Stand Down: Black Holes Won't Destroy Earth
Jeanna Bryner, Senior Writer, LiveScience.com
The world's largest, most powerful particle smasher
probably won't generate any planet-gobbling black holes,
according to a new analysis.
That's contrary to suggestions in a news article
Wednesday that invoked a possible doomsday scenario
and said black holes created by the collider could stick
around longer than predicted.
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a 17-mile (27-kilometer)
circular tunnel running 300 feet (91 meters) underground
at the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN)
near Geneva, is expected to recreate the conditions that
occurred a fraction of a second after the Big Bang, the
theoretical instant in which the universe was born from an
incredibly small point.
By smashing protons together at nearly the speed of light,
the LHC could help to solve mysteries about the origin of
mass and the reasons for more matter than antimatter in
the universe.
(The LHC was shut down last year after a helium leak was
discovered within days of its initial powering up. The
machine is scheduled to re-start again some time this
year, according to CERN.)
Scientists have speculated the proton-to-proton collisions
could possibly generate microscopic black holes. These
black holes would be orders of magnitude smaller and less
massive than the gravity wells produced by the collapse
of stars and known to exist in the universe, said Howard
Gordon of Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York,
who also works at the LHC.
Even still, fears arose in the past few years that the LHC
could churn out a black hole that would gobble up
everything in sight, including our planet.
Why the fears? "I think it's the confusion between the
massive black holes in the universe and these
microscopic black holes that possibly could get created,"
Gordon told LiveScience. "It's a difference in scale."
Black-hole model
The new analysis, detailed online at ArXiv.org, a
repository for new research papers, suggests again that
the LHC probably can't generate a catastrophic black
hole.
Gordon said the analysis is based on a theoretical model
and that further research is needed to confirm the results.
Roberto Casadio of the University of Bologna in Italy and
his University of Alabama colleagues Benjamin Harms and
Sergio Fabi based their theoretical model on the so-called
Randall-Sundrum brane-world scenario, in which the four-
dimensional universe is embedded within a five-
dimensional space.
"All we're doing is taking a model of our space-time, where
we live, and exploring the consequences," Harms said
during a telephone interview. "And our exploration shows
that black holes could not grow large enough to become
catastrophic in the sense that they could do damage to
the Earth or anything in the Earth."
He added, "What we found was that if black holes are
created at the LHC, they would not be able to grow to
catastrophic size because the accretion rate is simply not
great enough to offset the evaporation rate."
In fact, the model showed that once a black hole is
created by the LHC (if that were to happen), the only way
to get the black hole to grow would be "to extend the size
of one of the parameters in our model beyond a physically
accepted value," so beyond what is physically possible.
And then, such a black hole would evaporate, and
essentially vanish, within one-trillionth to one-millionth of a
second, the model showed. While the black holes might
not truly vanish, their masses would become so small they
would have no effect on Earth.
One small caveat is that the results only apply to Earth
because they depend partly on the density of material
through which the black holes are traveling.
Creating black holes
"Large Hadron Collider had a tremendous amount of
publicity last year because of the black hole
speculations," Gordon said, adding, "We don't know for
sure we're even going to see black holes in the Large
Hadron Collider."
Here's the logic behind the LHC generating microscopic
black holes:
Various models of the universe suggest extra dimensions
(other than those of space and time) exist and are folded
up into sizes ranging from that of a proton to as big as a
fraction of a millimeter. The models go on to suggest that
at distances comparable to such sizes, gravity becomes
far stronger. If this is true, the collider could smash
enough energy together to generate gravitational
collapses that produce black holes.
Researchers have calculated that under such scenarios,
the accelerator could create a microscopic black hole
anywhere from every second to every day.
Harmless black holes
Physicists have repeatedly said that fears about these
artificial black holes are "groundless."
For instance, microscopic black holes would probably lose
more mass than they absorb and so would evaporate
immediately.
Say a black hole was created and that black hole was
stable. "Then their interactions would be very weak. They
would pass harmlessly into space. They would vanish,"
Gordon said, referring to stable black holes with no
electrical charge.
In addition, as CERN scientists have pointed out, Earth is
bathed with cosmic rays powerful enough to create black
holes, and the planet hasn't been destroyed yet.
At the end of the day, Gordon said, the LHC is safe and
so are we.
"We're expecting the discoveries at the Large Hadron
Collider to be significant and exciting, but we are pretty
sure that the collider is safe and will not be causing any
trouble to people living on Earth," Gordon said.
· Will the Large Hadron Collider Destroy Earth?
· Despite Rumors, Black Hole Factory Will Not Destroy Earth
· Search for Magical Dark Matter Gets Real
轉貼自︰
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20090128/sc_livescience/standdownblackholeswontdestroyearth;_ylt=AshK62yWPFiyV5zAMhE0Sa4br7sF
本文於 修改第 1 次