網路城邦
回本城市首頁 solarism
市長:sunism  副市長:
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會公共議題【solarism】城市/討論區/
討論區不分版 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
川普弟兄白宮開始內閣查經班 重現百年敬虔風範
 瀏覽3,678|回應20推薦14

天恩客
等級:8
留言加入好友
文章推薦人 (14)

注意
we do
Yvony
令果
嘉嘉是一隻吸血鬼
米酒
bella38
我愛繽紛樂
一江春水向東流
俞ck

more...

川普弟兄白宮開始內閣查經班 

重現百年敬虔風範

在十位內閣成員的支持下、白宮重新開始了每週一次的基督教查經班。每週的星期三舉行、一般是60-90分鐘、主要由副總統彭斯主持。這是美國白宮百年歷史的首次。

而國會山莊巳經持續多年了,目前已經增長到50位國會議員了。

由牧師帶領總統及部長等的禱告和查經,驅使代表美國政府的敬虔基督徒閣員、他們的良心必須真實的面對上帝

台灣旅行法創下多重的巧合(在上帝手上沒有偶然)

1. 眾議院無異議全票通過;參議院採用眾議院版本一樣的無異議全票通過。兩院全票通過的意義是:1)本案是美國的國家利益、2)本案是台灣人天賦人權的恢復案、美國必須要補償的議案!

天恩客翻譯台灣旅行法

法案還原漢文如下:

第一章 法案名稱:台灣旅行法

第二章 已發掘事因

2-1. 台灣關係法1979年生效以來、提供西太平洋域的安全與和平巳達37年矣;

2-2. 台灣關係法巳宣誓了美國在西太平洋域針對政治、安全、及經濟利益的立場,亦是國際社會所關切的事項;

2-3. 美國認為用和平以外的方式試圖改變台灣的未來命運,包含杯葛、及禁運得視為對西太平洋域和平與安全的威脅,會使美國進入「生死之博」的考慮;

2-4. 台灣的民主在一九八十年代末巳開始轉型、至今成為許多亞洲國家及人民「耳目一新」的烽火台及典範(暗示獨立自主的國格已成形);

2-5. 鑒於美國的內閣及高級官員如何訪問一個國家、可視為兩國關係的廣度和深度「的表徵」;

2-6. 並基於台灣關係法中、早巳虧缺於美國自我設限雙方高官交往及互訪「的事實」;

第三章 眾議之案旨及政策要義

a) 眾議院之本案要旨 - 美國政府應鼓勵美國及台灣雙方各級官員的互訪。

b) 政策要義 - 美國國家應有以下政策:

3-1) 允許美國政府所有層級官員含內閣國安官員、領導官員、及分部執行官員訪問台灣並會見對等的台灣官員;

3-2) 允許台灣高級官員在有尊榮條件下訪問美國的官員們、含國務院、國防部、和內閣部會;

3-3) 鼓勵台北經濟文化代表處及其所設之單位、在美國開展業務。業務活動所需配合的、「含」美國國會議員、聯邦政府、地方政府、以及台灣高級官員均得參與。

+

特別注意:

37年前的臺灣關係法美國早已不再提出「中華民國政府」和「臺灣政府」這一名詞了「中華民國」就已經算是永久消失了「中華民國」能代表中國

美國只提到「臺灣的官員」、所以中共無計可施!

2. 參議院又刻意選在2月28日通過、代表了以基督教立國的美國、以第三方參與了台灣人額外的救贖!

3. 川普總統刻意在3月16日、簽署了法案使其生效。聖經約翰福音3章16節正提到上帝的救恩:「神愛世人、甚至𧶽祂的獨生子⋯⋯不致滅亡反得永生!

4. 飄揚在中華民國臺灣的青天白日旗、正巧於1895年的3月16日被以基督徒為主的興中會革命志士所批准使用的


5. 今年的復活節4月1日、基督徒仍循例使用聖經以賽亞書53章5節來慶祝:「上帝的聖子祂為我們受害⋯因祂的鞭傷⋯我們得醫治、因祂的刑罰⋯我們得平安」、輝映已通過的法案535號了!

