Religion Not the Only Path to Altruism
Robin Lloyd, Senior Science Editor,
LiveScience.com, livescience.com
Religion and its promotion of empathy get undue credit for
our unselfish acts. Instead, it's our less-than-virtuous
psychological perception that a moral authority is
watching us that promotes altruism, a new review essay
suggests.
The essay is based on two psychologists' re-examination
of dozens of studies that have dealt with the relationship
between religious participation and so-called prosocial
behavior, a term that includes charity, cooperation,
volunteerism, honesty, trust and various forms of personal
sacrifice. The Biblical parable of the Good Samaritan is a
classic example.
The upshot is surprising: While religion can play a role in
fostering altruism, it is far from the only institution capable
of doing so and it might not work the way we assume,
says review co-author Azim Shariff, a graduate student at
the University of British Columbia.
To the extent that religion does promote altruism, it might
actually be effective because adherents think that some
authority figure is watching them to make sure they "do
the right thing," or because they want to maintain their
reputations as righteous followers of religious teachings.
Also, studies that do show a link between altruism and
religion are often based on self-reports - subjects saying
they did something unselfish, rather than direct
observation of them doing so. This type of data is
notoriously unreliable.
"We found little or no evidence that empathy plays any
role in religious prosociality," said lead author Ara
Norenzayan, a UBC social psychologist, adding that jury
is still out. Religious types might engage in unselfish
generosity coming from a place of empathy or
compassion, but there is currently no data to support this,
he said.
Humans are evolved to be acutely sensitive to our
reputations as do-gooders in our social groups because
this promotes strong cooperative bonds that help the
species. This psychological mechanism was originally
unrelated to religion, the authors write in the Oct. 3 issue
of the journal Science.
The review also shoots down the idea that religion is
necessary to make people choose to engage in altruistic
behavior - or do something that benefits others at your
own personal expense. Religion has no monopoly on
good behavior today, Norenzayan said.
In fact, the courts, police, cameras, credit records and
other justice-related authorities can serve the same
purpose nowadays, encouraging proscial behavior among
large groups of strangers.
"The fact that many non-religious people act as
cooperatively as religious ones, and that many
predominantly secular states are as (and often more)
stable and functional as predominantly religious ones,
attests to this," Shariff told LiveScience.
Not to mention that not all religiously inspired prosocial
behavior is good - it can have a "dark side," the authors
say. Charity is obviously for the good of all, but giving for
the group at your own expense is very undesirable when
taken to extremes, as in the case of suicide bombers,
who make the ultimate sacrifice. Similarly, kamikaze pilots
in World War II made a prosocial sacrifice with their fatal
flights - it was for the good of their nation's war effort but
they killed and bombed others, which is very antisocial.
Also, altruism is sometimes extended only to the "worthy"
or excludes certain people.
Shariff stresses that he and Norenzayan have no axe to
grind with religion. The essay they wrote "is only out there
to help understanding," Shariff said. The desirability of
religion and its ability to get at the truth is an issue best
left to philosophers and theologians, Norenzayan said.
The writing of the essay was supported by a Social
Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
grant.
Richard P. Sloan, a professor of behavioral medicine at
Columbia University Medical Center who has done
research on spirituality and medicine but was uninvolved
in the new review essay, said he agreed that empathy,
compassion and altruism can be induced in society
without religion.
"I don't believe there is any evidence to support the
necessity of religion for prosocial behavior," Sloan said.
"There are people who make the argument that altruism
and prosocial behavior evolutionarily preceded the
development of religion for a long time. You can see
evidence of altruistic behavior in humans dating back for
a long time."
· Audio: Does Science Condemn God?
· Monsters, Ghosts and Gods: Why We Believe
· Top 10 Conspiracy Theories
轉貼自︰
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20081027/sc_livescience/religionnottheonlypathtoaltruism;_ylt=AvNwiDTpWiG8kVutdTDRnNkbr7sF
本文於 修改第 1 次