網路城邦
回本城市首頁 時事論壇
市長:胡卜凱  副市長:
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【時事論壇】城市/討論區/
討論區知識和議題 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
自然科學10大懸案--LifeScience Staff
 瀏覽939|回應6推薦2

胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (2)

麥芽糖
胡卜凱

Top 10 Greatest Mysteries in Science

LifeScience Staff

This project began two years ago when we asked several several scientists from various fields what they thought were the greatest mysteries. From their input, we wrote about 14 big enigmas. None have been solved since. So last month, we asked you to rank the list . What follows, backed by more than 8,000 of your votes as of May 7, 2009, are 10 of the greatest mysteries facing science today. No. 1 was, as we had figured it might be, a clear winner with 20 percent of the vote (No. 2 got 16 percent)

10.   What Drives Evolution?

What Drives Evolution? You've heard it before: Natural selection is accepted by scientists as the main engine driving the array of organisms and their complex features. It is one of the most well tested theories in science.

But is evolution via natural selection the only explanation for complex organisms?

"I think one of the greatest mysteries in biology at the moment is whether natural selection is the only process capable of generating organismal complexity," said Massimo Pigliucci of the Department of Ecology and Evolution at Stony Brook University in New York, "or whether there are other properties of matter that also come into play. I suspect the latter will turn out to be true." [Full Story: Read More]

9.     What Happens Inside an Earthquake?

We were surprised this one made the initial list, then surprised again when it got voted into the Top 10 by you. But it is odd that we don't know what's going on right here on our home planet, right under our feet.

Experts can explain exactly where a quake started and what type of fault is involved and maybe even predict how long aftershocks will last. But they are quite unsure of what happens inside the planet during a quake. The nature and behavior of the forces that keep faults from moving and then suddenly fail are still unknown.

"The problem of frictional sliding in earthquakes is one of the most fundamental problems in all of Earth science," said Caltech geophysicist Tom Heaton. "It has been a 30-year mystery story of figuring out the basic physics of the earthquake problem." [Read More]

8.     Who Are You?

The nature of consciousness has long baffled psychologists and cognitive scientists. Part of the answer, however, is surprisingly simple: Most of what drives what we do is embedded in neural networks not readily accessible by conscious thought, said Joseph LeDoux, a neuroscientist at New York University.

"The intuitive everyday idea about the sense of self and its control over behavior is as incorrect as the idea that the earth is flat," Morsella agreed. Although we think of ourselves as independent agents, we're not. Everything we do is influenced by unconscious processes and our environment, he added.

The leap to figuring out how we make conscious decisions, and what gives us each a mind of our own and a soul, well ... only No. 8?[Read More]

7.     How Did Life Arise on Earth?

We expected this to be voted higher. But some votes for No. 2 on the list might have been split from this one.

Early evidence for simple, microbial life on Earth dates back more than 3 billion years. How it arose, nobody knows. Ideas range from chemical reactions around seafloor heat vents to reactions in rock.

"Many theories of the origin of life have been proposed, but since it's hard to prove or disprove them, no fully accepted theory exists," said Diana Northup, a cave biologist at the University of New Mexico. [Read More]

Weighing in at an average of 2.7 pounds (1,200 grams), the human brain packs a whopping 100 billion neurons. Every minute, about three soda-cans worth of blood flow through the brain. Credit: dreamstime.

6.     How Does the Brain Work?

Some readers argued that we have a good handle on this. Well, sure, a lot more is known than was the case just a few decades ago. But with billions of neurons, each with thousands of connections, this is a tough nut to crack.

"We all think we understand the brain--at least our own--through our experiences. But our own subjective experience is a very poor guide to how the brain works," said Scott Huettel of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at Duke University.

Among the enigmas: "We do not yet have a good way to study how groups of neurons form functional networks when we learn, remember, or do anything else, including seeing, hearing moving, loving," said said Norman Weinberger, a neuroscientist at the University of California, Irvine. "If we understand the brain, we will understand both its capacities and its limits for thought, emotions, reasoning, love and every other aspect of human life." [Read More]

5.     Where is the Rest of the Universe?

It stinks when try to study something and most of it isn't there. So it is with the universe.

"I call it the dark side of the universe," said Michael Turner, a cosmologist at the University of Chicago, referring to the great mysteries of dark matter and dark energy.

In fact, only 4 percent of the matter and energy in the universe has been found. The other 96 percent remains elusive, but scientists are looking in the farthest reaches of space and deepest depths of Earth to solve the two dark riddles. [Read More]

4.     What Causes Gravity?

You'd think this down-to-earth concept would be well understood. Heck, Newton figured it out long ago, right?