6. 就在美國於4月1日也慶祝「愚人節」之時,不知「敬天愛民」的中共獨裁政權、一枚與天爭峰的「天宮」衛星、因「意外」正式「墮入」南海的「軍事強佔海域中」、上帝不也已經透過萬象定了是非了!

7. 美國新國務卿龐彼歐弟兄、由川普弟兄選在台灣烈士鄭南榕就義紀念日、也是國家言論自由日的4月7日白宮上任、更是絕無巧合。

其它詳細內容請參考英文報導!

Inside the White House Bible Study group

 

By Owen Amos BBC News, Washington DC      8 April 2018

hare

For the first time in at least 100 years, the US Cabinet has a bible study group. What do they learn? What does Donald Trump make of it? And why aren't women allowed to teach?

Every Wednesday, some of the world's most powerful people meet in a conference room in Washington DC to learn about God.

The location can't be revealed - the Secret Service won't allow it - but the members can.

Vice-President Mike Pence. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. Energy Secretary Rick Perry. Attorney General Jeff Sessions. The list goes on.

In total, 10 cabinet members are "sponsors" of the group. Not everyone attends every meeting - they are busy people - but they go if they can.

Meetings last between 60 and 90 minutes, and members are free to contact the teacher after-hours. So who is the man leading the United States' most-influential bible study?

Step forward Ralph Drollinger, a seven-foot tall basketball pro turned pastor. Or, as the 63-year-old describes himself: "Just a jock with some bad knees."

 

Drollinger grew up in La Mesa, a suburb of San Diego, California. As a child, he rarely went to church - "Probably half a dozen times," he says - and didn't get far with the Bible.

"I always promised myself I'd read it," he says. "But every time I tried, it didn't make a whole lot of sense to me."

In his last year of high school, after a basketball game, some cheerleaders invited him to bible study. He went, and his world changed.

"It was the first time I really heard the gospel," he says. "So I went home, read through the whole gospel of Matthew that night, and asked Jesus into my heart."

In 1972, Drollinger went to the University of California in Los Angeles on a basketball scholarship. He attended a bible-teaching church and, over the next four years, "fell in love with the scriptures".

After college, he could have played pro basketball - he was picked in the NBA draft three times - but, each time, turned it down.

"I sensed such a passion for ministry that everything paled in comparison," he says.

Instead, he signed for a Christian team called Athletes in Action. They played basketball around the world - 35 countries, he reckons - and preached the gospel at half-time.

"That was kind of perfect for me," he says. "Because I really didn't like basketball - but I liked to preach."

Drollinger did eventually turn pro, signing for the Dallas Mavericks in 1980, but only because he wanted to attend the seminary there. He played six games in the NBA and left after one season.

After retiring from basketball he worked in sports ministries, before turning to politics in 1996. The road to the White House started with failing Christians in California.

In 1996, Drollinger's wife, Danielle, was executive director of a political action committee in California trying to unseat liberals from the state legislature and get Christians elected.

"But she was frustrated," he says. "They would send guys to California's capitol - and she was great at getting them elected - but they would soon lose their Christian moorings."

So they took over the existing ministry in Sacramento, changed the name, and offered weekly bible studies, support, prayer, and one-on-one ministry.

It proved "wildly successful", so they expanded. Capitol Ministries is now in 43 US state capitols, and more than 20 legislatures abroad.

Each class is led by a local pastor, but none is led by a woman. Why not?

"There's no [Biblical] prohibition of female leadership in commerce, there's no prohibition of female leadership in the state, and there's no prohibition of female leadership over children," says Drollinger.

"But there is a prohibition of female leadership in marriage, and female leadership in the church. And those are clear in scripture… it doesn't mean, in an egalitarian sense, that a woman is of lesser importance. It's just that they have different roles."

In 2010, Capitol Ministries arrived in Washington. There was already a ministry called The Fellowship, which runs the National Prayer Breakfast, but Drollinger felt it had "lost its marbles, Biblically".

It was, he says, candy floss Christianity - big, sweet, unsubstantial. By contrast, he wants to offer a "high-protein diet", teaching the bible book-by-book, one verse at a time. In Drollinger's studies, it can take a year to finish one book.

