網路城邦
回本城市首頁 家國主義 家主政治 中華家國
市長:梅峰健保免費公投  副市長: 早早安(顏俊家)子鳴Abr尉左
加入本城市推薦本城市加入我的最愛訂閱最新文章
udn城市政治社會政治時事【家國主義 家主政治 中華家國】城市/討論區/
討論區美州曾公 字體:
看回應文章  上一個討論主題 回文章列表 下一個討論主題
對奧步馬經濟政策的哲理批判
 瀏覽1,489|回應2推薦0

曾太公
等級:8
留言加入好友
 

How stimulus can help your wallet

Congress appears close to finalizing the economic recovery plan. Here's a look at some of the likely provisions for individuals:

Make Work Pay Credit

One-time payments to those who don't work

Break for higher income families

Temporary deduction for car buyers

Temporary credit for home buyers: The bill doubles the size of an existing temporary home buyer credit to $15,000. It also would allow all home buyers to claim it. And it removes the requirement under current law that the credit be paid back. Estimated cost: $39 billion.

New college credit

Pell Grants

Child tax credit

Earned income tax credit

Health insurance help for the jobless: The bill includes provisions to help eligible jobless workers pay for health insurance under Cobra. Cobra coverage allows newly laid off workers to keep health insurance provided by their former employers for a period of time.

Unemployment benefits

Food stamp payments

Help for needy families

 

 

 

****  ****  **** 

Do We Really Care?

Reading the above CNN article, one question keeps popping up in my mind: Are all these bullshits our politicians can do now?

Yes, since the last Great Depression, we do take some good steps to improve our society, including mortgage rules.  But, facing the new ages, can we afford the stupidity or laziness to just be a copy cat of FDR?

In my previous articles, I have figured out one main rhythm in our government popular songs: The Poorer You are, The More Benefits We Give. 

Yes, in the hindsight of history, Roman Empire followed the philosophy of Christianity: to give to the poor.    Historians said the empire focused itself on "re-distribution of wealth for the needy," but forgot "making more income to all."  The pie kept shrinking; the empire didn't make it and finally confined itself into a small city Vatican. 

Yes, we need to subsidize the misfortunate and further extend our hands out to help those falling down.  We call it "charity cause."   However, the charity activities used to be set aside for individuals and private organizations.  Since we invented our Social Security, our government is getting more and more deeper into so-called "Public Charity"; and becomes the major player in the field to compete with private sectors, if not the most important actor.

I wonder if it is good for a government to be so deeply involved in the charity.  Please don't get me wrong.  I love to see our government to be generous to help.  I have a big sweet heart to feel so sad when I saw the invisible situation our American poor folks fail in, such as I cried after reading the Tent City news. 

[note: please see my article: A Funny World (17): Your Tent City? Or My Tear City?   After I moved to Texas, I personally touched the poverty of America so that I set a rule for myself that is well known in my community: A neighbor can come to me to borrow $50 anytime in need.  That's the credit line I can afford to do.  It helped some to buy gasoline to work and to buy a bag of dog food to feed their pets in the last fuel surge.  The money given is deemed to me a loss or donation; I didn't expect its return.  But my neighbors did return the money when they got a paycheck, except two.] 

The problem bothers me is: does our government have no other better jobs to do? 

Go ask any student majored in political science: What is the major function of a government?  Isn't it "governing?"  Further ask: what is the difference between governing and daily management?

History tells us that a government set the rules for people and business to follow.  A successful government did it simple, easily, and fair; while a failed one made it hard for public officials to understand and implement; or unpredictable to the general public at the worst.  Just as some NEWS report recently: "Now the best for investors is not to do anything."  Fully understandable, since our government changed game rules almost everyday in the past 1 year. 

Very true as a movie commercial put: "There is one rule.  That is no rule."  Everyday the rule changes, your expected success of your decision-making turns into disastrous.  Don't believe me?  Go ask any option investor why he let his option expired after a new mandate surprised him?  Some decent managers even closed their funds due to "no rule to play the game."  How can we expect private investors come back to the investment world as Ben Benanke or Tim Geithner dreams of, if there is purely a jungle used to be full of normal market uncertainty which still can be controlled or calculated; and now even worse, mixed in so many unpredictable properties of constant legal changes made by government?  A prudent investor will based on reason and profitability, not a Las Vegas gambler counting on his luckiness. 

The most important factors in a good government game rule are focused on two things: 1) reward the good deeds and punish the wrongdoings pretty clearly; 2) encourage people believe to work harder since the rules outline the bare-bone theme: "the reward for working is better than not working and extending hands out."  The rules give the motives for people to pursue his welfare at his own will, not depending on others, such as God, Heaven Mandate or a big brother government.   Why USSR, a communist regime, failed?  Simple, no incentive for an individual to work decently, let alone hard or creatively.

Now, let's take a good look at all the programs out of our government people?  What can you see?  Probably my eyes are simple and narrow that I can see only one thing in common: "the deeper you fall in poverty, the more benefits you are given."  Well, how about the middle class or working class who is doing barely okay in this difficult time?  Nothing if you are NOT falling down deeper enough, period.  

In order to get those benefits, you have to fall down first, as the writer of "Rich Dad, Poor Dad" said to TV in a mentor show that "you have to fail before you reach success."  Some listeners couldn't believe what they heard from him.   Do we expect the same things happen to our people as in the 30' depression, or our bureaucrats believe that is going to take place anyway?  

