網路城邦
回本城市首頁 時事論壇
市長:胡卜凱  副市長:
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【時事論壇】城市/討論區/
討論區知識和議題 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
大腦神經網路連接論的實驗例證 -- LiveScience Staff
 瀏覽1,292|回應2推薦1

胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (1)

胡卜凱

Your Brain Sees $$$ More Clearly Than You Know

LiveScience Staff, LiveScience.com

When you see something of value, your brain essentially

sees dollar signs, a new study finds.

The effect occurs even if you don't consciously realize the

object's worth.

Researchers scanned the brains of subjects who were

presented with choices of constantly changing red and

green objects that represented 10 cents or nothing, with

good choices in a game leading to potential winnings of

$10.

Upon seeing objects that had been of value previously,

brain activity lit up in several areas, including a part of the

cortex known as V1, which is associated with

representing basic features such as edge orientations

and color.

"When a target had been valuable in the past - if selecting

it had had paid off with money - the visual system 

represented it more strongly," said lead researcher John

Serences, assistant professor of psychology at the

University of California, San Diego. Rewards affected

information processing in this initial sense and also in

parts of the brain where higher cognitive thinking takes

place.

"Though it is too early to say how this relates to

perception," Serences said, "it raises the intriguing

possibility that we see things we value more clearly -

much like the way the brain responds to a bright object

versus a dimly lit one."

In fact, the brain seemed to know more than a participant 

was able to call to mind: The changes in neural activity

were a better sign of an object's past value than what

subjects recalled when asked about those objects.

"It's as if the visual system is telling you how valuable

something has been to you in the past," Serences said,

"and telling it to you like it is, even though you can't

consciously identify it."

The findings are reported in the Dec. 26 issue of the

journal Neuron. Further study could help researchers

better understand how addictions influence information

processing, Serences said. Just seeing food or drugs, for

example, might have a larger impact on the psyches of

some people than others.

·           5 Ways to Boost Your Brain 

·           Culture Fundamentally Alters the Brain 

·           World Trivia: Challenge Your Brain 

轉貼自︰

http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20081227/sc_livescience/yourbrainseesmoreclearlythanyouknow;_ylt=AqdGnzk5Upq7DhAmsBGgcHkbr7sF



本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=3180129
 回應文章
何以嬰兒需要一段時間才能行走 - J. Bryner
推薦0


胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友

 

Study Reveals Why Infants Can't Walk

Jeanna Bryner, LiveScience.com., Senior Writer,

Scientists have figured out the underlying reason why human babies can't walk at birth while foals and other hoofed animals get up and go within hours of being born. Turns out, all mammals essentially take their first steps at the same point in brain development.

A team of scientists has come up with a model that can predict the onset of those first steps with information on the weight of that animal's mature brain (which indicates brain development time) and whether the species stands with its heels touching the ground like us or like cats and horses.

The results suggest "the neuronal mechanisms that underlie the onset of walking are very similar in different mammals, and that they are activated at a very similar relative time point during brain development," said lead researcher Martin Garwicz of Lund University in Sweden.

The upshot is that while humans might not walk until just under 1 year of age and an elephant shrew at just 1 day old, both organisms hit this milestone at the same point in their brain development.

The research is published this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Longstanding mystery

"It's something I've always wondered about," Garwicz told LiveScience. "Even children ask this question - How come a little foal can start walking straight after birth and it takes us such a long time?"

His previous work on rats and ferrets had hinted at the relationship between brain development and walking onset. But he wondered if this link was an exception to the rule.

To find out, Garwicz and his colleagues looked at the relationship between various factors, such as brain size and limb biomechanics, and the onset of walking for 24 mammal species, including aardvarks, chimpanzees, guinea pigs, sheep, hippos and camels. Together, such animals belonged to 11 of the 14 orders of terrestrial mammals that walk.

And rather than the conventional way in which people talk about the onset of walking, the researchers started the clock at conception. For humans, that would add about nine months to this walking clock.

Sure enough, they saw a pattern that could mostly be explained by differences in brain mass. The fact that the pattern only showed up when looking at the time from conception suggests brain development occurs along this continuum that extends from conception through early development out of the womb, Garwicz said.

They also found limb biomechanics was involved in the timing of walking onset, though not as important of a factor as brain mass. Specifically, animals that stand on the full length of their hind feet (like us) take longer to reach those first steps.

The researchers suspect this link is also related to the brain, because the hind limbs of this so-called plantigrade stance are more complex biomechanically than those of horses, say, that don't place their heels on the ground. That biomechanical complexity likely requires more brain power to operate, and thus more time to get moving in early development.

Human brains not so special

The finding could help to explain why human babies are helpless for such a long time following their birth. Until now, one idea has been that our brains are so large and complex and we learn so many other things while also developing our motor skills that it takes longer for us to gain our footing.

"With respect to walking onset, those assumptions are wrong," Garwicz said. "It is possible using our model and data from other mammals you can predict when a human baby will start walking despite the fact that we walk on two legs, despite the fact that we have a large brain, and despite the fact that we learn many other things."

The finding also suggests the human noggin is not just the result of an advancement of the brain in non-human primates. Rather, our brains may be very similar to various other animals with the only exception really being time - how long our brains are allotted for development.

"By increasing the time of development we grow a brain that is so much larger and so much more complex, and at first glance would seem so different from other species," Garwicz said. "But maybe the underlying principles and building blocks of development are similar in different species."

Garwicz's colleagues included Maria Christensson of Lund University and Elia Psouni of Lund University and Kristianstad University in Sweden.

Top 10 Things That Make Humans Special 

10 Things You Didn't Know About You 

5 Myths About the Male Body 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20091214/sc_livescience/studyrevealswhyinfantscantwalk;_ylt=AhRHxzgrpbcoz6MvN7VRwIAbr7sF



本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=3737081
實驗結果的應用
推薦1


胡卜凱
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

胡卜凱

這個實驗的結果除了支持大腦神經網路連接論」外,還能應用到古典心理學上。

根據何卜假說 -- 我們的經驗或學習過程會加強相關大腦神經網路的連接強度 -- 如果我們加上電子物理學和(電機工程)電路理論中的「引發(激活)」以及「耦合」兩個概念,就能用這個(和類似的)實驗來解釋巴伏洛夫的「制約」理論和行為主義的「刺激 -- 反應說」。

報告中的

In fact, the brain seemed to know more than a

participant was able to call to mind: The changes

in neural activity were a better sign of an object's

past value than what subjects recalled when asked

about those objects.

"It's as if the visual system is telling you how

valuable something has been to you in the past,"

Serences said, "and telling it to you like it is, even

though you can't consciously identify it."

可以如此了解

神經網路對觀察到現象是直接反應;我們的「判斷」過程往往會考慮到其他因素。所以神經網路的反應比我們經過「判斷」過程得到的決定要快。

******************************************

引發(激活)truggering

何卜假說Hebb's theory

制約(classical) conditioning

耦合coupling



本文於 修改第 6 次

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:https://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=2976&aid=3180205