"If you don't have a spiritual coach that's really driving you in the word of God - and driving you toward holiness rather than your own sinful, latent nature, and your own depravity - then you're not going to grow into Christ's likeness," he says.

The Fellowship, he says, believes legislators can do bible study among themselves.

"I say no, technical foul. 'How will they hear without a preacher?' Romans 10:15."

Capitol Ministries began a bible study for representatives in 2010, which now has almost 50 members.

When four of the group were elected to the Senate, they asked for a senators' class, which began in 2015. Last March - two months after Donald Trump took office - the same process led to a group for cabinet members.

"Trump started appointing to his cabinet all the guys that were in our House and Senate bible study," says Drollinger, a trend he attributes to Vice-President Mike Pence, who "knew who those strong believers were".

"Unlike our secular media," Drollinger says, he and others saw the appointees had something in common - they "were strong in Christ".

"So Jeff Sessions, [former health secretary] Tom Price, others, said let's start a ministry, a Cabinet bible study."

Capitol Ministries believes it is the first Cabinet-level bible study for "at least 100 years". There was a group during George W Bush's presidency, but it was for lower-ranking staff members.

President Trump is not a member of Drollinger's group - but he is a Christian, and does get Drollinger's eight-page print-outs most weeks.

"He writes me back notes on my bible studies," says Drollinger.

"He's got this leaky Sharpie felt-tip pen that he writes all capital letters with. 'Way to go Ralph, really like this study, keep it up.' Stuff like that."

 

Drollinger's weekly bible studies are not private, or secret. Anyone can read them online.

 

On same-sex marriage, he writes: "Homosexuality and same-sex ceremonies are illegitimate in God's eyes. His word is repetitive, perspicuous [clearly expressed], and staid on the subject."

 

On capitalism, he writes: "The right to personal property, also known as free enterprise or capitalism, is the governmental economic system supported by scripture. Scripture does not support communism."

 

And on debt, he writes: "It is bad stewardship and downright foolishness for an individual, family, or country to borrow in order to cover expenses that far, far exceed income!"

 

So if politicians should learn from the Bible, should - for example - gay people be put to death? No, says Drollinger - some civil laws from the Old Testament should not apply.

"I think that was for [ancient] Israel, but it's not for the church," he says, adding he doesn't import "the whole kit and caboodle of Old Testament law" like "the clumsy theonomist would".

Drollinger likens himself to a waiter in a restaurant. These lessons aren't his - he is merely serving the word of God, as revealed in the Bible, to self-professed Christians.

"If God is the chef, then I'm just the servant, and I hope the guys like the meal," he says. "But on the way out of the kitchen, I'm not going to alter what's on the plate. So my job is just to be a servant."

And if people don't like the message - or, to put it his way, the meal?

"You have to go talk to the chef [God]. Unless I've altered what's on the plate - which, hopefully in my discipline, I don't."

Drollinger believes the Bible teaches the separation of church and state.

"We have to differentiate," he says. "And unfortunately, a lot of our evangelical religious right advocates have not made this differentiation."

In January, when a New York Times opinion piece described Drollinger and others as "Christian nationalists", he wrote a 1400-word letter to complain. What was his objection?

"It has the idea of tyranny when you take it to its extreme," he says.

"It means that I'm meeting with the Cabinet members clandestinely in order to overthrow the government - in the form that we presently have - for a theocracy. I mean, at the end of the day, that's the accusation, and I have to be strong on that."

But is a bible study for Cabinet members, with political themes, not a merging of church and state?

"I believe in institutional separation, but not influential separation," he says

"No matter what the institution is - the family, commerce, education - it needs the bulwark precepts of the word of God in order to function correctly…

"But the minute I start to amalgamate the church and the state institutionally, then I'm into theocracy."

Drollinger never tells his members how to vote, or which policies to pursue. But he hopes it becomes obvious by teaching them the Bible.

"I will put the blueprint on the engineer's seat on the train," he says. "And it will show you the right tracks to the station.