Nope. Gravity is the weakest of all known forces in the universe, and the standard mode of physics does not explain how it works. Theorists think it might involve tiny, massless particles called gravitons that emanate gravitational fields.

"Gravity is completely different from the other forces described by the standard model," said Mark Jackson, a theoretical physicist at Fermilab in Illinois. "When you do some calculations about small gravitational interactions, you get stupid answers. The math simply doesn't work." [Read More]

3.     Is There a Theory of Everything?

Only a smart bunch of readers would vote this up so high. This stuff is really, really complex. Here goes the short version:

Physicists have a good "standard model" that carves the known universe into particles to describe everything from magnetism to what atoms are made of and how they remain stable. The standard model views particles as infinitesimal points, some of which carry basic forces.

Two glaring problems with the standard model: It fails to include gravity, and it becomes gibberish at high energies.

If a theory can be designed (some say it'll never happen) to withstand the incredible energies of the early universe as well as incorporate gravity, then a universal theory of physics could become a reality, researchers figure. [Read More]

2.     Does Alien Life Exist?

Life is everywhere. At least on this planet. So it's logical to assume it might be everywhere in the universe, too. But so far we've only thoroughly examined one world, so the sample size is a bit small.

We know now that the ingredients for life are widely distributed. And we know there are solar systems strikingly like ours our there. "We are here, made of stardust. Therefore, it is at least possible that there are others," said Jill Tarter, director of the Center for SETI Research in California.

And there ought to be some smart life out there, too. "Mankind has achieved scientific-technological civilization only in the last 200 years or so, out of about 4.5 billion years of life on Earth," said Frank Wilczek, a Nobel-Prize winning physicist at MIT. "So it seems we ought to expect there to be many scientific-technological civilizations that have had many millions, or even billions, of years to develop."[Read More]

1.    How Did the Universe Begin?

Yes, the clear winner in our minds, and in your votes. Simply put: "All other mysteries lie downstream of this question," said Ann Druyan, the author and widow of astronomer Carl Sagan. "It matters to me because I am human and do not like not knowing."

Yes, theory holds that it all started with the Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago, with everything starting in a space smaller than the period at the end of this sentence. In the blink of an eye, it all grew to cosmic scales in by a process called inflation. Problem is, while this predicts a lot of what's seen today, it can't be directly tested.

"Inflation is an extremely powerful theory, and yet we still have no idea what caused inflation--or whether it is even the correct theory, although it works extremely well," said Eric Agol, an astrophysicist at the University of Washington. [Read More]

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/090507-top10-greatest-mysteries.html



本文於 修改第 2 次

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=4256674
引用者清單(2)
2010/11/07 02:40 【時事論壇】 科技認證
2010/11/07 02:38 【修練】 大哉問
 回應文章
有朋自網上來 不亦樂乎
    回應給: 麥芽糖(myata) 推薦1


胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

歡迎切磋琢磨。共同學習。
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=4268197
求知
    回應給: 胡卜凱(jamesbkh) 推薦0


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
謝謝市長:

老丐會仔細從各個角度入手, 從修練市發文, 並且轉貼本市回答!


回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=4268147
請參考
    回應給: 胡卜凱(jamesbkh) 推薦1


胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

如果你對上一篇留言(與麥芽糖兄談「求知」)有興趣,請參考《染色體和自閉症及人格分裂症的相關性 -- A. Chan》一欄。



本文於 修改第 1 次

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=4265406
與麥芽糖兄談「求知」
    回應給: 麥芽糖(myata) 推薦2


胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (2)

麥芽糖
胡卜凱

1.    演化論

演化論是以「演化」這個關鍵概念所建立的一套假設或說法,人們用它來解釋生物的起源、生物的種類、各()物種()的近似和差異、以及生物化石在時間向度上不同階段的面貌等等現象

顧名思義,「創造論」以「(上帝)創造」為關鍵概念來解釋上述現象;「智者設計論」以「智者(即上帝)設計」為關鍵概念來解釋同樣的上述現象。

「理論」一詞有兩個層次的意義(或功能)

a.    人們用它來解釋一個或幾個相關現象;

b.    人們根據這個解釋做為研究其他現象的指導原則(提供研究的方向、對象、方法、等等)

就第一個層次來說,「演化論」和「創造論」和「智者設計論」都不相容,也就產生:

「那一個『理論』比較具有解釋能力?」

的爭議。或者具體的說:

「那一個『理論』比較能幫助我們了解自然現實,從而幫助我們解決(自然現實所帶來)生活上的問題?」

就第二個層次來說,為了解釋「演化論」,增加它的解釋能力,以及說明造成「演化」的原因和可能影響「演化」的因素(在《自然科學10大懸案》一文中, force 相當於 cause factor),生物學在過去150年有巨大的成果。100多年來基於「演化論」所累積的生物學知識幫助人類解決了許多生活上的問題;換句話說,這些知識提供我們比較能有效處理生活問題的方法。

「理論」的另一個功能則是做為整合現有知識的「架構」。「演化論」在這一點上也起了很大的作用。

2.    靈魂

大腦神經科學家並沒有迴避「靈魂」這個議題。只是「科學」(= 系統的知識)論述必須根據「證據」。但是,「靈魂」議題和「上帝()是否存在」議題一樣,「證據」難求不可得或根本不適用「證據」這個概念。因此,它們不在科學家研究的範圍;或者如康德所說,它們不是「理性」(相當於科學家所使用的思考方模式)有能力/資格提供答案。事實上,有相當多的科學家試圖用「科學方法」來解釋「靈魂」議題。只是她/他們不使用「靈魂」這個詞彙來迴避上述的難局。

就我的觀點來說,傳統的「靈魂」或「上帝」都是「不相關」的概念。我的意思是:

a.    使用「靈魂」和/或「上帝」這個概念的人,說不清楚它的「所指」;

b.    使用「靈魂」和/或「上帝」這個概念的人,不能根據它建構一個(比其他不使用這個概念的說法)更有效的「理論」,來解釋任何(和生活有關的)現象

c.    /他們也不能驗證根據「靈魂」或「上帝」所建構「理論」所提出的預測。

簡單的說,使用「靈魂」和/或「上帝」這兩個概念的人,不能根據它們建構一個有「實用價值」的理論。所謂「實用」,指能夠「幫助人類解決生活上的問題」。這是我說它們「不相關」的原因。

3.    解釋「所有現象」的「理論」

過去物理學中的「標準理論」試圖解釋所有的現象;霍金在他最新大作中提到「M-理論」可能是一個最有希望的這類理論。雖然「標準理論」沒有能解釋「所有現象」;人類或許永遠不可能建構出一個這樣的理論;但如同我在第二節中對演化論所做的說明,在試圖解釋「所有現象」這個過程中,物理學家在過去近100年中得到巨大的結果,增加了比200年前人類對物理了解豐富幾百倍甚至千倍的知識在整合相關知識和次理論上也有很大的成就。

4.    結論

求知是一個無止境的過程。隨著知識的增加,人類增加了平均壽命,改變了生活環境和品質。對喜歡這個增加和改變的人來說,這是一個進步,也是一個有意義的活動。知識除了幫助許多人混飯吃以外,這是有人窮一生之力於求知的原因或動力。

參考書籍:

* McFadden, J. 2002, Quantum Evolution, W. W. Norton and Co., NYC

* Zimmer, C. 2001, Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea, Perennial, NYC

* ASSC 2008, Proceeding, 12th Annual Meeting, Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness, Taipei

* Velmans, M., Ed. 1996, The Science of Consciousness: Psychological, Neuropsychological, and Clinical Reviews, Routledge, NYC

* Velmans, M., Ed. 2000, Investigating Phenomenal Consciousness: New Methodologies and Maps, John Banjamins Publishing Co., Philadelphia

* Derter, R. 2006, The Theory of Almost Everything: The Standard Model, The Unsung Triumph of Modern Physics, A Plume Book, NYC

* Weinberg, S. 1994, Dream of a Final Theory: The Scientist’s Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature, Vintage Books, NYC



本文於 修改第 3 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=4262591
"10大"只是讀者票選的結果
    回應給: 麥芽糖(myata) 推薦1


胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

麥芽糖

既稱"懸案"表示至少目前無解或沒有一個具有多數共識的理論

其實自然科學上無解的問題多如牛毛

這"10大"只是8,000多位讀者票選的結果

我的標題除了簡化之外也是為了吸引讀者



本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=4261555
my two cents
    回應給: 胡卜凱(jamesbkh) 推薦1


麥芽糖
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

胡卜凱

Well, I don't know, either. Just my two cents, some backed with facts.

10.   What Drives Evolution?
It just happens. No force, no theory. Just happens. Good luck trying to make any theory or find any force.
8.     Who Are You?
I have been searching for this. As shown as my article long time ago refers to this one.
6.     How Does the Brain Work?
The scientist know a lot last five years; however, there is also this thing "soul" that they are avoiding!
3.     Is There a Theory of Everything?
Same as 10. Good luck if anybody tries to make it out.

Yes, you can call me avoiding some of the questions. Guess it's not guilty not to answer if I don't have answer!



回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=4259938