|
中國軍事力量:中國第四艘航母使用核能為動力-A. Mendelson
|
2025/03/04 13:45 瀏覽246 |回應3 |推薦1 |
|
|
這篇報導為本欄開欄文。
中國第四艘航母使用核能為動力 -- Allegra Mendelson China building supercarrier to rival US China building supercarrier to rival US Nuclear-powered warship will match capability of USS Gerald R Ford Allegra Mendelson, 03/03/25 China is developing a new nuclear-powered aircraft carrier which would be larger and more advanced than any existing vessel in its fleet, in an attempt to keep pace with the US navy. The new supercarrier would allow fighter jets to be launched from four parts of the flight deck, as opposed to its current ships which can only facilitate three, according to new satellite imagery reviewed by NBC News. That would match the capability of USS Gerald R. Ford, the largest and most advanced aircraft carrier in the US navy. Images from the Dalian shipbuilding facility in north-east China show tracks or trenches in the snow, which appear to be related to a new catapult launch system.
The tracks in the snow at the Dalian facility, which may be linked to a new catapult launch system - Maxar Technologies 請至原網頁觀看照片 Analysts said that while the images don’t show construction under way just yet, they are an indication that China is moving forward with its ambitious plans. “We think this is them testing equipment and layouts for the upcoming Type 04 carrier,” Michael Duitsman, a researcher at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies in the US, told NBC. China’s first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, was commissioned in 2012 and its second, the Shandong, was launched in 2017. Both use the “ski-jump” method, which involves a ramp at the end of a short runway to propel the planes upward. The Dalian shipbuilding facility where a new nuclear-powered carrier could be developed - Maxar Technologies請至原網頁觀看照片 The country’s third and most advanced carrier to date, the Fujian, launched in 2022 and was upgraded with electromagnetic catapults, which are more similar to the systems used onboard US ships. All three of China’s carriers are conventionally powered, unlike the upcoming one, which experts believe would be powered by a nuclear reactor given its size and capacity. The tracks seen in the latest satellite images run at convergent angles, which experts say resemble the configuration of existing American supercarriers that have four electromagnetic catapults. Mr Duitsman said that it seems likely that China’s new carrier would resemble the USS Gerald R. Ford. The USS Gerald R. Ford is the largest and most advanced aircraft carrier in the US navy - US NAVY/ERIK HILDEBRANDT HANDOUT
China already has the largest navy in the world, with 370 military vessels, but America, with 291 vessels, has more big ships. The Gerald Ford is one of 11 supercarriers in the US navy. Rumours have circulated for years that China is preparing to build a Type 04 carrier. However, Beijing has refused to confirm any reports and very little information has been made public. The USS Gerald R Ford can launch jets from four places on the carrier’s deck, while China’s Fujian, third and most advanced carrier to date, can only launch from three請至原網頁觀看照片 Last November, analysts at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies in the US revealed that China had built a land-based prototype nuclear reactor for a large surface warship. Until the satellite images from Dalian, this was the first and only piece of evidence that Beijing was developing a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. China has not commented on the latest reports about its plans for a supercarrier. However, last March, Yuan Huazhi, the political commissar of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army navy, told the state-backed Global Times that there was no bottleneck in China’s aircraft carrier technologies and development was progressing smoothly. At the time, Yuan also said that more information would be made available “soon”, but little has been heard from Beijing since. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
本文於 2025/03/10 09:05 修改第 3 次
|
中國PL-15空對空飛彈初試牛刀? -- Thomas Newdick
|
|
2025/05/08 13:40 推薦1 |
|
|
相關報導請見此欄(2025/05/08)和此處。請至原網頁觀看照片與消息來源。
China’s PL-15 Air-To-Air Missile Appears To Have Been Used In Combat For The First Time Thomas Newdick, 05/08/25 The air war currently unfolding between India and Pakistan is exceedingly murky, but one aspect that seems almost certain is the use of the Chinese-made PL-15 active-radar-guided air-to-air missile (AAM) by Pakistan. So far, Pakistan claims to have shot down five Indian aircraft and at least one Indian official has reportedly confirmed the crash of three aircraft but cautioned that the reasons were not clear. Unverified imagery suggests that one of the Indian Air Force’s prized Rafale multirole fighters may have been shot down. Regardless, the fighting between the two nuclear-armed states is the most intense for decades, now with the growing risk of the situation spiraling further out of control. The air war currently unfolding between India and Pakistan is exceedingly murky, but one aspect that seems almost certain is the use of the Chinese-made PL-15 active-radar-guided air-to-air missile (AAM) by Pakistan. So far, Pakistan claims to have shot down five Indian aircraft, and there are multiple accounts, including from Indian officials, pointing to the crash of at least two aircraft, without specifying the reasons. Meanwhile, a French official has reportedly confirmed the loss of one of the Indian Air Force’s prized Rafale multirole fighters. Regardless, the fighting between the two nuclear-armed states is the most intense for decades, now with the growing risk of the situation spiraling further. Imagery showing the apparent wreckage of a PL-15 missile began circulating on social media today. Reportedly, the missile parts fell in Hoshiarpur district, in the