Folks, I have a question for you: Do we take needed steps to encourage our people to face the challenge of the depression and work out the risks proudly and positively by themselves?  Or we just make the rules to advise them to passively sit in home to be fed hopelessly, without lights at the end of tunnel?

It is good that we are unhappy about the slavery system to abolish it.  However, did we make a needed social and economic process to really help a slave?  In the realm of international power politics, there is a situation called "sub-colonization," which is worse than a colony under clearly and orderly rule of an imperialist power.  No, history told us that we didn't at the time we set them free.  We made a big mistake by just letting them free and wodering in the street without substantial assistance.  We created a situation even worse than a slave with a benevolent master before the Liberation.  That's why we have so unsatisfactory situations leading us to turnoil in 1960'.   

Can we afford the same mistake in social context?  I am just wondering: is that all our Washington or New York "elites" can put on the table out of their kitchen?  Where is the beef?  No other easy and better ways out in this downturn?  

Sure, I believe, you know I don't think so!


雲遊去了﹐有緣自聚
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘

引用
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50415&aid=3273627
引用者清單(2)
2009/02/25 01:26 【不平則鳴】 有人願學孔明﹐領軍令狀『草船借箭』﹐一年內解決全美『經濟大蕭條』嗎﹖
2009/02/13 14:22 【曾太公落美洲】 今晚讓人很難過
 回應文章
有人願學孔明領軍令狀﹐一年內解決全美『經濟大蕭條』嗎﹖
推薦0


曾太公
等級:8
留言加入好友

 
引用文章有人願學孔明﹐領軍令狀『草船借箭』﹐一年內解決全美『經濟大蕭條』嗎﹖
回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50415&aid=3301928
今晚讓人很難過
推薦0


曾太公
等級:8
留言加入好友

 

The More U Buy, The More U Save; The Deeper U fail, The More Benefit U Get. (即本欄主欄文﹕對奧步馬經濟政策的哲理批判)

Tonight, I am sad enough to know a situation.  I know that is my fault.  Every time I brought something out in AR, I will encounter a new "something."   This morning I am talking about the subject of average main street Joe who is not falling down deep enough, I come across a new cruel reality of it in my surroundings. 

One of my neighbors is going through divorce.  Her name is Pat.  Currently she is renting a house and the rent is $1,400 a month.  Without her spouse who moved out, she knows it is impossible for her to stay there.  Her own wages are $1900 a month.  She has been working for a reputable medical lab for 8 years.  The moment I saw her, I felt she is a nice and decent lady even she has a pit bow dog with her, without the recommendation letter from her manager Mr. Bailey.

Here is a major problem she faces.  Because of her pet dog, almost no apartment management will make her easy to lease a unit.   She keeps trying for 2 months.  Finally, she thought she might get help from me since I gave her a bag of dog treat when I saw her walking her dog passing by my house even we are strangers.

She comes to me and wants to buy my house when she saw my "FSBO" sign and thought it over.

To me, I am willing to help.  But I have a big problem too.  she doesn't have any downpayment.  Last time in September 2008, I let someone move into the house 3 months before close of escrow.  After I saw his workers' living condition (14 persons in 3 BR, 2 BA, mattress in Garage,) I gave them permission to use the vacant property before close of escrow on one condition that they have to pay the utilities even there is no rent charge from me.  To make the long story short, the buyer didn't pay a penny for the utilities as he agreed.  It is my first experience to go to "peace" court to evict them.  My total loss is $2,500 (they took all my stuffs with them.)  I learned a lesson: no down payment, no way to sell or move in (probably. some reader remember I said I have never had a problem by letting people move in before close of escrow.  See, I went through the bad one immediately after I put it in my previous article.)

At late afternoon while I am working on my hobby: to put new tile floor to improve a property, she comes to talk to me.  She promises me that she will pay extra money every month to meet my minimum down payment in 6 months, with financial help from her son who just deployed to Afghanistan this month (his pay is greatly increased once he is in the military front.)   I said to her that I will reduce the amount of down payment to $4,000.  At last, I further reduced to $3,000.  Still, no down payment at this moment, no hope to make a move in 5 days as she gave her landlord a notice.

I can see her eyes are with tears and she is so helpless.  I felt so sorry for her without any help from friends, co-workers, or she is so bashful to mention to them she needs help.  I wish I could never have the bad experience last year.  It caused me give my words to my girlfriend that "no more free move-in." (NOTE: don't blame her, she knows my shortcomings trying to protect me.  One of them is I have a big heart.)  So, my heart might be open.  

Well, tomorrow I am going to talk to my preacher Ken to see if there is anything we can do about it.   My current idea is that I will donate $ 5,000 back to the church if they can help her with a loan of $10,000; or give her a grant of thousands dollars.

Well, let's get together to do something of "private charity" to fill in the vacuum fields left by the government "public Charity" centered on the idea "NO Benefit if you don't fall down, such as unemployment.)  I know Pat needs help and she is not a hands-out.  All she needs is a temporary help that she is unable to get from our government programs.  Seems that our government dumps her because she has a job.  With help in deed, she will be fine and have no problem to make payment of $650 to me per her income stabs and loan ratio.

Tonight, I am going to pray for her and hope everything is fine, including the dog can stay with her.  (NOTE: There is enough news telling us that so many pets was abandoned by foreclosed home owner and set free into the street.)    

May God help all!

回應 回應給此人 推薦文章 列印 加入我的文摘
引用網址:http://city.udn.com/forum/trackback.jsp?no=50415&aid=3275596