"But I'm not going to tell you what tracks to take. But you've got to be pretty stupid not to follow the blueprint, because it's there."

Do his students ever disappoint him?

"Oh yeah, I get disappointed a lot when I see immaturity," he says. "I was just talking to one member... his wife hates him. He's been overspending his capital in his marriage by working 14 hours a day on politics.

"That's disappointed me, because if he is divorced, then what kind of credibility does he really have long-term in the House [of Representatives] to make moral judgments?"

And what about their policies?

"When a person obviously knows the Biblical thing to do and votes against what he or she knows what's Biblical."

One Democrat, struggling with her party's support for same-sex marriage, contacted Drollinger for advice. He explained the Bible's teaching, as he saw it.

"The next bible study, she said 'that was really good'. Now she can't necessarily stand publicly on what I just taught her, but it's going on in her heart."

He says he won't tell her how to vote on the issue - voicing opposition to marriage might cost her an election.

"But at the same time, she's going to have to think, what's different between that and a prostitute? A prostitute sells her soul to maintain a salary. Are you as a Christian legislator, growing in Christ, selling your convictions in order to stay making a salary, or have influence?

"I'll never say it that graphically to a member. But you get my idea."



本文於 修改第 4 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5780000
 回應文章 頁/共2頁 回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁
沒有更有力的東西 是鬥不過邪惡的
    回應給: 飛到東又飛到西(ten99) 推薦3


注意
等級:5
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (3)

扣扣
心情如雲和風
服務很好

人類的進程中,花了多少力量從蒙昧走向啟蒙? 從蠻荒走向繁榮? 黑暗走到光明?

這個過程中多少魔鬼因著人因著神被收服?

像林肯這樣的人,真是值得佩服的

「在曠野有人聲喊著說:『預備主的道,修直他的路!』」的一位僕人

這幾天,在美國建國的首都費城(Philadelphia)居然還是發生了歧視黑人的事件!

不得不讓人佩服林肯的勇氣與智慧

在一片黑暗中,也期許自己與大家都來抵禦邪惡、保持清醒,當『修直他的路!』」的工人

 

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5783697
本文已被刪除
推薦2


ss77
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (2)

注意
服務很好

本文因「貼錯地方 請轉駕 http://city.udn.com/59483/5771464」,已由 ss77(ss77) 於 2018/04/21 03:33刪除。

 


哈哈哈,偶而學學無恥黨工的洗版把戲,大家都Happy weekend一下

Fox恭喜恭喜

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5783641
紅二代的教育失敗
    回應給: 天恩客(jesusismysavior) 推薦1


ss77
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

注意

馬二代只知道投機取巧、偷雞摸狗、考試特權加分

所以他們行事是很宮廷的、很低能的

紅二代沒有紅一代的苦幹磨練、也完全沒有思維的訓練

所以他們只有小學程度

不像老毛多謀、也不如鄧小平的橋牌你來我往的細膩

養尊處優的結果,只有滿腦子的霸權與蠻橫

「預言」曝光!鄧小平不許大陸稱霸 隔空掌摑習近平

2018/03/13 10:36:00
好友人數 
  • A-
  •  
  • A
  •  
  • A+

大陸中心/綜合報導

前(11)日全國人大會議投票表決中共憲法修正草案,其中最受關注的莫過於刪除國家主席、副主席「連續任職不得超過兩屆」的規定,不到30分鐘的投票,最後以2964的高票確定刪除,也就是說,大陸國家主席習近平可延任到2023年之後。對於國家主席任期限制取消,遭外界認為形同習近平稱帝一事,有眼尖的網友發現,其實已故的大陸領導人鄧小平曾在1974年隔空掌摑習,並要全世界和中國大陸人民「打倒它」。

▲大陸國家主席習近平確定可延任到2023年之後。(圖/翻攝自李忠憲臉書)

中國大陸確定廢除國家主席任期限制,看在外界眼裡,這分明等於是讓習近平名副其實地「稱帝」。除了部分陸網友、外國給予負面評價外,有眼尖的民眾發現,被普遍視為「實際的最高領導人」的已故大陸領導人鄧小平,早在1974年發表談話時充分地表達自己的立場,強調絕對不會讓中國大陸稱霸世界,而是要與中國大陸的人民共進退,「中國人民同世界人民利益的一致性」。

