網路城邦
回本城市首頁 時事論壇
市長:胡卜凱  副市長:
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【時事論壇】城市/討論區/
討論區知識和議題 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
《智力和性格間的確具有相關性》要點譯述
 瀏覽883|回應1推薦1

胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (1)

胡卜凱

0.  研究範圍

本研究歷時14年;綜合50個國家所進行1,300個研究;參與人數達200研究者將「個人性格」細分為79種;細分為97

1. 
什麼是「個人性格」和「認知能力」

「個人性格」和「認知能力」主要是每個人由基因決定的穩定性質。它們會決定一個人一生的際遇諸如學習能力、工作表現、離婚機率、和壽命長度等等。本報告中其簡單定義如下:

1) 
「個人性格」

「個人性格」描述我們每一個人通常思考、感覺、行動等等的模式;心理學家一般將它概括為互不相涉的「五大面向情緒不穩定程度外向程度義務--負責程度開放程度親和程度。如上所述,在本研究中,研究者在每一個「面向」下又做了更細緻的分類

2) 
「認知能力」

「智力」(術語稱為「認知能力」)指一個人了解和運用資訊的能力即程度。通常科學家把它分成兩類:「既得知識」或稱「學習能力」,指取得特定知識或技藝的能力;「非既得知識」則指所有其它方面的認知能力。在本研究中,它也被研究者做了更細緻的分類

2. 
那些性格和智力相關?

1) 
範例

該文作者依以下順序舉例說明「個人性格」各面向的意涵以及它們和智力的相關性

a.  開放程度
b.  義務--負責程度
c.  外向程度
d.  情緒不穩定程度
e.  親和程度

2) 
結論

作者闡述在該「個人性格」和「認知能力」相關性研究中,學者群所得到的兩個重點:

a. 
/他們發現兩者間的重大「相關性」都在細致部分的層級;而不是在「五大面向」本身的層級。
b. 
過去一些關於「性格」和「智力」相關性的刻板印象是錯誤的。例如,快樂、參與、和樂於助人的人,智力通常高於情緒不穩和對他人漠不關心的人

3. 
應用

1) 
作者強調此研究發現的只是兩者統計上的「相關性」,而非兩者間的「因果關係」。
2) 
某些「性格特徵」會增加一個人追求認知活動的傾向。
3) 
高認知程度能幫助一個人易於處理生活上碰到的問題而減低負面情緒發生機率。

後記:

對「性格」和「認知」兩個領域有興趣的人,這篇報告值得一讀。如作者所說,此研究結果是後續研究的起步點;其成果應該非常可觀

英、中名詞對照:

nuances --
細微差別
stereotypes --
刻板印象


本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=7211376
 回應文章
智力和性格間的確具有相關性 -- Elizabeth Gilbert
推薦1


胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

胡卜凱

An enormous study links intelligence and personality in surprising ways

Are fools happy and geniuses disorganized — or is that a mistaken stereotype?

Elizabeth Gilbert, 08/15/23

KEY TAKEAWAYS

*  Despite stereotypes about which personality traits are linked to intelligence, surprisingly little is known about how personality and cognitive abilities relate.  
*  An enormous new publicly available dataset containing over 1,300 studies of millions of people from across the world establishes hundreds of reliable relationships between dozens of personality traits and cognitive abilities. 
*  This detailed assessment of personality and intelligence helps elucidate what makes someone a unique individual and provides clues for how to optimize one’s life choices

Thousands of studies examine human personality and intelligence — core aspects of individuality — including 
how to measure them and how they impact life outcomes. But we know surprisingly little about how personality and intelligence relate to each another.

“Each study pressed a pinprick in the veil, offering an insight into what makes people unique,” Kevin Stanek, a human capital researcher at Gilead Sciences, explained to Big Think. “But we wanted the panoramic view. We wanted to know how it all fits together to make each person an individual.”

So Stanek, Deniz Ones, and dozens of research assistants set out on a massive quest to collect data from every study they could find, including research that was never published, research by the military and private businesses, and research that had sat dormant on hard drives for decades. “We couldn’t have done it without thousands of hours of help from other researchers and volunteers,” reflects Stanek.