northeast of the Indian state of Punjab. In particular, a portion of the missile body, from immediately behind the radome, can be identified. This carries a serial number and a small door marked as a seeker test port, as seen at the top of this story. Another image purports to show the missile seeker from the PL-15, which uses active electronically scanned array (AESA) technology, with active and passive modes, and which is said to provide better resistance to countermeasures than previous Chinese AAMs. While the identity of the weapon can’t be verified beyond doubt at this point, a PL-15 seems most likely. Whether the missile in question successfully brought down a target is unclear. Whatever the case, Pakistan’s use of the missile is a significant development; this seems to be the first confirmed use of the weapon in an operational context. As you can read about in our in-depth story on Chinese air-to-air missiles, the PL-15 is China’s standard active-radar-guided AAM, and it was intended to at least match the performance of the U.S.-made AIM-120D Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM). From the start, this missile was tailored for internal carriage, initially in the J-20 stealth fighter, and features distinctive cropped fins to reduce its dimensions. A further version, even better optimized for internal carriage, has since appeared, as you can read about here. The basic PL-15 has a dual-pulse rocket motor that provides a reported range of 124 miles. Another important feature is a two-way datalink that allows the launching aircraft to provide guidance updates to the missile and the missile to provide its own information to the launching aircraft. The potent PL-15 missile prompted the United States, among others, to start the development of new air-to-air weapons specifically designed to outrange them. In the meantime, the PL-15 is now replacing the older PL-12 across China’s fighter fleet and is also offered for export under the PL-15E name. Published performance figures for the PL-15E include a range of 90 miles, somewhat less than for the domestic version, which could be the result of a different propellant or changes to the motor. In Pakistan Air Force service, the PL-15E arms the JF-17 Block III fighter as well as the J-10C, for which Pakistan became the first export customer, with initial deliveries in 2022. India has a counterpart to the PL-15 in the MBDA Meteor beyond-viual-range missile (BVRAAM), a ramjet-powered weapon that may well offer advantages over the Chinese missile. While Western analysts determine that the PL-15 has a comparable maximum range to the Meteor, the pan-European missile likely has a much larger no-escape zone and better long-range kill probability thanks to its ramjet motor. Regardless of what the PL-15 was fired at, and whether it successfully engaged its target, Pakistan has posted a flurry of claims of Indian Air Force aircraft shot down. A report in The New York Times cites three officials, local news reports, and accounts of witnesses, who said that “at least two aircraft” went down in India and the Indian-controlled side of Kashmir. Various unverified imagery has been posted to social media purporting to show the wreckage of Indian Air Force fighters shot down or otherwise lost in combat. With so much propaganda circulating and information operations ongoing, all open-source imagery has to be taken as unconfirmed. One of these shows an engine that appears to be from a French-made combat jet, initially identified as either an Indian Air Force Rafale or Mirage 2000, although certain details of the nozzle seemed to point more strongly toward the first option. Subsequently, a photo began to circulate that purports to show parts of a Rafale’s tailfin and rudder lying in a field, said to be in Bathinda, Punjab. The wreckage bears the serial number BS-001, which would identify it as a single-seat Rafale EH. A video apparently taken by locals in the village of Aklian Kalan, Punjab, shows what seems to be the remains of an MBDA MICA air-to-air missile, as well as its associated missile launch rail. The MICA is a weapon associated with both the Rafale and the Mirage 2000, although Aklian Kalan is notably only around 12 miles from Bathinda Air Force Station, home to Indian Rafales. Since this imagery began to circulate, an unnamed French official confirmed to CNN that an Indian Air Force Rafale was brought down by Pakistan, but provided no details of exactly what brought it down. Other imagery claims to show the wreckage of an Indian MiG-29 Fulcrum or Su-30MKI Flanker fighter, based on the Russian-made K-36DM ejection seat that’s visible. This aircraft is said to have come down in the Ramban district of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Previously, Reuters had reported that an Indian combat jet “crashed” for unspecified reasons somewhere in Jammu and Kashmir, and that its pilot was injured and taken to a hospital. A single pilot, if true, would point toward a MiG-29 rather than the two-seat Su-30. All of these developments, as well as the surrounding claims and counter-claims, point to the confusion that is very typical when dealing with the heat of combat. With that in mind, it remains possible that at least some of these apparent losses were accidents, or perhaps blue-on-blue incidents. The involvement of surface-to-air missiles also shouldn’t be ruled out at this stage. And while the loss of a Rafale, especially to a Chinese-designed fighter, if confirmed, would be a huge propaganda win for Pakistan and, to some degree, China, the reality is that modern air combat is far more than a simple fighter-versus-fighter affair. In the long run, other aspects, including training, munitions, networking, airborne early warning, electronic warfare, tactics, and much more, will play into successes and failures. With that in mind, even the combat loss of a