▲鄧小平在世時曾反對中國大陸稱霸。(圖/翻攝自人民網)

習近平完全打破鄧小平所建立的「政治繼承」制度!對於習可以延任大陸國家主席,有許多人拿出鄧小平在1974年、時任中國大陸副總理時所演講的內容,發現當年的鄧小平似乎早料到習可能「稱帝」,所以內容清楚地喊話人民應該反對,讓不少網友直呼,這分明是隔空掌摑習近平,「鄧小平根本是先知啊」、「還是鄧小平聰明」。

綜合陸媒報導,在1974年時任大陸副總理的鄧小平,曾發表過,如果中國大陸有朝一日變了顏色,成了一個超級大國並在世界稱霸,到處欺負人家、剝削人家,「世界人民就應當給中國戴上一頂社會帝國主義的帽子,就應當揭露它,反對它,並且同中國人民一道,打倒它。」不僅如此,同年鄧小平出席聯合國會議的幕後談話,也清楚被記錄著這段內容,鄧強調,「中國現在不是,將來也不做超級大國」。

除了充分表達中國絕不稱霸世界的決心外,鄧小平當年更要參加起草工作的淩青一字一句完整記下他所說的話,絕對不用更改,因為他要大家記著,若是中國哪天變了顏色,「全世界人民同中國人民一道,『打倒它』!」如今習近平的任期延長、野心被看穿,不少人認為完全背離鄧小平的初衷,甚至覺得鄧當年的談話根本神預測,甚至像是隔空44年掌摑想「稱帝」的習近平。

 

 http://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=356956 



本文於 修改第 1 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5783579
一針見血
    回應給: 天恩客(jesusismysavior) 推薦1


注意
等級:5
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (1)

ss77

這是兩岸愈交流鴻溝卻愈來愈大的主因
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5783572
中共永遠抓不住好牌
    回應給: ss77(ss77) 推薦3


天恩客
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (3)

扣扣
服務很好
ss77

中共用你死我活鬥爭的方式,或笑裏藏刀的方式,永遠抓不住好牌的!

朋友是贏來的、不是抓來或買來的!

台灣小而大陸大、不「以大侍小」、大陸永遠沒有出路!誰能「以大侍小」呢?

其實不難、永遠愛我們的父母做得到!

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5783146
金三胖真是本世紀最厲害的政治人物
    回應給: 天恩客(jesusismysavior) 推薦5


ss77
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (5)

艾爾思
服務很好
天恩客
注意
蘋果貓

最抓的準時機,也看透了習!

現在北京已落入被動的局面,等著金三胖跟美歐日韓談完禮物後一腳踢!

至於核彈這玩意,反正我已經證明我有技術了,已經進核子俱樂部了,有濃縮鈾、有predetonation先期啟動器了,那玩意而反正用不得,樂得當籌碼!(啟動器這種東東對台灣這種資訊電子大國來說,根本就是piece of cake)

說來北京不知道是笨還是賤?

本來握著一手好牌,偏偏搞到時機盡失、豬羊變色!

一個"維持現狀"不要,偏偏要搞到準備2020奪權的"務實台獨工作者"下賤的新系全面奪權! 

唉! 這只能說天意如此了!

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5782892
腦白金靠核終脫中入西了!
推薦4


天恩客
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (4)

心情如雲和風
注意
ss77
we do

金三胖三代淚血侍中共、靠核終脫中入西了!穢台幫要哭潰了!

人家金三胖留學歐洲懂西方這一套!可惜「羽」被迫下鄉只懂「毛」零和 Zero Sum 鬥爭得你死我活、落伍的那一套!一下子就巳被比下去了!

羽毛「會前」能見金,「會中」「會後」要見金得 long Q 排隊了!

古曰大而無當果真成就了大就會無當的中共、「大恐龍」大賣「腦白金」是自取滅亡的!

