ve lost our land and we fought to get it back. And we need to have that pride to protect it.” ‘Growing prosperity and international confidence’ Poland’s relative standing in Europe today is better than at any point since the end of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1795, Michał Przeperski, a popular historian and author, tells me. “From a historian’s perspective, Poland’s transformation is nothing short of a civilisational leap. In the late 1980s, the country was trapped in stagnation – grey, economically exhausted and burdened by a pervasive sense of hopelessness. “What we are seeing today, the return of emigrants, growing prosperity and international confidence, is the long-term dividend of an extraordinary, often chaotic, but ultimately successful transformation.” Poland has achieved what generations long dreamed of – to become a normal European country, defined by its integration with the centre and west of the continent. “Definitely,” says Emilewicz. Ambitious Poles long considered leaving the country essential to fulfilling their professional dreams. “When I was a student, all we were thinking about was how to move out of Poland, because of the 17 per cent unemployment rate and very low living standards,” recalls Emilewicz. Today’s students do not look West with the same envy. Poland’s economy is forecast to grow by 3.2 to 3.5 per cent this year, three times the Eurozone average. There is an essential optimism and self-confidence to Warsaw that was absent during my childhood visits to the city. Today, as they look out onto Park Praski, one of the green spaces that are dotted around Warsaw, a group of first-year students sees no reason to leave Poland.
“It’s the best place to live, I’m very proud to be Polish,” says Okoń. “It has its cons, as every country does, but mostly I love living here. When I was younger, I thought I’d study abroad, but university is free here.” All Polish nationals receive free university education at government-funded institutions. After studying, they are further incentivised to remain in Poland. Those aged 26 and under are exempt from paying income tax on the first 85,528zł (£17,750) they earn per year. Okoń once longed to live in Britain for a few years. Now, she is not sure what she would find that she could not already enjoy – and enjoy more cheaply – in Poland. “When I was younger, and the UK was still in the European Union, I dreamt of moving to England. Now, it’s more complicated. I guess it’s more expensive. It’s not the safest place either.” While visiting other major European cities, Okoń has no sense of Warsaw lagging behind. “When I think of other cities, nothing really comes to my mind that we lack. It’s all here.” Her friend, Hanna Wronska, agrees. “We complain a lot,” she says, as the long winter night closes in. “But honestly, everything is here. We have everything we need.” Try full access to The Telegraph free today. Unlock their award-winning website and essential news app, plus useful tools and expert guides for your money, health and holidays.
本文於 修改第 2 次
|
北約會員國如何反擊俄國而不引爆三戰 -- Roland Oliphant
|
|
|
推薦1 |
|
|
|
How Europe can strike back at Putin without starting World War Three As Russian drones and fighter jets test Nato’s resolve, the West gears up to defend itself Roland Oliphant, 09/30/25 Drones over Denmark, Poland and Romania. Jets over Estonia. Suspicious cyber attacks against Heathrow and other European airports. In the past three weeks, Russia has launched a series of dramatic and brazen tests of Nato’s will to defend itself. The alliance did not exactly pass with flying colours. The number of Russian drones the allies downed over Poland was a fraction of the hit rate achieved by the Ukrainian air force. But the incidents themselves are less significant than the timing. These missions were tests. They were designed to confirm the hypothesis that Nato – in particular, its most important member, the United States – lacks the will to respond forcefully to violations of its airspace. Why now? The big question is why test this hypothesis now? The answer is that Vladimir Putin and his allies judge that America is profoundly distracted. Donald Trump and those around him have already jettisoned the old Reaganite doctrine of American global dominance. Instead, the administration is split between “prioritisers” who believe America must focus its limited resources on containing China in the Pacific, and “restrainers” who are averse to American overseas entanglements anywhere at all. This process of realignment has been super-charged by the dramatic events since the murder of Charlie Kirk. Weeks of domestic turmoil culminated on Saturday with Donald Trump announcing he was sending troops into “war ravaged” Portland, Oregon, to tackle anti-ICE protestors. As Robert Pape, an