Rafale doesn’t make that aircraft a dud, which is good news for the Indian Navy, too, this service having recently had an order for the carrier-based version of the fighter signed off. In other developments, the office of Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said that the country’s armed forces have been authorized to undertake “corresponding actions” after India’s strikes on Wednesday night. For its part, India said that its Operation Sindoor hit nine targets that it described as “terrorist infrastructure” in Pakistan and on Pakistan’s side of the disputed Kashmir region. Indian military spokespersons said that the targets belonged to two Islamist militant groups: Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri told a briefing that “Intelligence and monitoring of Pakistan-based terror modules showed that further attacks against India were impending, therefore it was necessary to take pre-emptive and precautionary strikes.” Pakistan said that six locations on its territory were targeted, but claimed that none of them were militant camps. A Pakistan military spokesperson said that at least 26 civilians were killed and 46 injured in the strikes. In a statement, JeM said that 10 relatives of its leader Masood Azhar were killed in an Indian strike. Indian police and medics claim that at least seven civilians have been killed and 30 others injured by retaliatory Pakistani firing and shelling overnight. Based on imagery that has emerged on social media, India appears to have used a version of its BrahMos supersonic cruise missile in at least some of these strikes, alongside attacks by Indian Air Force fighters. Also known by the designation PJ-10, this ramjet-powered weapon was developed and manufactured as a collaborative effort between India and Russia. The BrahMos is available in ground-launched, air-launched, sub-launched, and ship-launched versions, and the missile has a reported range of between 300-500 kilometers (186-311 miles). The Indian government has said its latest strikes were retaliation for the terrorist attack that killed 26 civilians in Kashmir last month. This is a developing story. We will update it as more news comes in. Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com
|
中國攻擊快艇對美國龐然戰艦 - Kapil Kajal
|
|
2025/04/30 18:23 推薦1 |
|
|
China deploys 200-ton boats to take on 10,000-ton US warships in South China Sea As China expands its maritime power, the platform’s design advantages allow it to be used in various roles. Kapil Kajal, 04/28/25 China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy has deployed Type 22 fast attack missile boats to target US Navy warships in the South China Sea. 請至原網頁觀看攻擊快艇照片 This action occurred as the United States continues to enhance its naval presence near China. A recent report by China Central Television (CCTV) showcased the PLA Navy utilizing the boat in missions involving the interception of foreign warships and the protection of maritime rights in the contested South China Sea. 200-ton fast attack boat Initially fielded when the PLA Navy lacked significant blue-water capabilities, the Type 22 was designed to counter littoral threats. Fast and agile, this platform uses stealth technology to fill an important operational need. As China expands its maritime power, the platform’s design advantages allow it to be used in various roles. According to CCTV, the Type 22 has been routinely assigned to littoral patrols, escort duties, monitoring operations, and joint missions with China Coast Guard units. In a recent training operation, a Type 22 boat commanded by Yang Wu from the PLA Eastern Theater Command intercepted a foreign naval warship that had allegedly entered Chinese territorial waters. A warship entered the area, weighing between 8,000 and 9,000 tons. This is much larger than the 220-ton Type 22. Even with this size difference, the Type 22 used quick movements, low radar visibility, and strong firepower to reach the area quickly, strengthen its position, and confront the larger ship. The tactical utility of speed, stealth, and precision strike capabilities over sheer size was again demonstrated. 8 cruise missiles Chinese military analyst Wang Yunfei, speaking to the Global Times, highlighted that the Type 22 was engineered for an era when coastal defense was paramount and the PLA Navy’s fleet of major surface combatants was minimal. The Type 22 has a top speed of about 50 knots and can launch anti-ship missiles, making it a powerful tool during its early use. As the PLA Navy shifts to a mix of defending coastal areas and operating far out at sea, the Type 22 is still important. The Type 22 boat has a shallow draft and can move quickly. This is helpful in the tricky waters of the South China Sea, where larger ships might get stuck on reefs or in shallow areas. Moreover, the Type 22 can sail faster than most enemy ships of similar size, which gives it an edge in coastal battles. The platform’s ongoing importance was reinforced during the PLA Navy’s 76th anniversary celebrations on April 23, when over 30 vessels, including the Type 22, were made accessible to the public. Xinhua News Agency reported that the vessel features new technology. It is the Navy's first stealth catamaran missile boat and the main combat vessel that uses waterjet propulsion. These features improve the vessel's speed, agility, and survival ability. The Type 22 is mainly made of aluminum alloy to keep it light. It has a six-barreled 30 mm gun system, jamming flares, and two launchers that can fire eight YJ-83 anti-ship missiles. Despite its significantly smaller displacement, this gives the Type 22 firepower comparable to a frigate (巡防艦). The Type 22 missile boat is built for speed, stealth, and strong weaponry to help in combat. It is still used today, showing that China prioritizes adaptable ships that can handle different tasks in tough sea conditions.