Fourteen years later, the 
massive data catalog has dropped. It contains 79 personality traits and 97 cognitive abilities from 1,300 studies from over 50 countries including over 2 million participants. And an early meta-analysis published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences shows that personality and intelligence relate in some surprising ways.

What do we mean by personality and intelligence?

Personality and intelligence are 
largely genetic, stable traits that substantially influence the course of one’s life, from educational attainment and job performance to divorce rate and life expectancy. But what are they, exactly?

Personality describes how someone generally thinks, feels, and behaves. It is made up of five major independent traits, also known as the “
Big 5”: neuroticism, extraversion, conscientiousness, openness, and agreeableness. Stanek and Ones’ dataset also incorporates several aspects and facets that make up each of the Big 5 traits, like depression and suspiciousness for neuroticism, and politeness and empathy for agreeableness.

Intelligence (termed cognitive ability by the researchers) describes how well someone can understand and apply information. Intelligence can be split into two kinds. Acquired knowledge, also called invested abilities, refers to specific skills and knowledge. Non-invested knowledge refers to all other cognitive abilities. Like personality, these two types of intelligence can be broken into facets like working memory, pattern recognition, and verbal ability.

“The links between these nuanced traits are what make us individuals,” explains Stanek. “They’re the richness of the picture beyond just personality types and IQ scores.”

How personality is related to intelligence

The disorganized and absentminded professor, the moody genius, the bubbly airhead — many stereotypes link certain personality traits to intelligence. Is any of this based in reality? Stanek and Ones’ initial meta-analysis of the compilation found hundreds of reliable relationships between personality and intelligence. (An interactive 
visualization is available here on Stanek’s website.) Here’s a sampling:

Openness, which refers to the willingness to engage with new ideas and experiences, is the only personality trait with an established history linking it to intelligence. As expected, openness was moderately strongly correlated with general mental ability.

Conscientiousness, a measure of self-regulation and orderliness, correlated positively with intelligence overall. But some facets, including cautiousness and routine seeking, predicted lower cognitive abilities.

Extraversion, a measure of sociality and enthusiasm, was only negligibly related to intelligence overall. However, the activity facet more strongly correlated, and (surprisingly) sociability had a small negative relationship with some cognitive abilities.

Neuroticism encompasses negative emotionality, which can inhibit advanced thinking. Despite the trope of the moody genius, perhaps it’s no surprise that higher levels of neuroticism predicted lower levels of intelligence, albeit weakly. The uneven temper and depression facets were particularly strong predictors of decreased intelligence.

Agreeableness, which relates to getting along with others, overall had the weakest correlation with intelligence. However, the compassion and interpersonal sensitivity facets were moderately strong predictors of general mental ability, and the politeness facet was negatively associated with some cognitive abilities.

In short, the data showed at least two things. First, most of the significant correlations occur at the facet level rather than the Big 5 level. Ignoring these more specific traits conceals important relationships between personality and cognitive ability. “It’s convenient to categorize people into basic types,” Ones says. ”But only by incorporating the many nuances of personality do we see the constellation of traits that matter and make someone unique.”

Second, many of our stereotypes are wrong. Happy, engaged, compassionate people are more likely to be intelligent than their moody, insensitive counterparts.

What to expect when you’re extraverted

Ones cautions against any causal claims. These are after all just correlations, and it will take time for researchers to fully assess how clusters of personality 
traits and abilities move together. But one intriguing possibility is that certain personalities are more likely to engage in cognitively enriching activities. This would explain why openness (that is, interest in engaging with new ideas and experiences) and activeness (a facet of extraversion) were positively related to intelligence.

It’s also possible that intelligence makes life easier, thus reducing negative emotionality and freeing one up to be less cautious and more compassionate. Or some third factor could be at play, like wealth or health boosting cognitive abilities and facilitating certain personality types. (Stanek and Ones are releasing a book this fall that will detail their thoughts on how it all fits together.)

“One takeaway is simply these neat connections — empathetic people, happy people, open people tend to be more intelligent,” says Ones. “But it’s bigger than that.” Stanek and Ones set their sights on using this information to better understand why personality and cognitive abilities go together, and ultimately how this information can optimize people’s success. 

“Right now, companies use information to understand and influence you,” Ones explains. “We want people to better understand themselves so they can identify their optimal job, friends, city, romantic partner, or anything else important to them.”


本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=7211377