網路城邦
回本城市首頁 時事論壇
市長:胡卜凱  副市長:
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【時事論壇】城市/討論區/
討論區中國脈動錄 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
數字會說話? -- J. McDonald
 瀏覽1,020|回應1推薦0

胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友

China's Official Data Mask Severity of Slump

AP JOE McDONALD (合眾社), 02/06/09

BEIJING) — It is China's disconcerting secret: Its

economic slump is much deeper than official data show.

The government says the economy grew by 6.8 percent in

the final quarter of 2008, but that is based on an outdated

system that measures growth against the same period a

year earlier.

Compared to the previous quarter, the method used by

most major economies, growth was as low as 1 percent

and possibly zero, economists say.

"We sharply decelerated in November and December,"

said Standard Chartered economist Stephen Green.

"There are no clear signals we have accelerated."

If China's economy is indeed barely growing, that would

dash hopes China, the world's third-largest economy,

might drive the world out of recession. It also means

communist leaders face a tougher challenge than

outsiders might think as they scramble to stem a flood of

job losses and ignite a recovery.

Other Asian economies such as Japan and South Korea

are already contracting. Beijing says there are signs its 4

trillion yuan ($586 billion) stimulus launched in November

is taking effect. But its data might be giving companies

and investors an overly positive picture of its current

health.

Other countries such as the United States and Japan

report gross domestic product growth by comparing each

quarter with the previous quarter. That requires more

number-crunching to adjust for seasonal differences but

quickly reveals changes in performance.

The gap is well known to private sector economists, who

try to estimate China's quarter-on-quarter growth based

on skimpy government data.

Fourth-quarter expansion from the previous three months

was "close to zero," said Ting Lu, a Merrill Lynch

economist. Green said his early estimate showed it was

"basically zero," though he raised that to 1 percent after

more calculation. Still, he said, growth was unlikely to

revive in the quarter through March.

That would be more in line with indicators that show

China's exports and manufacturing shrinking and

weakness in investment and consumer spending. The

government says at least 20 million migrant workers have

lost their jobs.

JP Morgan gave a more robust estimate of 1.5 percent

quarter-on-quarter growth. But its figures also highlight a

sharp decline: That rate is just one-tenth of the 15 percent

quarter-on-quarter growth the bank says China achieved

in early 2007.

Recent numbers suggest that China's economy may be

regaining some momentum. A key indicator of

manufacturing improved in January, suggesting the slump

may be bottoming out.

For decades Chinese economic data was thought to be

heavily massaged.

Local leaders were accused of sending Beijing phony

growth figures to make themselves look better. The

government was accused of manipulating the final

numbers to show it was achieving its goals. 

Today, the Cabinet's National Statistics Bureau is

regarded as professional and honest but is struggling to

keep up with China's rapid economic evolution. Its small

staff repeatedly revises past growth estimates as new

data come in.

It was only in 2005 that booming service industries such

as restaurants were counted in economic output. That

forced NBS to revise a decade's worth of growth figures.

But only annual numbers were revised, not those for each

quarter, making it harder for analysts to make historical

comparisons.

"China's statistics system is really in a mess," said Lu.

"It's extremely difficult and close to impossible to calculate

the quarter-on-quarter growth rate in China."

The statistics bureau's boss says it wants to create a

reporting system like those of other countries.

"We are doing research right now on setting up this

system," Commissioner Ma Jiantang said last month,

though he gave no timetable.

Last month, the bureau made the surprise announcement

that it was raising 2007's annual growth rate from an

already stunning 11.9 percent. That meant China

surpassed Germany that year to become the third-largest

economy after the United States and Japan -- a milestone

that went undetected at the time.

For 2009, forecasts of full-year growth are as low as 5

percent -- the best of any major country but China's

weakest in nearly two decades.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1877526,00.html

From:



本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=3257783
 回應文章
中國經濟景氣已探底? -- 時代周刊
推薦0


胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友

 

Is China Bottoming out? Probably Not, And Yet....

A rash of optimism --or maybe forlorn hope--has been

breaking out among some economists who are taking a

variety of recent economic signals as a sign that China's

economy may have hit bottom -- or even begun a

rebound. This seems a clear case of hope triumphing over

experience considering the state of the rest of the world,

but is worth a look. Most widely cited has been the rise in

China's Purchasing Managers Index. The Wall Street

Journal blog has a good round up of economists on this

issue here, all of them hopeful. The ever sensible (and

independent) Michael Pettis has a good assessment of

the significance of this on his blog that doesn't see to

many signs of hope. Then there's the leap in the Baltic

Dry Index, an obscure (to most people) measure of

shipping rates. FT article here that explains why this could

be a one off. Then there's a rise in base metal prices

related to Chinese demand. Economist Jing Ulrich of JP

Morgan has this to say:

The Chinese base metal industries have shown signs

of strengthening after being squeezed by slumping

demand and aggressive destocking for several

months. Some raw material suppliers and observers

have pointed to a recent pick up in steel production,

rising prices and declining iron ore stockpiles as

evidence of a recovery in underlying demand, with

infrastructure spending projects getting underway.

This may however be a premature conclusion -

temporary restocking and government efforts to

support local industry are likely major factors behind

the recent buying.

Ok. So that's that. What else? Some people are also

citing rises in scrap metal prices though I haven't been

able to find much evidence of this. There's also Chinese

consumer confidence over the Lunar New Year holiday

(which still has three days to run). Here's what the chaps

over at Access Asia say:

... the news has been pretty good. Not only have

Chinese consumers been spending, but, according to

the official estimates, consumers have been very

mobile as well. The initial estimates put retail sales

13.8% up on the same period in 2008, with sales of

food up 23% y-o-y, beverages up 17.5% and

tobacco and alcohol up 14.7%. Meanwhile, there

was a 15% increase recorded for growth in tourist

traffic and revenue at 19 key national destinations

last week, compared with the same week in 08,

rising to between 20% and 40% growth in Jiangsu,

Zhejiang and Guangdong.

Official estimates are prone to political massage (we are

well aware), and yes, first month trends do not provide a

failsafe test for future economic trends throughout the

year. Yet, the slowdown in China does not appear to be

affecting the domestic consumer market, and although

China's economy is still seeing strong growth, despite the

drop in the export manufacturing sector, the economy

seems to be shifting itself away from its addiction to

export sales, and adapting to a growing domestic market.

A bit of a thin reed to base the very large conclusion

reached in the last sentence, methinks. Still the Access

Asia do know their stuff and first came to China when

Peking man was still that fellow with the fancy flints so

their views must be added to the mix. Even the miserable

Shanghai Composite Index, now down two thirds (!) from

its high a year and a bit ago has managed a wheezy rally 

this week.

So, is it all over and we can now sleep soundly in our

beds -- in China at least? No. But it certainly bears careful

watching. China's economy is a vast and unique thing

which few people would claim to comprehend. Trying to

figure out any economy is like driving two hundred miles

an hour and using the rear view mirror to navigate, as

someone once remarked. In China's case it's probably a

thousand miles an hour wearing a blindfold. Doesn't mean

we shouldn't keep trying to get a squint at that mirror

though, if you'll excuse a far too lengthily over-extended

metaphor. Eventually we should see a familiar landmark. 

The China Blog, Time, 02/0509

轉貼自︰

http://china.blogs.time.com/2009/02/05/is-china-bottoming-out-probably-not-and-yet/

 

 



本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=3257796