expert on political violence at Chicago University, told The Telegraph’s Battle Lines podcast after Kirk’s killing, if Americans are focused on violence at home, they will necessarily be less engaged in facing down enemies elsewhere. And all this comes as a new Pentagon defence strategy, due to be published in the coming weeks but widely trailed in media leaks, refocuses the US military on defending the homeland and the Western hemisphere. Russia’s goal Russia’s strategic goal in Europe is no secret. It wishes to build what it calls a “new European security architecture” by essentially, rewriting the post-Cold War settlement to restore Moscow’s dominance on at least part of the Continent. That means destroying Ukraine as a sovereign state. But it also means dismantling Nato, and it may never get a better chance than the current Trump presidency. Sending fast jets into Estonian airspace and the successive drone intrusions over Poland, Romania and Denmark are Russian missions designed to determine how European nations will behave in practice when faced with war. If it comes to one Nato member shooting down a Russian fighter, say, will they stand shoulder to shoulder, or turn on each other? 2509 Estonian airspace violation 請至原網頁查看相關地圖 What can Nato’s European members do? First, European nations including Britain must accept that they have to act with minimal American help. Of course, the United States can never be wholly written off. Recently, Trump and JD Vance, his deputy, have dramatically shifted their rhetoric about the war in Ukraine. But rhetoric is one thing. What is clear is the world’s superpower is preoccupied, and will continue to be for some time. Secondly, we must accept that our influence over the future of the Continent is directly proportional to our willingness to use force – and take risks – to defend it. One option proposed by a group of senior Western politicians and soldiers is to put an air defence shield up over western Ukraine to shoot down Russian missiles and drones, with the option ultimately to extend that shield – an effective no-fly zone – over Kyiv itself. Ukraine Integrated Air Protection Zone請至原網頁查看相關地圖 After all, RAF fighters have intercepted Iranian drones and missiles headed for Israel. Since Russia’s air campaign is waged by drones and long-range missiles fired from well inside Russian airspace, such an operation would not risk killing Russian servicemen. However, it would demonstrate that Europe is determined enough to hit back at air incursions, and to shoulder a degree of risk to do so. It would also make a material difference to Ukraine’s war effort. Most importantly, it would signal to Putin that if Russia makes dilemmas for the West, Europe can – and will – do the same for Russia. European leaders gathering in Copenhagen this week will undoubtedly discuss this, along with other ideas. But the important thing is that whatever posture they adopt, it sends a clear signal to Moscow. As Volodymyr Zelensky warned on Saturday: “Putin will not wait for the war in Ukraine to end. He will open some other fronts. No one knows which one. But there is no doubt that he wants it.” Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
本文於 修改第 2 次
|
普丁測試NATO會員國決心 -- Frida Ghitis
|
|
|
推薦1 |
|
|
|
The Night Putin Tested NATO For the first time ever, NATO struck enemy targets on its territory. Frida Ghitis, 09/11/25 If you’re interested in world affairs and want to support my work, please subscribe and share NATO’S MOST SERIOUS TEST HAS ARRIVED People living in eastern Poland were jolted awake early this morning, their windows rattling as explosions ripped the air. Russian military drones had infiltrated NATO airspace and Alliance fighter jets had rushed to counter them, shooting down several Russian drones apparently fired from Russian-allied Belarus. It was the first time in NATO’s history that its forces fought enemy targets in the sovereign airspace of a member country. And, although repelled, it remains a major test for the alliance’s fundamental vow to protect all of its territory from the enemy. Since the day Russian President Vladimir Putin launched its all-out invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO allies, including the U.S., have repeatedly vowed that they will defend every inch of NATO territory. The initial response was effective. Overnight, between Tuesday and Wednesday, Poland scrambled F-16 fighter jets, joined by Dutch F-35s, Italian AWACS aircraft, and German Patriot defense systems. Poland closed several airports, including its biggest one in Warsaw. It wasn’t the first time that a Russian missile had crossed the border, but this event was different. In every other case the incident could credibly be viewed as an accident. It’s early to know what exactly led to the confrontation. But this time, it looks calculated. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said, “We are dealing with a large-scale provocation,” warning, “The situation is serious, and no one doubts that we must prepare for various scenarios.” Early estimates show 19 Russian drones crossed into Poland. Speaking to the Polish parliament, Tusk said the first air space violation was detected at 11:30 p.m. on Tuesday, with the last one at 6:30 a.m. “That gives you an idea of the scale, it lasted all night.” Rather that invoking NATO’s famed Article 5, which asserts that an attack on one NATO member is an attack on all, Poland activated Article 4, which reads: “The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.” Putin may be testing the Alliance, probing to see how determined NATO is to fight back against Russia if he decides to reconquer other former Soviet-ruled lands beyond Ukraine, especially NATO members Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. That is something Putin has strongly hinted he would like to do. Under the previous U.S. administration, Washington repeatedly asserted its determination. Then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, speaking in Kyiv with a message to Moscow, declared, “The United States will defend every inch of NATO territory.” The Trump administration has been much more ambiguous. In fact, last Friday, Trump’s DOD reportedly informed European allies that U.S. military support for NATO’s eastern flank – including Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania -- would be sharply reduced. Four days later, and a week after Trump welcomed the Polish president to the White House, Russian drones started flying over Poland. Russia: Who, Me? Russia quickly dismissed the accusations that it had intentionally – or otherwise – launched military drones toward Poland. The top Russian diplomat in Warsaw called the accusations “groundless.” The Defense Ministry in Moscow said -- falsely according to experts -- that Russian drones are incapable of reaching Poland. Belarus contradicted Kremlin denials, suggesting it was all an accident, with the drones veering off course. At least one high-level Kremlin insider seeded conspiracy theories, claiming it was Ukraine that attacked Poland, aiming to force NATO to join the fight. But Europeans are having none of it, and are treating the incident as a major wake up call. The European Union’s foreign affairs chief, Kaja Kallas, described it as, “the most serious European airspace violation by Russia since the war began.” The former Estonian prime minister, who has long warned about the threat from Moscow, said “indications suggest it was intentional, not accidental.” That seemed to be the emerging consensus as the investigation got underway. Radoslaw Fogiel, deputy chairman of the Polish Parliament’s foreign affairs committee said, “there is a strong indication at this moment that these were not random incidents but planned actions.” Polish Gen. Tomasz Piotrowski said, “I assess this incursion as a deliberate test of Poland’s resilience, the cohesion of our leadership, and the awareness of our society.” Poland has been deeply polarized, with a prime minister and president from rival parties. Piotrowski said the incursion, “appears to be well prepared by Russia in cooperation with Belarus.” The question is what comes next. Whether it was an accident or a deliberate action, Putin is surely watching with great interest. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte praised the response in which multiple NATO members quickly jumped into action, but he called on Russia to stop the war. Even an accident, he said, “is absolutely reckless. It is absolutely dangerous.” 請至原網頁查看烏克蘭外長評論 Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha wrote on social media that the surge of Russian drones over Polish skies is proof that “Putin’s sense of impunity keeps growing because he was not properly punished for his previous crimes.” He has a point. Ever since Putin’s summit in Alaska, in which President Donald Trump broke his international isolation, Russia has sharply escalated its offensive in Ukraine. On Sunday, it launched the largest attack yet, with more than 800 drones and missiles. The strikes hit the main government building in Kyiv and set it on fire. On Tuesday, Russia struck and killed 25 elderly Ukrainians who were standing in line to receive their pensions in an eastern village. Ukraine’s Sybiha warned that, “A weak response now will provoke Russia even more – and then Russian missiles and drones will fly even further into Europe.” The ball is now in NATO’s court. If you would like INSIGHT by Frida Ghitis to continue offering timely analysis of world events, please consider subscribing or upgrading to a paid subscription. 請至原網頁訂閱
本文於 修改第 1 次
|
|
|