人家留歐洲金腦加川白、用中醫術入藥、羽毛把「腦白金」賣走了、即將讓無腦恐龍的真相現身了!

國師便宜無好貨!一是無腦太監持續關押「有愛國魂的知識份子良心犯」、二又厚嫁倒貼送走了「有腦金三胖」、三則化友為敵搞爛了「川普和西方白人國際社會」原本的好關係!

至此、原惠台卻已實証「穢台」五毛黨也該魂魄飄回玻璃恐龍國了!

滿地忠魂血、盡顯青天白日恩!世道滄桑愧對先祖、令不勝唏噓!

故園西望路漫漫、雙袖龍鐘淚不乾!大陸中共對不起台灣人!



本文於 修改第 3 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5782466
來猜一猜,膽小鬼遊戲趴兔會怎樣?
推薦4


一江春水向東流
等級:5
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (4)

ss77
we do
天恩客
Yvony

來猜一猜,膽小鬼遊戲趴兔會怎樣?

1.羅斯福號回新加坡,大家放春假囉

2.羅斯福號回夏威夷,大家放春假囉

3.很多人猜的,很沒創意的,到台灣海峽晃晃,看夾尾煙火秀會不會又不給看,提前GG?

4.菲律賓參謀長包蒂斯塔(Rolando Bautista,說不定快當總統了)見證了世紀夾尾秀,總得把客人送回家吧?

羅斯福號直接進馬尼拉灣,南北都顧得到、夾其兩端,大家渡假! 而且菲律賓旅遊不像墾丁,把人當盤子,讓瘋瘋癲癲的杜特蒂病情好轉,看到羅斯福號,小杜不只會想起小羅斯福,也會想起老羅斯福(Theodore Roosevelt)


 

讓瘋子和傻子記得: 甚麼叫American Style



本文於 修改第 3 次
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5782443
30年來中國首度出現貿易逆差!!
推薦4


令果
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
文章推薦人 (4)

注意
一江春水向東流
流影
Yvony

垃圾不分藍綠

垃圾藍綠媒體也一樣垃圾!

有一個重要新聞

垃圾藍綠媒體居然都不報還是看不懂英文很可憐!

30年來中國首度出現貿易逆差!!

綠媒忙黑柯

馬媒忙黑蔡

垃圾到忙著當打手當走狗,連媒體的職責都不會了?? (台灣的大傳系的英文都很差,不長進)

出來混,總是得還的

習近平的好大喜功、窮兵黷武、小學程度、考試加分進建中....,終究會害死中國,把中國人民拖進經濟崩潰的深淵!

摘綠簡譯彭博社與各大媒體的hot line:

U.S. Earns More in China Than Trade Numbers Reveal

That leaves American companies vulnerable to retaliation by Beijing. It also gives them more reason to defuse trade tensions.
By 
Daniel Moss
57
2018年4月18日 上午5:00 [GMT+8]

Apple sells more iPhones in China than in the U.S.

 Source: VCG via Getty Images

American companies are doing much more in China than the U.S. trade deficit suggests. It's their greatest weakness.

The deficit, the difference between what the U.S. imports from China and what it exports there, widened to $375 billion last year. It sounds like a lot. President Donald Trump and others take it as evidence that the relationship between the world's two largest economies is out of whack.

But comparing imports to exports is not a full picture of American commerce with China. A closer look reveals that U.S. firms are in significantly better shape than the deficit suggests -- and therefore also are more vulnerable to a trade war.

The huge missing ingredient in the trade deficit number is the business done in China by American companies.

General Motors Co. sells more cars in China than at home. There are more Apple Inc. iPhones used in the Middle Kingdom than in the U.S. Overall, China subsidiaries of U.S. companies sold $223 billion of stuff in 2015, reckons Deutsche Bank AG. 

Much of that business isn't reflected in the deficit figures reported each month by the U.S. Commerce Department because the goods never actually cross a border. American firms' output is produced in China and sold in China. In the U.S., Chinese firms don't make and sell nearly as much. Deutsche Bank's estimate was just $22 billion.