本文於 2025/04/30 18:25 修改第 2 次
|
中、美爭霸誰能掌控制空權? - Chris Panella
|
|
2025/04/22 10:59 推薦1 |
|
|
可視為爭取海軍軍費的「說貼」。 China could stop US airpower from achieving air superiority in the first island chain, top commander says Chris Panella, 04/19/25 * China's air force is capable of denying US superiority in the first island chain, the top US commander in the Pacific said. * Adm. Samuel Paparo said that China's fighter fleet, bombers, and missiles are enough to cause problems. * He said that neither side would see air supremacy in a potential war. China can prevent the US from achieving air superiority within the key first island chain, America's top commander in the Indo-Pacific region said. Last week, Adm. Samuel Paparo, the head of US Indo-Pacific Command, gave China "high marks" in its ability to prevent the US from achieving air superiority in the first island chain, the strategic archipelagos in East Asia that includes Japan, Taiwan, and the northern Philippines, among other territories. In a hearing with the US Senate Armed Services Committee, Paparo pointed to China's air force. He said that China now has 2,100 fighters and 200 H-6 bombers and a production rate for fighters that's currently 1.2 to 1 over the US. China still operates a lot of older airframes, but the number of capable fourth-generation platforms is on the rise, as is its number of fifth-gen fighters. And the country continues to work on new aircraft designs. "Furthermore," Paparo explained during the hearing, "their advanced long-range air-to-air missiles also present a tremendous threat." China has prioritized building up its missile stockpiles and capabilities in recent years, particularly ones capable of targeting US and allied forces and installations, including insufficiently defended airfields, in the region. Air superiority, like the US military has enjoyed in conflicts in the Middle East in recent decades, requires securing a substantial degree of control over the skies with little interference from the enemy, meaning aircraft can operate with flexibility and provide support for other forces. Ceding that air superiority, Paparo said, "is not an option if we intend to maintain capability against our adversaries and the ability to support our allies," especially in the first island chain. But both the US and Chinese air forces have been rethinking what air superiority would look like in a conflict and questioning whether that is even possible for more than brief windows of time. With both sides employing advanced sensors and long-range weapons, including formidable air defenses, permanently controlling the skies seems increasingly unlikely. That said, the admiral explained that he has "some game," too. In a conflict, neither Beijing nor Washington's forces would likely achieve air supremacy, or complete control, Paparo said. "It will be my job to contest air superiority, to protect those forces that are on the first island chain, such as 3rd Marine Expeditionary Force," the commander explained to lawmakers, "and also to provide windows of air superiority in order to achieve our effects." Officials and experts have often discussed what the future US Air Force strategy against China should look like, the role of unmanned aerial systems in that, and how air power could determine the outcome of a war. Also important is considering how China's air defense systems would protect important targets, such as critical command and control centers, air bases, and radar sites. Researchers have said that China could more easily devastate American airpower than the other way around. Some have pointed to the importance of hardening US airbases and bolstering air defenses in the Indo-Pacific to improve the survivability of American aircraft should China launch a missile strike. Lawmakers in Washington have said the US isn't doing enough in that regard.
本文於 2025/04/22 11:02 修改第 3 次
|
|
|