That's ultimately a weakness in Trump's trade skirmish. U.S. companies are very exposed to retaliation by China that might go way beyond the question of tit-for-tat tariffs on imports.

The travails of Lotte Group might be instructive. The South Korean conglomerate was building a $2.7 billion theme park in China. Then relations between Seoul and Beijing deteriorated. China halted work on the theme park, in Shenyang in China's northeast, when tensions flared over South Korea's deployment of a U.S. missile shield in 2016. Lotte was also forced to suspend department store operations after alleged violations of fire-safety rules. Korean airlines were hampered, as was Hyundai Motor Co.

Trump has proposed tariffs worth $50 billion on Chinese imports as part of a formal process under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. In what might have been a fit of pique, he ordered officials to consider a further $100 billion. U.S. exports to China amounted to $130 billion last year. If China retaliates in kind, it will run out of U.S. products to hit with tariffs. It might resort to measures other than tariffs. All those Chinese subsidiaries of American companies suddenly look like a target.

These operations are critical for American business. As sales overseas become more important for U.S.-based firms, China becomes more important still. The U.S. is due for a recession in the next few years; the expansion that began in 2009 is now almost the longest ever. At some point it will end. Strong operations offshore will compensate for softness at home.

American finance and industry, through their global sway and their presence in China, have access to some very senior Chinese officials. Of course big businesses are also influential in U.S. politics. There is hope for companies to steer both administrations away from punitive trade actions. Back channels may be the key to avoiding a trade war.

Corporate America is far bigger in China than the trade deficit would have you believe. Trump should keep in mind that the U.S. has a lot to lose.  

(Corrects amount of additional tariffs under consideration in ninth paragraph.)
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

    To contact the author of this story:
    Daniel Moss at dmoss@bloomberg.net

    To contact the editor responsible for this story:
    Philip Gray at philipgray@bloomberg.net

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-04-17/u-s-trade-deficit-does-not-reflect-subsidiaries-in-china 

     

    Please use the sharing tools found via the email icon at the top of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here
    https://www.ft.com/content/e9a60e5c-3ec3-11e8-b7e0-52972418fec4

    China posts first trade deficit in over a year Share on Twitter (opens new window) Share on Facebook (opens new window) Share on LinkedIn (opens new window) Save Save to myFT Alice Woodhouse in Hong Kong APRIL 13, 2018 Print this page Chinese exports fell back in March with the country posting its first trade deficit in dollar-denominated terms in more than a year. China’s dollar-denominated exports fell 2.7 per cent year on year in March, according to figures from the General Administration of Customs, coming in short of a Reuters poll forecasting a 10 per cent increase. Imports rose 14.4 per cent in dollar-denominated terms, higher than the 10 per cent increase forecast. That shook out to a trade deficit of $4.98bn, the first deficit since February 2017. Analysts had forecast a trade surplus of $27.21bn. The figures were released against a backdrop of growing US-China trade tensions with Beijing and Washington exchanging threats to impose import tariffs.  Julian Evans-Pritchard, senior China economist for Capital economics, played down the significance of the trade deficit, however, citing seasonal factors and adding that he expects a surplus to return in April. He said: The upshot is that the latest trade data suggest that both domestic and foreign demand held up well in March. The biggest risk going forward is clearly that the current trade tensions escalate to the point where meaningful tariff barriers are erected. But even if this is avoided, trade looks likely to soften slightly over the coming quarters given that global growth now appears past its peak and China’s own economy faces rising headwinds from tighter policy.

    https://www.ft.com/content/e9a60e5c-3ec3-11e8-b7e0-52972418fec4 

    回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
    引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5782438
    高瞻遠矚!!
        回應給: 天恩客(jesusismysavior) 推薦4


    令果
    等級:8
    留言加入好友

     
    文章推薦人 (4)

    ss77
    天恩客
    一江春水向東流
    Yvony

    我佩服!

    自己都快餓到脫褲子了,還惠台咧!

    只有黨報與馬黨白癡學者還在繼續白癡!

     

    回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
    引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=59483&aid=5782435
    頁/共2頁 回應文章第一頁 回應文章上一頁 回應文章下一頁 回應文章最後一頁